Back to @PIBAhmedabad's profile

PIB in Gujarat ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ engagement report

@PIBAhmedabad - 53K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 53K followers
Per impression
0%
442 views on a typical post
Reach
0.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 53K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 442 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.835% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 78% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78 interactions. Recurring topics include #cabinet, #cabinetdecisions, #ladakh.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tags: #cabinet, #cabinetdecisions, #ladakh.

Compared with accounts its own size

PIB in Gujarat ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, PIB in Gujarat ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link78% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 78% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 289 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 2026

    Vice-President Shri C. P. Radhakrishnan graces the third edition of the international conference on Kaumarabhritya, KAUMARACON-2026, organised by the All India Institute of Ayurveda (AIIA), New Delhi today. The Vice President called for greater scientific research into Ayurveda to establish the efficacy of traditional healthcare practices, strengthen patient confidence and enhance the global acceptance of Indiaโ€™s traditional systems of medicine.

    5815236.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    ๐Ÿ“กLIVE Now๐Ÿ“ก Prime Minister @narendramodi launches multiple development projects for #Ladakh Watch:๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ https://t.co/SqlOBytv1B

    28121311K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    เช—เซเชœเชฐเชพเชคเชฎเชพเช‚ โ€˜เชธเชฐเช•เชพเชฐเซ€ เชธเซ‡เชตเชพเช“ เช†เชชเชจเชพ เชฆเซเชตเชพเชฐเซ‡โ€™ เช…เช‚เชคเชฐเซเช—เชค โ€˜เชกเชพเช• เชšเซŒเชชเชพเชฒ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡ เชฎเซ‹เชฌเชพเช‡เชฒ เชฅเชฟเชฏเซ‡เชŸเชฐ เชตเชพเชจ เช…เชญเชฟเชฏเชพเชจโ€™เชจเซ‹ เช…เชฎเชฆเชพเชตเชพเชฆเชฎเชพเช‚ เชถเซเชญเชพเชฐเช‚เชญ เชจเชพเชฃเชพเช•เซ€เชฏ เชธเชฎเชพเชตเซ‡เชถ, เชกเชฟเชœเชฟเชŸเชฒ เช‡เชจเซเชกเชฟเชฏเชพ เช…เชจเซ‡ เช…เช‚เชคเซเชฏเซ‹เชฆเชฏเชฎเชพเช‚ เชฎเชนเชคเซเชตเชชเซ‚เชฐเซเชฃ เชญเซ‚เชฎเชฟเช•เชพ เชญเชœเชตเซ€ เชฐเชนเซเชฏเซเช‚ เช›เซ‡ เชชเซ‹เชธเซเชŸ เชตเชฟเชญเชพเช—, เชกเชพเช• เชšเซŒเชชเชพเชฒ เชฆเซเชตเชพเชฐเชพ เชฅเชถเซ‡ เชœเชจเชธเช‚เชตเชพเชฆ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/OiwzOd6aCG https://t.co/EmGSSZeyma

    7410603 viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    เชญเชพเชฐเชคเซ€เชฏ เชจเซŒเช•เชพเชฆเชณ เช•เชฎเซเชฌเชพเชˆเชจเซเชก เชŸเชพเชธเซเช• เชซเซ‹เชฐเซเชธ 154เชจเซเช‚ เช•เชฎเชพเชจเซเชก เชธเซ‹เช‚เชชเชถเซ‡ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/R5j4KijGlk @SpokespersonMoD https://t.co/pXl8iy8hh1

    3000475 viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    เช•เซ‡เชฌเชฟเชจเซ‡เชŸเซ‡ เชฐเซ‡เชฒเชตเซ‡ เช•เชฐเซเชฎเชšเชพเชฐเซ€เช“ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡ 78 เชฆเชฟเชตเชธเชจเชพ เชชเซเชฐเซ‹เชกเช•เซเชŸเชฟเชตเชฟเชŸเซ€ เชฒเชฟเช‚เช•เซเชก เชฌเซ‹เชจเชธเชจเซ‡ เชฎเช‚เชœเซ‚เชฐเซ€ เช†เชชเซ€ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/esaoWwctyp #CabinetDecisions @RailMinIndia https://t.co/rGTSyo5YDq

    1100448 viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    ICAR, ESTIC-2026 เช…เช—เชพเช‰ เชเช• เชชเชฐเชฟเชšเชฏเชพเชคเซเชฎเช• เชธเชฎเชพเชฐเซ‹เชน เช…เชจเซ‡ เชฎเซ€เชกเชฟเชฏเชพ เชธเชพเชฅเซ‡ เชธเช‚เชตเชพเชฆเชจเซเช‚ เช†เชฏเซ‹เชœเชจ เช•เชฐเชถเซ‡ เชกเซ‰. เชเชฎ. เชเชฒ. เชœเชพเชŸ เช•เชฐเชจเชพเชฒ, เชนเชฐเชฟเชฏเชพเชฃเชพ เช–เชพเชคเซ‡ เชชเชฐเชฟเชšเชฏเชพเชคเซเชฎเช• เชธเชฎเชพเชฐเซ‹เชนเชฎเชพเช‚ ESTIC-2026เชฎเชพเช‚ ICARเชจเซ€ เชญเซ‚เชฎเชฟเช•เชพ เชตเชฟเชถเซ‡ เชธเช‚เชฌเซ‹เชงเชจ เช•เชฐเชถเซ‡ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/49QLLtX1sf @AgriGoI

    2000589 viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    เช•เซ‡เชจเซเชฆเซเชฐเซ€เชฏ เช—เซƒเชน เชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเซ€ @AmitShah เช เชชเซเชฐเชงเชพเชจเชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเซ€ @narendramodi เชจเซ€ เชธเซ‡เชตเชพ เช…เชจเซ‡ เชธเชฎเชฐเซเชชเชฃเชจเชพ 25 เชตเชฐเซเชท เชชเซ‚เชฐเซเชฃ เชฅเชตเชพเชจเชพ เช…เชตเชธเชฐเซ‡ เชšเชพเชฒเซ€ เชฐเชนเซ‡เชฒเชพ 'เชธเซ‡เชตเชพ เชธเช‚เช•เชฒเซเชช เช…เชญเชฟเชฏเชพเชจ' เชนเซ‡เช เชณ เชจเช•เซเชธเชฒเซ€ เชนเชฟเช‚เชธเชพเชฅเซ€ เชชเซเชฐเชญเชพเชตเชฟเชค เชฒเซ‹เช•เซ‹ เชธเชนเชฟเชค เชฆเชฟเชตเซเชฏเชพเช‚เช—เซ‹เชจเซ‡ เชธเชนเชพเชฏเช• เชธเชพเชงเชจเซ‹เชจเชพ เชตเชฟเชคเชฐเชฃ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡เชจเชพ เชธเชฎเชพเชฐเซ‹เชนเชจเซ‡ เชตเซ€เชกเชฟเชฏเซ‹ เช•เซ‹เชจเซเชซเชฐเชจเซเชธเชฟเช‚เช— เชฆเซเชตเชพเชฐเชพ เชธเช‚เชฌเซ‹เชงเชฟเชค เช•เชฐเซเชฏเซ‹ เชชเซเชฐเชงเชพเชจเชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเซ€ เชถเซเชฐเซ€ เชจเชฐเซ‡เชจเซเชฆเซเชฐ เชฎเซ‹เชฆเซ€เชจเชพ เชฎเซเช–เซเชฏเชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเซ€ เชคเชฐเซ€เช•เซ‡ เช…เชจเซ‡ เชชเซเชฐเชงเชพเชจเชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเซ€ เชคเชฐเซ€เช•เซ‡เชจเชพ 25 เชตเชฐเซเชท เชชเซ‚เชฐเซเชฃ เชฅเชตเชพ เชชเชฐ เชฆเซ‡เชถเชญเชฐเชฎเชพเช‚ เช†เชตเชพ 'เชธเซ‡เชตเชพ เชธเช‚เช•เชฒเซเชช เช…เชญเชฟเชฏเชพเชจเซ‹' เชšเชฒเชพเชตเชตเชพเชฎเชพเช‚ เช†เชตเซ€ เชฐเชนเซเชฏเชพ เช›เซ‡ เช† เช…เชญเชฟเชฏเชพเชจเชฎเชพเช‚ เชฎเชพเชคเซเชฐ เชฌเชธเซเชคเชฐเชฅเซ€ เชœ 1,570 เชฅเซ€ เชตเชงเซ เชฒเชพเชญเชพเชฐเซเชฅเซ€เช“ เช›เซ‡, เชœเซ‡ เชฌเชธเซเชคเชฐเชจเซ€ เชชเซ€เชกเชพ เชฆเชฐเซเชถเชพเชตเซ‡ เช›เซ‡ เชญเชพเชฐเชคเชจเซ‡ เชจเช•เซเชธเชฒเชฎเซเช•เซเชค เช•เชฐเซเชฏเชพ เชชเช›เซ€, เชนเชตเซ‡ เชคเซ‡เชจเชพ เช•เชพเชฐเชฃเซ‡ เชฆเซ‡เชถเซ‡ เชธเชนเชจ เช•เชฐเซ‡เชฒเชพ เช˜เชพ เชฐเซเชเชพเชตเชตเชพ เช…เชจเซ‡ เชฆเชฐเซ‡เช• เชชเซ€เชกเชฟเชค เชธเชจเซเชฎเชพเชจ เชธเชพเชฅเซ‡ เชœเซ€เชตเชจ เชœเซ€เชตเซ€ เชถเช•เซ‡ เชคเซ‡เชตเซ€ เชตเซเชฏเชตเชธเซเชฅเชพ เชธเซเชจเชฟเชถเซเชšเชฟเชค เช•เชฐเชตเซ€ เชœเชฐเซ‚เชฐเซ€ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/nXZf6aNYxE

    1000398 viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    ๐Ÿ“กเชœเซ€เชตเช‚เชค เชชเซเชฐเชธเชพเชฐเชฃ ๐Ÿ“ก เชชเซเชฐเชงเชพเชจเชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเซ€ @narendramodi #AsianGames2026 เชจเชพ เชธเชนเชญเชพเช—เซ€เช“ เชธเชพเชฅเซ‡ เชธเช‚เชตเชพเชฆ เช•เชฐเซ€ เชฐเชนเซเชฏเชพ เช›เซ‡. เชœเซเช“: ๐ŸŽฅ https://t.co/WbIu4AN3zK

    1000437 viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    เชฎเชนเชฟเชฒเชพเช“, เชฐเซ‹เชœเช—เชพเชฐ เช…เชจเซ‡ เช‰เชฆเซเชฏเซ‹เช—เชธเชพเชนเชธเชฟเช•เชคเชพ: เชตเชงเซ เชธเชพเชฐเซ€ เช†เชœเซ€เชตเชฟเช•เชพเชจเซ€ เชคเช•เซ‹ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡ เชญเชพเชฐเชคเชจเซเช‚ เชชเซเชฐเซ‹เชคเซเชธเชพเชนเชจ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/Qvlqk2aRqR https://t.co/DWcOghbetX

    1000350 viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    เชธเช‚เชฐเช•เซเชทเชฃ เชฎเช‚เชคเซเชฐเชพเชฒเชฏเซ‡ GSAT-7C เช•เชฎเซเชฏเซเชจเชฟเช•เซ‡เชถเชจ เชธเซ‡เชŸเซ‡เชฒเชพเช‡เชŸ เช…เชจเซ‡ เชตเชฐเซเชฃเชพเชธเซเชคเซเชฐ เชนเซ‡เชตเซ€ เชตเซ‡เช‡เชŸ เชŸเซ‹เชฐเซเชชเชฟเชกเซ‹ เชฎเชพเชŸเซ‡ โ‚น4,106 เช•เชฐเซ‹เชกเชจเชพ เช•เชฐเชพเชฐ เช•เชฐเซเชฏเชพ เชตเชพเช‚เชšเซ‹ เชตเชฟเช—เชคเซ‡: https://t.co/3agSWZVZVj @SpokespersonMoD https://t.co/nnWJSOSDMM

    1000430 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cabinet#cabinetdecisions#ladakh#nsap#asiangames2026

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 53K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 442 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.835% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 78% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78 interactions. Recurring topics include #cabinet, #cabinetdecisions, #ladakh.

What is PIB in Gujarat ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's engagement rate on X?
PIB in Gujarat ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ (@PIBAhmedabad) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 52,953 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, PIB in Gujarat ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PIBAhmedabad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PIBAhmedabad post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going