Back to @PSchrags's profile

Peter Schrager engagement report

@PSchrags - 610K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.135%
of 610K followers
Per impression
0.787%
104K views on a typical post
Reach
17.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
822
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
52 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 822 interactions against 610K followers, an engagement rate of 0.135%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 0.787% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter Schrager's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.135%, Peter Schrager sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 20265.2x their median

    Seahawks and Knicks -- the rare defending champions who'll be considered underdogs in their own divisions. And they're both likely quite fine with that...

    4.1K129589209K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20264.8x their median

    Crazy this was 30 years ago today. https://t.co/ywimVdrmtr

    3.5K259931021.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.8x their median

    The 49ers faced a lot of criticism after the selection of Kaelon Black with the 90th pick. He wasn't invited to the Combine and he wasn't valued by the consensus draft boards. We will see, but he had a strong week of practices and showing last night in LA. https://t.co/Y7cpA9wn6a

    2.1K974717201K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.2x their median

    "That might end up being one of the best trades in recent NFL history." —@PSchrags and @JasonMcCourty react to the Cowboys extending Quinnen Williams šŸ’° https://t.co/BEFGIWN88C

    1.7K1161912252K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    Undrafted Cowboys OT Shiyazh Pete, the first member of the Navajo Nation ever signed to an NFL team, made the play of the game and had the best locker room speech of the preseason. There's so much made over how "worthless" the preseason games are. Nothing "worthless" here. https://t.co/3OzlhaBuFW

    1.5K11319874K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.9x their median

    Bain with a sick hump move. Sheesh! https://t.co/err5hv3PH2

    1.2K124341381.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    Tyler Shough led all rookie QBs in wins, passing yards, and passer rating last year. His 67% completion percentage was the 3rd best in NFL history by a rookie QB. So, yes, I am high on the Saints. šŸ“ˆ @PatMcAfeeShow @nick_underhill @ESPNNFL @LRiddickESPN https://t.co/A9elvIhApT

    9841144424165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Blessed to have known OJ Brigance. When we co-wrote his book "Strength of a Champion," he was 6 years into his fight with ALS. 12 years later, today's news is a somber reminder of this disease's cruelty. Yet - to see him battle all these years...STRENGTH OF A CHAMPION, indeed.

    1.1K6210360K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Dart is coached by Nagy, Callahan, and Greg Roman. QBs they've worked w/: Mahomes, Alex Smith, Stafford, Peyton, Derek Carr, Tyrod, Lamar, Herbert... Jameis and Brandon Allen are his backups. Each have 10+ years in league. That's a lot of experience. https://t.co/9MRWSIKsN1

    1.1K24332104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    New @titans HC Robert Saleh is the father of EIGHT kids under the age of 15. How's he make it work? A SAINT of a wife and a lot of love. Another city, another job, and the Salehs keep it rocking. Love convos like this. From this week's "The Schrager Hour". @OmahaProd https://t.co/WLDP6R8kds

    9243222598K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 822 interactions against 610K followers, an engagement rate of 0.135%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 0.787% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

What is Peter Schrager's engagement rate on X?
Peter Schrager (@PSchrags) has an engagement rate of 0.135%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 610,392 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.135%, Peter Schrager sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PSchrags have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PSchrags post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going