Peter Schrager engagement report
@PSchrags - 615K followers on X
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 538 interactions against 615K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Peter Schrager's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.088%, Peter Schrager sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 55% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 202621x their median
Can Skattebo: “That was a great win. A year ago, we lose that game 100%.” https://t.co/qt631xJ9Lo
- Sep 23, 202613x their median
No one is talking about the @Raiders . Anywhere. @KyleBrandt addresses the silver and black. https://t.co/sE4E3nqvJk
- Sep 14, 202612x their median
Giants 10th overall pick Sisi Mauigoa had about as dominant a debut performance from a rookie offensive lineman you could have ever asked for or expected. The goal as always -- you never hear his name. He dominated the interior and a handled a very good interior Cowboys DL. Plenty more tomorrow on @BigDayESPN
- Oct 2, 202612x their median
How about Todd Monken? First head coach in NFL history to get a job for the first time at 60 years or older to start a season 3-1 or better.
- Sep 21, 20269.7x their median
You can feel the weight of the world lift off of Davis Webb's shoulders in this one clip. The game, and perhaps the season, completely changed in that third quarter. https://t.co/BMCM4kCugf
- Aug 30, 20268.0x their median
Seahawks and Knicks -- the rare defending champions who'll be considered underdogs in their own divisions. And they're both likely quite fine with that...
- Aug 2, 20267.3x their median
Crazy this was 30 years ago today. https://t.co/ywimVdrmtr
- Sep 14, 20266.4x their median
Jesse Minter gets a win in his NFL head coaching debut ; Chargers give up 400 yards on defense without him. Said this many times over summer-- just as I had my questions around Lions last year without Ben Johnson, Chargers with no Minter was worth watching. Coaching!
- Sep 17, 20265.9x their median
This is so special. I'll never forget James Palmer interviewing Paul Rudd at the first Chiefs SB parade and asking Rudd who his favorite story on the SB team was, and Rudd saying it was time to take a moment to thank and appreciate Smith for everything he gave the org, Mahomes, and Reid. Smith never got to feel the love at those parades. Hopefully he felt it here. https://t.co/qaL0yqJOkO
- Sep 5, 20264.7x their median
Instant analysis of Sydney’s 141-88 win over Brisbane. https://t.co/ArcRtZ0XjO
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 538 interactions against 615K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.
- What is Peter Schrager's engagement rate on X?
- Peter Schrager (@PSchrags) has an engagement rate of 0.088%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 614,816 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.088%, Peter Schrager sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @PSchrags have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @PSchrags post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.