Back to @Ortega_Smith's profile

Javier Ortega Smith engagement report

@Ortega_Smith - 277K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.175%
of 277K followers
Per impression
5.21%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
484
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 484 interactions against 277K followers, an engagement rate of 0.175%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 5.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Javier Ortega Smith's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.175%, Javier Ortega Smith sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 353 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 2, 201855x their median

    Cuando fundamos VOX nos comprometimos a darle Voz a esa España silenciada por los partidos que viven del sistema, y lo haremos en la calle, en los medios, en los tribunales y en las instituciones. #VoxUtil #España https://t.co/7PdFV126wv

    13K9.4K3.6K321View on X
  • Jul 30, 202619x their median

    #ÚltimaHora 🔴 Meloni plantea el cierre del espacio Schengen con España por la situación migratoria en Ceuta: "Italia no se quedará de brazos cruzados. Estamos preparados para intervenir" https://t.co/gvTkV5aHZb

    6.8K2.0K291167304K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202613x their median

    Sí. https://t.co/5RHoClVGOm

    5.6K73027537K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202611x their median

    El que diga que Marruecos no es el enemigo, ese es el traidor.

    4.4K71095361K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20269.0x their median

    El último ataque de Trump a España por la OTAN: "Pronto aprenderán" https://t.co/Jhsw7gGglq

    1.9K6856311.1K3.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20268.8x their median

    ¡¡Qué vergüenza!! No hay dinero para hidroaviones para apagar nuestros incendios ni para nuestros jóvenes, que se tienen que marchar de España, y, en cambio, sí hay 25 millones de euros para regalar a quienes asaltan nuestras fronteras, generando más efecto llamada. Que los atiendan Marruecos, EEUU o Israel. Esos 25 millones de euros deberían gastarse en reforzar nuestras fronteras. TRAIDORES.

    3.0K1.1K961536K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20264.0x their median

    🇫🇷🇲🇦 | Francia establece toque de queda para menores de 16 años y se blinda en previsión de una nueva noche de disturbios multiculturales provocados por la población marroquí tras el partido contra la selección gala. https://t.co/oOQHSDSdVK

    1.5K23812255182K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.3x their median

    Sí. ¡Y Gibraltar español! 🇪🇸⚔️🇦🇷 https://t.co/wx1uJQwZEC

    1.4K15051830K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20263.3x their median

    Por los que nos precedieron, por los que vendrán. ¡Adelante, ESPAÑA! 🇪🇸 https://t.co/jLbKYXJteO

    1.4K20825954K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.8x their median

    Nos vemos mañana a las 20:00 h en Cibeles.

    1.2K12810414K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 484 interactions against 277K followers, an engagement rate of 0.175%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 5.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

What is Javier Ortega Smith's engagement rate on X?
Javier Ortega Smith (@Ortega_Smith) has an engagement rate of 0.175%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 276,977 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.175%, Javier Ortega Smith sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ortega_Smith have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ortega_Smith post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going