Back to @Paccoo1998's profile

Paccoo RJ engagement report

@Paccoo1998 - 236K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 236K followers
Per impression
0.227%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
5.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.227% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 437x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Paccoo RJ's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Paccoo RJ sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026437x their median

    搬入完了❗️ https://t.co/zZea0MPK8I

    11K7377758335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026199x their median

    Postei lá https://t.co/2op6FRGONT https://t.co/MFpRgSMIaL

    5.0K49932046K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026195x their median

    Quarenta picadas de abelhas 🐝 🐝 🐝 mas alguém apareceu para salvá-la do pior https://t.co/bx8Rm431Oc

    5.1K2829011234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026175x their median

    e dae @ThanosdoMato tu dava uma comida pra mendiga e drogas? https://t.co/ylUg8UgC1Z

    4.7K131509475K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026126x their median

    Essa é sensação que o governo Lula te da é impressionante https://t.co/0PD7UXmpBm

    3.2K7918017230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026121x their median

    That's style, my friend 😮 https://t.co/s2zE1vQCVL

    3.1K2724916102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026116x their median

    Andressa Urach relatou que o Lucas Viana tem BAFO, e quando discutiu com ele quase desmaiou, e também comentou que ele estava todo suado em cima da cama dela (fedendo). QUE BABADO! 🗣️ https://t.co/3YicDL2Slh

    3.0K63131835.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202667x their median

    🚨AGORA: Veja quais partes do corpo mais doem na hora de fazer uma tatuagem. https://t.co/U381s7WczO

    1.7K274559186K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202649x their median

    🚨VEJA: Andressa Urach revela que se arrepende de ter feito bifurcação na língua. https://t.co/vgPw7JgKjl

    1.3K22325136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202644x their median

    Qual tu quer? 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/Korji0ICta

    1.2K5011048K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.227% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 437x its own typical post.

What is Paccoo RJ's engagement rate on X?
Paccoo RJ (@Paccoo1998) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 236,409 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Paccoo RJ sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Paccoo1998 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Paccoo1998 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going