Back to @OwenBenjamin's profile

Owen Benjamin 🐻 engagement report

@OwenBenjamin - 334K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.123%
of 334K followers
Per impression
2.45%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
406
interactions (median)
Saved
0.108%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 406 interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.123%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Owen Benjamin 🐻's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.123%, Owen Benjamin 🐻 sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,467 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video52% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 208 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202616x their median

    10/10 no notes https://t.co/ckB4pWAIuD

    5.9K3207646371K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202615x their median

    Trump busts lucky lutnick’s balls about his absurd 9/11 story. https://t.co/2FWHeturFp

    5.0K8911984486K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202612x their median

    My grandfather knew Pearl Harbor was a false flag while it was happening and he cleaned furnaces. Might be genetic. I don’t get how people can’t see this stuff sometimes.

    4.4K2372211860K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202612x their median

    https://t.co/ggBwp71koB

    4.3K3387822123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    This is the most important thing I’ve heard @RealCandaceO say. I hope people truly understand the cost of lies. People eat organic food but speak GMO words. Mental health hygiene should be taken very very seriously. https://t.co/2uZoyECyF7

    3.9K53321941113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.1x their median

    Wish me luck today. I’m having a 10 v 1 debate where I argue slavery is better than abortion. I don’t even see how it’s an argument but these liberal freaks think it’s better to murder Tyrone and sell his body parts to Sandra bullocks face than let him fix potholes. Insanity.

    3.0K136110750K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.5x their median

    The most terrifying thing someone can hear is “Candace Owens is making a timeline about you….”

    2.8K143127720K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.7x their median

    Holy shit I just figured out the joke behind “you will own nothing and be happy.” The original declaration was “life liberty and property” but was changed to “pursuit of happiness.” What an idiotic change. Especially when it comes to the legal system. The boys in Switzerland are highlighting this goof. You have no property rights but don’t worry, you’ll be suuuuuper happy

    2.0K201811153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.5x their median

    Two for the price of one! Really great time with the @hodgetwins huge laughs https://t.co/I1NLdgSlyp

    2.1K6190226K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.5x their median

    Blake neff has a fucking HUGE forehead. Me and @jakeshieldsajj figured out today that the Charlie Kirk show no longer puts Blake in the thumbnail cuz it doesn’t break 10k views. That’s so fucking funny

    2.1K9162695K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 406 interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.123%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Owen Benjamin 🐻's engagement rate on X?
Owen Benjamin 🐻 (@OwenBenjamin) has an engagement rate of 0.123%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 333,663 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.123%, Owen Benjamin 🐻 sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OwenBenjamin have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OwenBenjamin post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going