Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® engagement report
@P_McCulloughMD - 1.3M followers on X
Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 462 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.
Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®'s engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.037%, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 30, 202639x their median
So it turns out that Fauci was providing cover for CIA Operations during ‘Covid’ and Bill Gates had a ‘Security Clearance’ for the Intelligence Community. NO ONE COULD POSSIBLY BELIEVE AT THIS POINT THAT THEY CARED ABOUT YOUR HEALTH https://t.co/OEIz3IBCEY
- Aug 28, 202616x their median
BREAKING: FDA Approves New Pfizer and Moderna XFG mRNA COVID Shots Based on Data From Just 8–10 Mice The new formulations were approved before their human safety and immunogenicity studies even began. Pfizer and Moderna minimizing their costs and maximizing profits from you. Companies have no idea how many years synthetic mRNA lasts in the body and they don't care. URL TheFocalPoints. @pfizer @moderna_tx @McCulloughFund @NicHulscher
- Aug 20, 202615x their median
BREAKING: FDA Data Reanalysis Sent to HHS Finds Moderna’s mRNA Flu Shot Approval Should Be Immediately Withdrawn We directly reanalyzed the FDA’s own data used to approve mFLUSIVA and found an extreme risk-benefit profile that is impossible to justify, by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH. Kyle Diamantas, JD, current Acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Dr. Heidi Overton nominated to be permanent, full-time FDA Commissioner have a mess on their hands. Overton has < 15 peer-reviewed publications and no track record on experience with published safety data or how to manage risk-benefit analyses. URL TheFocalPoints. @SecKennedy @HeidiOverton @NicHulscher @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @McCulloughFund
- Aug 24, 202614x their median
Documentary evidence that the US government pandemic response led by now disgraced Dr Anthony Fauci knew about damage to the fetus from genetic COVID-19 vaccination. Dr Peter McCullough® and investigative journalist John Leake from 2021 to 2026 expose the chain of evidence. McCullough® warned against this from the very beginning. @McCulloughFund @johnsearsleake @SenRonJohnson @RandPaul https://t.co/ISRBg45O08
- Aug 17, 202613x their median
About 75% of pandemic embalmers reported large, rubbery amyloid-like fibrous blood clots. This is due to the ubiquitous population exposure to the Spike protein. Courtesy EMEI Grand Rounds. Full article at focalpoints. @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund @Havi4267Thomas https://t.co/s11r4N3rpF
- Aug 30, 202612x their median
Never thought this could happen during my medical career: -US-Chinese collaboration creates novel coronavirus in Wuhan Institute of Virology -Virus is highly contagious, deadly for elderly and frail -Manipulated Spike protein retained in body causing organ damage, inflammation, autoimmunity, blood clots -World falls into fear-based trance with lockdowns, masking, social distancing, economic shutdown -Early treatment protocols are suppressed -Genetic code for deadly Spike protein is target of mRNA/adenoviral DNA mass vaccination, mandatory for school, jobs, travel -Synthetic mRNA, vaccine Spike persist in body for years causing disease and death -No government recognizes gravity of situation -No vaccine inspections, recalls, or safety analyses -Based on COVID-19 mRNA backbone, more genetic vaccines (RSV, influenza, cancer) rolled out with no way to shut them off once injected -Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex rolls on, rife with corruption, fraud, abuse, consuming trillions of dollars Courtesy AMI365
- Aug 26, 20269.2x their median
She Believed in It With Her Whole Heart Dolly Parton's hope for the genetic vaccine was as pure as anything she ever sang — and then her immune system turned on her, and a "brief battle" took her away. URL TheFocalPoints. @McCulloughFund @DollyParton https://t.co/MkHFvTDFTJ
- Aug 28, 20268.5x their median
With all the controversy over counting people who died *with* measles rather than *from* measles, it seems like a good time to revisit what my investigation found on how govt. miscounted Covid cases. More original reports like this are coming starting in 2 wks when I begin Season 12 of my TV program @FullMeasureNews
- Aug 20, 20265.8x their median
With pharmaceutically engineered, synthetic mRNA and Spike protein found in the human heart, how can potential long term damage be ignored? Why no BIG PHARMA or HHS agency investigation? How can more mRNA products (boosters, mRESVIA, mFLUSIVA) be allowed on the market? Courtesy Pompa Podcast. @McCulloughFund
- Aug 29, 20264.9x their median
To resolve the root cause of long-COVID and vaccine injury syndromes, the Spike protein must be enzymatically dissolved. Human body cannot do it alone. Principle of McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detoxification. Natural prevails over synthetic throughout the pandemic. Courtesy AMI365. @McCulloughFund
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 462 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.
- What is Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®'s engagement rate on X?
- Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® (@P_McCulloughMD) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,255,652 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.037%, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @P_McCulloughMD have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @P_McCulloughMD post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.13 posts per day across the measured window.