Back to @OpenRouter's profile

OpenRouter engagement report

@OpenRouter - 156K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.2%
of 156K followers
Per impression
1.55%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
12.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
296
interactions (median)
Saved
0.17%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 32% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

OpenRouter's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.2%, OpenRouter sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video68% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 261 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 20264.0x their median

    Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 from @XiaomiMiMo is live on OpenRouter. Three new models. A 1T+ parameter flagship, an open-source MoE, and a ~10x faster variant of the flagship. All three take text, image, video, and audio with 1M context. More in the thread 🧵 https://t.co/YlXPuOMieE

    1.1K53421671K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.8x their median

    1/ Jev, a decision model by @typesafeai, sparked a burst of projects and discussion. We tested it using Ori Eval against popular LLMs on OpenRouter at judging. Jev was >5x faster than the next fastest model, and even its slowest requests beat every other model's median. https://t.co/PeSgbMOX5a

    97062772360K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.5x their median

    1/ Last week, Jev - @typesafeai's System One model, was launched on OpenRouter. The interest was massive. We asked our community to find the most innovative ways to put fast & cheap decisions to use in their projects. And of course, we had to have Jev pick the 5 winners.

    98224231126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.5x their median

    Meet Space Bunny Alpha on OpenRouter ⚡ A flash model with fast inference, adjustable reasoning, and a 1M-token context window. It takes text, image, and video input. Give it a spin and share your feedback: https://t.co/g1XybNcJue

    839548348114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.9x their median

    Space Bunny Alpha is going temporarily offline on OpenRouter. The provider is working through an issue on their side, so we have taken the model down while they sort it out. We will bring it back as soon as it is stable and post when it is live again. Thanks for your patience.

    49911291469K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    1/ The OpenRouter Batch API is live. For work that doesn't need an answer right now, the Batch API cuts per-token pricing in half on most models and returns everything within 24 hours. Get started: https://t.co/IoIVhGaps5 https://t.co/zsNY8rkRTB

    35222221453K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Space Bunny Alpha is back online on OpenRouter. The issue is now resolved, so the model is serving again. Thanks for your patience while it was down. https://t.co/g1XybNcJue

    33311291136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    The addressable market for Decision models like Jev might be very large Chart from https://t.co/S7RXjvQHgQ https://t.co/nHN4ZGemlf

    31023201023K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Grok 4.7 from @SpaceXAI is live on OpenRouter! Their most capable model for coding and knowledge work. It works longer on hard tasks, checks its own work more carefully, and sits at the frontier of price-performance on CursorBench 4.0. Use it now: https://t.co/Mvvz9HoynM https://t.co/WKHw0cD3I9

    3141413416K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    Claude Opus 5.5 from @AnthropicAI is live on OpenRouter! The first model in the Claude 5.5 family leads Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 on agentic coding, knowledge work, and computer use, with 1M context at $4/M input and $20/M output, 20% lower per token than Opus 5. https://t.co/QRRXjPO22T

    2881920516K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 32% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

What is OpenRouter's engagement rate on X?
OpenRouter (@OpenRouter) has an engagement rate of 0.2%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 155,682 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.2%, OpenRouter sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OpenRouter have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OpenRouter post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going