Back to @PSchrags's profile

Peter Schrager engagement report

@PSchrags - 615K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.088%
of 615K followers
Per impression
0.913%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
9.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
538
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 538 interactions against 615K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter Schrager's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.088%, Peter Schrager sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 202621x their median

    Can Skattebo: “That was a great win. A year ago, we lose that game 100%.” https://t.co/qt631xJ9Lo

    11K4321391151.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202613x their median

    No one is talking about the @Raiders . Anywhere. @KyleBrandt addresses the silver and black. https://t.co/sE4E3nqvJk

    5.9K1.0K179124233K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202612x their median

    Giants 10th overall pick Sisi Mauigoa had about as dominant a debut performance from a rookie offensive lineman you could have ever asked for or expected. The goal as always -- you never hear his name. He dominated the interior and a handled a very good interior Cowboys DL. Plenty more tomorrow on @BigDayESPN

    6.3K3205027328K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202612x their median

    How about Todd Monken? First head coach in NFL history to get a job for the first time at 60 years or older to start a season 3-1 or better.

    6.2K1965019143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20269.7x their median

    You can feel the weight of the world lift off of Davis Webb's shoulders in this one clip. The game, and perhaps the season, completely changed in that third quarter. https://t.co/BMCM4kCugf

    5.1K75227506K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.0x their median

    Seahawks and Knicks -- the rare defending champions who'll be considered underdogs in their own divisions. And they're both likely quite fine with that...

    4.1K129599212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20267.3x their median

    Crazy this was 30 years ago today. https://t.co/ywimVdrmtr

    3.5K258931021.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.4x their median

    Jesse Minter gets a win in his NFL head coaching debut ; Chargers give up 400 yards on defense without him. Said this many times over summer-- just as I had my questions around Lions last year without Ben Johnson, Chargers with no Minter was worth watching. Coaching!

    3.3K100468149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.9x their median

    This is so special. I'll never forget James Palmer interviewing Paul Rudd at the first Chiefs SB parade and asking Rudd who his favorite story on the SB team was, and Rudd saying it was time to take a moment to thank and appreciate Smith for everything he gave the org, Mahomes, and Reid. Smith never got to feel the love at those parades. Hopefully he felt it here. https://t.co/qaL0yqJOkO

    2.9K1922915266K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.7x their median

    Instant analysis of Sydney’s 141-88 win over Brisbane. https://t.co/ArcRtZ0XjO

    2.2K6117582810K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 538 interactions against 615K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is Peter Schrager's engagement rate on X?
Peter Schrager (@PSchrags) has an engagement rate of 0.088%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 614,816 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.088%, Peter Schrager sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PSchrags have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PSchrags post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going