Back to @PabloEchenique's profile

Pablo Echenique engagement report

@PabloEchenique - 594K followers on X

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.128%
of 594K followers
Per impression
5.80%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
2.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
761
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 761 interactions against 594K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 5.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #vivienda.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pablo Echenique's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.128%, Pablo Echenique sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,870 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202617x their median

    Ahora que EEUU se ha apoderado de 65.000 millones de barriles de petróleo venezolano, duplicando sus reservas estratégicas, queda claro que todos los que decían que el secuestro de Nicolás Maduro era para defender la democracia eran unos genios.

    9.6K2.9K3163876K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202615x their median

    Buenos días. Me paso unos minutos por aquí para recordar que los que estáis llamando "invasores" a niñas migrantes de 14 años sois escoria. Feliz miércoles.

    4.4K9525.4K4241.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202610x their median

    He creado esta herramienta para que votemos al líder que más valoramos para el Frente Amplio. Es muy sencilla: votáis y, en la última página, podéis consultar cómo va el ranking en tiempo real. En unos días compartiré también los resultados por aquí. https://t.co/pPDrw3TY5C https://t.co/qL0QBNwHaj

    4.9K2.0K6402821.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20267.2x their median

    Un delincuente pide al juzgado ser él mismo el que se ocupe de subastar los Ferrari que le han incautado. Lo lógico es que el juzgado se ría a carcajadas. Pero, si el delincuente está ayudando al PP, el desenlace puede ser muy distinto. https://t.co/vwJIwqTgjR

    3.7K1.7K1371729K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.6x their median

    —Antonio, yo creo que tienes que poner a Alvise por delante de Podemos aunque en tu propia tabla se vea que va por detrás. —Eduardo, es demasiado burdo, pero vamos con ello. https://t.co/JzLZPWug9i

    2.4K77720836106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.3x their median

    Permiso de trabajo inmediato, escolarización, sanidad, prestaciones y alojamiento para más de 250.000 ucranianos en España, de los cuales, solo el 5% venían de zonas de guerra. Lean a @irezugasti y comparen con Ceuta ⬇️ https://t.co/Qzrtn5Itfj

    9415941.6K158258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.3x their median

    La derecha busca enfrentar a pensionistas con trabajadores diciendo que las pensiones son muy altas cuando en realidad lo que ocurre es que los salarios son bajos. Encima lo hacen torturando las matemáticas y desinformando. https://t.co/eDqQpayUhT

    2.0K1.1K881417K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.2x their median

    Es fácil: a Irene Montero. https://t.co/5xd2dy1kVW

    1.8K5748106672K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.2x their median

    Que El País haga hoy un análisis de encuestas poniendo a una coalición que ya no existe —nuevo nombre, distintos partidos— y no tiene ni siquiera candidato y ocultando a Podemos, que existe y tiene candidata, da una idea de qué tipo de campaña va a hacer la progresía mediática 🤷 https://t.co/eq8eSIWwv0

    1.8K1.0K2825446K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.0x their median

    Hace unas semanas, la derecha mediática se puso a gritar que los malvados comunistas chinos nos iban a espiar desde una fábrica de coches en Ferrol. Hoy Feijóo avala la fábrica. No paran de hacer el ridículo con el tema de China 🤡 https://t.co/EUHfPkKDsw

    2.0K95275816K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vivienda

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 761 interactions against 594K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 5.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Pablo Echenique's engagement rate on X?
Pablo Echenique (@PabloEchenique) has an engagement rate of 0.128%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 593,566 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.128%, Pablo Echenique sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PabloEchenique have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PabloEchenique post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going