Back to @PDChinese's profile

人民日報 People's Daily engagement report

@PDChinese - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 406 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.494%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
13.53/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 406 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 0.494% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 13.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 406 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 239x its own typical post.

Measured over 406 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

人民日報 People's Daily's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, 人民日報 People's Daily sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 178 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 2026239x their median

    【國慶升旗儀式在天安門廣場舉行】10月1日清晨,隆重的升國旗儀式在北京天安門廣場舉行,慶祝中華人民共和國成立77周年。 https://t.co/ZnbNYBw6aa

    8.1K30516838347K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202661x their median

    【81年前的今天日本簽署投降書】1945年9月2日,日本簽署投降書。為了這一勝利,中國軍民浴血奮戰14年。在世界反法西斯戰爭中,中國人民抗日戰爭開始時間最早、持續時間最長、條件最艱苦,付出的犧牲最大。中國軍民以傷亡3500多萬人的代價,牽制了日軍50%以上的海外兵力。珍愛和平,吾輩自強! https://t.co/Bs74tQSpso

    2.0K143391568K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202660x their median

    【遼寧瀋陽舉行勿忘九一八撞鐘鳴警儀式】2026年是九一八事變爆發95周年。1931年,九一八事變爆發,中華民族開啟了長達14年的浴血奮戰。今天,勿忘九一八撞鐘鳴警儀式在遼寧瀋陽舉行,以銘記歷史、緬懷先烈。9點18分,瀋陽全城拉響防空警報。 https://t.co/BTxfFF4PyU

    1.9K1451091477K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202642x their median

    【第一批應急力量141人已抵達吉隆口岸開展救援】西藏日喀則市吉隆縣發生泥石流災害後,應急管理部立即調派應急救援力量趕赴西藏搶險救援。截至8月27日8時許,第一批救援力量141人已抵吉隆口岸,調派的高原型米-171直升機已抵災區。協調民航包機搭載中國救援隊111人攜帶偵檢、救生、破拆、通信、保障等裝備物資,部自然災害工程救援拉薩、成都基地和中國安能重慶救援隊300人攜120台套裝備,中國中鐵、中國鐵建、中交集團、中國電建、中國能建和中國雅江集團248人攜264台套裝備器材正在趕赴現場救援。同時,就近安排14支隊伍、418人在周邊備勤,隨時出動增援。

    1.2K14710531104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202631x their median

    【吉隆泥石流救援現場畫面】西藏日喀則市吉隆縣泥石流災害救援持續進行中,8月29日清晨,應急管理部、國家消防救援局調派的中國救援隊四川消防救援總隊陸地搜救隊,持續在吉隆口岸泥石流災害現場開展廢墟搜尋,隊員們克服複雜地形條件,對重點區域進行細緻勘查、拉網式排查,持續開展不間斷搜救作業。 據新華社,從西藏自治區應急管理廳獲悉,截至29日1時,已救出熱索村群眾2人,吉隆泥石流災害已造成7人遇難,554人失聯。

    92183812363K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202626x their median

    【今日中秋節,天涯共此時】又是一年中秋時。天上月圓,人間團圓。願月光所至,萬事勝意;願此心歸處,家國平安。 https://t.co/rRugIhbCCP

    859797834K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202626x their median

    【曬圖!最美不過這抹中國紅】金秋華誕,舉國同慶。全國各地已換上“中國紅”皮膚,大街小巷五星紅旗飄揚,氛圍感拉滿。 https://t.co/iUXWHA8a0d

    8594616870K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202626x their median

    【應急管理部、國家消防救援局調派中國救援隊增援西藏日喀則泥石流救援】應急管理部、國家消防救援局調派中國救援隊111名消防救援指戰員,攜帶偵檢、救生、破拆、通信、保障等裝備物資,趕赴災害現場增援。中國救援隊由北京市消防救援總隊、四川省消防救援總隊專業搜救力量組成,曾多次參與重特大災害事故救援工作。

    77856761538K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202622x their median

    【吉隆舉行遇難者哀悼活動】9月1日上午9時55分許,西藏自治區在日喀則市公安局吉隆口岸分局舉行遇難者哀悼活動。泥石流災害核心區域救援現場、道路搶通現場等同步舉行,多方救援人員、地方幹部群眾等參與哀悼活動。 https://t.co/vZHHatN8ET

    66295262155K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202621x their median

    【西藏吉隆救災一線又開通一座4/5G基站】8月30日20時37分,按照西藏自治區通信管理局統一調度部署,應急通信保障人員又成功開通一座4/5G基站,距吉隆口岸約900米,確保送達核心救援現場的通信信號更加穩定。 https://t.co/Mfuj8QBv38

    55091942149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 406 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 0.494% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 13.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 406 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 239x its own typical post.

What is 人民日報 People's Daily's engagement rate on X?
人民日報 People's Daily (@PDChinese) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 406 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,457,807 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, 人民日報 People's Daily sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PDChinese have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PDChinese post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 13.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going