Back to @OpenSociety's profile

Open Society Foundations engagement report

@OpenSociety - 2.8M followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 2.8M followers
Per impression
0.222%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
1.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
76
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 60% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 191K interactions, about 2516x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gwlvoices, #unga81. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #gwlvoices, #unga81.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Open Society Foundations sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1412 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 20262516x their median

    I don’t want an AI overview, just give me the Google results! https://t.co/YyA1m9nNCM

    170K21K2623001.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026378x their median

    Today is the GOAT’s 96th birthday. Love you, dad! 🐐❤️🎂 https://t.co/0HWBTAMh9g

    13K85814K1.6K8.0M viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202612x their median

    On this day in 1865, after white Southerners had extended the enslavement of countless Black people by concealing the Civil War’s end for months, Union troops arrived in Texas. #Juneteenth https://t.co/AlNI2ZdCx6

    26616712714K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202611x their median

    “If we want to stop future wars, we must punish the states and their political and military leadership for starting them,” writes Oleksandra Matviichuk (@avalaina). In modern history we have only one precedent: the Nuremberg and Tokyo war crimes trials following World War II. Subsequent tribunals focused on war crimes but not the act of planning and initiating war. While Nuremberg and Tokyo were an essential step toward establishing accountability and justice in the last century, they have created the impression that justice is a privilege of the winners of a settled conflict. But justice is not a bonus— it is an essential human right. In May, 36 countries and the European Union committed to joining a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. The efforts were supported by the Center for Civil Liberties (@ccl_ua), the Ukrainian human rights organization led by Matviichuk. “We must break the circle of impunity and establish a special tribunal on aggression to hold them accountable, not just for people in Ukraine, but in order to prevent a next Russian attack to the next nation.”

    279116271117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20264.2x their median

    Opinion: Donald Trump’s vow to dismantle the international court will inaugurate a new era of impunity. https://t.co/HZ9K3X4VNH https://t.co/p4RKIZcfre

    21177201082K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.5x their median

    We mourn the passing of Emma Bonino, a former Open Society board member. She was a tireless advocate for human rights. May her fearlessness continue to inspire those fighting for open societies everywhere. https://t.co/cZrVnPDi4C https://t.co/BZZ87PREiy

    2173115343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.1x their median

    The Open Society Foundations are concerned that the Kenyan government’s commitment to the rule of law is under question after it disregarded a court order and denied entry this week to Brian Kagoro, Open Society’s managing director for Africa. Kenya’s High Court issued an order in June that directed the authorities to permit Kagoro to travel to the country. Kagoro was set to attend proceedings in a case regarding his deportation from Kenya in February. The court’s order made clear that he was to be allowed entry pending the outcome of the case. The decision to bar Kagoro from entering Kenya prevents him from being able to exercise his legal rights to meet his lawyers and attend any proceedings related to his case. The High Court has directed the Attorney General to explain why Kagoro was denied entry.

    106532065K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.0x their median

    Meet Nation Station: A grassroots initiative born in response to the Beirut Port explosion in 2020 that continues to show up for its communities. The day after one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, Geitawi neighborhood resident Josephine Abou Abdo and four of her neighbors gathered at an abandoned gas station on their street. They quickly started organizing, turning the gas station into a distribution point for crowdsourced bottled water, fresh fruits and vegetables, tarps, and cooked meals.  Nation Station, an Open Society grantee, became a staple in the neighborhood, with its restaurant introducing apertivo nights, hosted by migrant or refugee community kitchens to cook their specialty dishes, to generate revenue to subsidize food distribution programs.  In 2024, as the war between Israel and Hezbollah destroyed homes and infrastructure across south Lebanon, the mutual aid group launched an emergency response, cooking more than 4,000 meals a day and sending them to shelters in Beirut and Mount Lebanon. In 2026, as Israel has continued to launch attacks on southern Lebanon and other areas, triggering a mass displacement crisis that has overwhelmed state and international relief efforts, Nation Station distributed about 20,000 food packages a week to vulnerable households in heavily impacted areas. Despite the widespread destruction of homes and livelihoods and the daily threat of violence, communities in Lebanon are still coming together to support those in need. Read more about Nation Station: https://t.co/t1pHC1Dznk

    567913552K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20263.4x their median

    Happy Pride Month 🏳️‍🌈! We’re celebrating LGBTQI+ wins from across the world that are expanding protections, upholding fundamental human rights, and ensuring justice for everyone. https://t.co/fQfw4l3AGn

    741438313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.6x their median

    Brilliant piece in our ideas letter by @hanskundnani on the uses and abuses of the term populism in Europe. 😉 https://t.co/4QjBn3KNCw

    55752439K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gwlvoices#unga81

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 60% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 191K interactions, about 2516x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gwlvoices, #unga81. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Open Society Foundations's engagement rate on X?
Open Society Foundations (@OpenSociety) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,768,985 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Open Society Foundations sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OpenSociety have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @OpenSociety post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going