Back to @PFut10's profile

Pauleta ⚽️🇧🇷 engagement report

@PFut10 - 412K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.252%
of 412K followers
Per impression
2.16%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
11.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.252%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 2.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pauleta ⚽️🇧🇷's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.252%, Pauleta ⚽️🇧🇷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link48% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 48% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 73 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 18, 202625x their median

    Laissez les se barrer en vacances à la mi-temps c’est bon pour nous

    24K2.0K6124385K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202623x their median

    NOOOON CA ALLAIT ETRE LA PLUS GRANDE SEANCE DE TIRS AUX BUTS DE L’HISTOIRE DU FOOT SVP

    23K832309392K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202621x their median

    Non non vous ne revez pas le Paraguay n’a pas encore pris de cartons jaune dans ce match

    21K1.0K4614258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202618x their median

    Le mec qui leak GTA 6 a littéralement le jeu en fait, Rockstar a plus qu’une solution c’est le fumer

    18K4386111713K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202616x their median

    L’arbitrage de merde qu’on se tape faut le dire

    16K8956110182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202613x their median

    C’est deja le plus grand jeu de l’histoire du jeu video objectivement

    12K1.1K4814513K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202613x their median

    LA COUPE DU MONDE N’AURA JAMAIS DE CONCURRENCE

    12K8363617204K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 202612x their median

    Sorloth a vendu son pays

    11K7796310253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/DeJLzFHeiS

    12K198191240K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202611x their median

    Nuno Mendes existe et porte le maillot du Paris Saint Germain comment ne pas etre heureux

    10K9101611118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.252%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 2.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Pauleta ⚽️🇧🇷's engagement rate on X?
Pauleta ⚽️🇧🇷 (@PFut10) has an engagement rate of 0.252%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 412,384 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.252%, Pauleta ⚽️🇧🇷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PFut10 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PFut10 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going