Back to @PabloTorre's profile

Pablo Torre πŸ‘€ engagement report

@PabloTorre - 324K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.17%
of 324K followers
Per impression
1.66%
226K views on a typical post
Reach
70.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.051%
116 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.1/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 324K followers, an engagement rate of 1.17%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 16,125 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 69.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pablo Torre πŸ‘€'s engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,125 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.17%, Pablo Torre πŸ‘€ sits above the 75th percentile of the 162,580 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.608% to 2.35%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.129%
p750.608%
p902.35%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 162,580 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,852 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.129%
75th percentile0.608%
90th percentile2.35%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202614x their median

    Accountability for the wealthiest people on Earth is hard to come by. Thank you for believing in the power of independent journalism to accomplish it. (And, yes, more to come.) https://t.co/xi8BD3MCzv

    48K4.4K5732421.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202610x their median

    πŸ‘€

    35K1.9K565381966K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.5x their median

    *whispers* bang https://t.co/wEJM9RbMyn

    13K2489117228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.3x their median

    I’m just glad that the 49ers PR guy finally got a fun one

    8.2K249155224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.8x their median

    Is there a sports bubble? @stavvybaby says private equity ruining franchises will have "football fans reading Karl Marx": "If they destroy the Lakers, guys with Kobe back tattoos are going to start f***ing, like, the proletariat revolution." https://t.co/nb0z1jbEAj

    6.1K4945042405K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.6x their median

    Gonna go live at 6p ET on the @pablofindsout YT channel to react to the thing we've been reporting for 364 days. @DavidPSamson and @DarthAmin will join us. WE HAVE A LOT TO DISCUSS: https://t.co/uwSwLq6PRM

    5.1K492209111806K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Court 17 forever: https://t.co/FPBKS45rVX

    1.5K873110114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Look who @PabloTorre go to hang out with at the @nytimes 175 gala today https://t.co/LuO9b6oZwr

    634152720326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    UNC says the investigation into the football program is done & β€œcertain actions demonstrated a disregard for Carolina’s values and standards of conduct.” Steve Belichick has also resigned. Full statement from UNC: https://t.co/iUzmdaC2gt

    366662021224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    One key theory of @pablofindsout is that sports are an unparalleled vehicle of class consciousness. Thank you to @stavvybaby for letting me sit in his fancy new chair and explaining why: https://t.co/EsSs76ItMP

    409327043K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 324K followers, an engagement rate of 1.17%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 16,125 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 69.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Pablo Torre πŸ‘€'s engagement rate on X?
Pablo Torre πŸ‘€ (@PabloTorre) has an engagement rate of 1.17%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 324,152 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.17%, Pablo Torre πŸ‘€ sits above the 75th percentile of the 162,580 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PabloTorre have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,125 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PabloTorre post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going