Back to @OneBadDude_'s profile

One Bad Dude engagement report

@OneBadDude_ - 337K followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.068%
of 337K followers
Per impression
3.14%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
229
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 229 interactions against 337K followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 3.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134K interactions, about 584x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

One Bad Dude's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.068%, One Bad Dude sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 2026584x their median

    Being black is hard...so I killed a white boy. Being a mom is hard.....so I killed my children. Being injured is hard.....so I assassinated a CEO. Being LGBTQ is hard......so I assassinated a conservative. Time to end the excuses era. It's time for the JUSTICE ERA. https://t.co/hAY1xC6xke

    106K25K2.2K8751.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026318x their median

    Father of a girl who became disabled by an illegal migrant trucker: "I reject your guys' sympathy" Camera then pans to the Democrats This is a must see: https://t.co/RVOF9Bskzh

    64K8.4K4932471.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026160x their median

    To those who say that Enes Kanter is making a mockery of trans people...trans people have been making a mockery of women for a long time.

    33K3.2K21672278K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026108x their median

    Live execution ?? Is this where we are now ?

    16K1.3K6.5K354609K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202688x their median

    I don’t care if the holdout juror was involved in a domestic dispute. I don’t care if the holdout juror puts his pants on both legs at once. I don’t care if the holdout juror wears white after Labor Day. This man was not the one on trial. He performed his civic duties and should be commended. We cannot continue to allow the bloodthirsty mob to bully the country into submission.

    16K3.5K3086578K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202680x their median

    BREAKING: The execution of Fort Hood mass shooter Nidal Hasan by firing squad will be "made public so people can watch it," per Pete Hegseth. It will happen on December 3, at the same base where he carried out the massacre.

    16K8629469072.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202659x their median

    What are y’all plans for lunch today??? https://t.co/QCbA25TaIU

    8.9K1.8K2.0K8672.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202649x their median

    Pack it up boys, I found the biggest retard of all time. https://t.co/RhBXQnwIDg

    8.7K9231.5K184137K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202642x their median

    The polls are pushing the left. Hollywood is going hard against Trump. Musicians are suddenly getting vocal about politics. We’ve seen this before. They all fear the red wave.

    8.3K1.1K1021653K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202637x their median

    Mark Carney out here crying over memes 😭 https://t.co/gKx6dd3gYI

    6.6K1.5K246207687K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 229 interactions against 337K followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 3.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134K interactions, about 584x its own typical post.

What is One Bad Dude's engagement rate on X?
One Bad Dude (@OneBadDude_) has an engagement rate of 0.068%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 336,609 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.068%, One Bad Dude sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OneBadDude_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OneBadDude_ post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going