Iffat Omar Official engagement report
@OmarIffat - 141K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.448% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 63x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #justiceforjunaidhafeez, #freejunaidhafeez, #christian.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #justiceforjunaidhafeez, #freejunaidhafeez, #christian.
Compared with accounts its own size
Iffat Omar Official's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.013%, Iffat Omar Official sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 93% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 71% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 231 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 202663x their median
PIMS was first a hospital complex completely devoted to treat children; Japanese had financed its building. Later it was massively expanded and tragic irony is that children were found abandoned at the same hospital.
- Sep 22, 202646x their median
Today, I went to the Lahore High Court to cover the hearing of Junaid Hafeez’s appeal and after years of waiting, there was finally a substantive hearing of the case in Lahore. The court admitted the appeal and issued notices to the prosecution, asking it to address two important questions at the next hearing: the legal distinction between a Facebook page and a Facebook group, and the forensic basis for the social media posts attributed to Hafeez. The next date has yet to be fixed. But beyond the courtroom proceedings, what stayed with me was seeing Junaid’s father and brother there. His father was in tears after the hearing. For a family that has spent more than 13 years living with this case, the wait for justice has come at an enormous human cost. Junaid has remained imprisoned since his arrest in 2013 and has been on death row since his conviction in 2019. His appeal was filed in 2020. There were also people from civil society present in court in solidarity, a reminder that this case is being watched not only as a legal proceeding, but also through the lens of due process, the right to a fair and timely hearing, and the safety of everyone involved in such cases. Today’s hearing did bring some hope. But it also raised an uncomfortable question about the years that have already passed. The judges noted that notices to the parties had not been issued after the case was transferred to Lahore, and questioned why the appeal had not been properly pursued for an early hearing despite its age. For Junaid’s family, however, this is not simply an old case on a court file. It is more than 13 years of a life interrupted and years of waiting for the judicial process to reach its conclusion. The hope outside the courtroom today was simple: that the case will now move forward, the evidence will be examined, and justice will ultimately prevail.
- Aug 26, 202622x their median
Jab Shahbaz Sharif nay Mustafa Kamal ko appoint hee nahee kia toh woh fire kaisay karsaktay hain.
- Aug 26, 202621x their median
یہ پاکستان کے دارلحکومت کے سب سے بڑے ہسپتال کا حال ہے ایمرجنسی فائر ایگزٹ نہی ہے چیک کریں کیسے جا رہے فائر بریگیڈ کے پاس ایمرجنسی کرین ہوتے وہ بھی نہی ہیں آپ دنیا کے کسی ملک میں جائیں آپ کو ہر بلڈنگ میں ایمرجنسی راستے لازمی ملیں گے https://t.co/9mRHZoBHAL
- Sep 21, 202612x their median
Junaid Hafeez is innocent! Does anyone care? The trial court which convicted Junaid under religious pressure after a prolonged trial spanning 6 years, didn't care. The Lahore High Court which has lingered Junaid's Appeal for 7 years doesn't seem to care. But we, the conscientious citizens do care! We implore the Lahore High Court to remember it's constitutional duty of ensuring "expeditious justice" tomorrow on 22nd September 2026 when it hears Junaid's Appeal. We demand that the Appeal is heard and decided on merits without any further delays. We demand justice. We demand accountability for the 13 years lost of a young Fulbright Scholar under fabricated blasphemy charges. #JusticeForJunaidHafeez #ReleaseJunaidHafeez
- Aug 21, 202611x their median
Hina’s family statement. #justiceforhina https://t.co/dweYjoptaH
- Aug 23, 20268.7x their median
Please stop asking, “What has happened to our society?” or “Why are men suddenly becoming like this?” Nothing happened suddenly. Women have been murdered for decades while we kept inventing excuses for their killers—honour, family forgiveness, influence, money, endless legal delays and, when all else fails, mental illness. From Qandeel Baloch to Noor Mukadam, Sara Inam—killed by Shahnawaz Amir—and now Hina Javed, the pattern is staring us in the face. The problem isn’t some mysterious new sickness in men; the problem is impunity. When murderers believe there will be no certain, swift and unavoidable consequences—especially when wealth, connections and power can bend the system—why are we shocked that the violence continues? Stop asking what happened to society. Ask why killing a woman still doesn’t guarantee consequences. @MaryamNSharif we really believe in you plz make this case an example 🙏
- Aug 25, 20267.9x their median
Not all men but ALWAYS a man.
- Sep 19, 20266.6x their median
Policy makers need to consider this article SERIOUSLY. Made me think anyway. https://t.co/UUvS5KGyDy
- Sep 15, 20262.9x their median
https://t.co/5WTvxYguLm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.448% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 63x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #justiceforjunaidhafeez, #freejunaidhafeez, #christian.
- What is Iffat Omar Official's engagement rate on X?
- Iffat Omar Official (@OmarIffat) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 140,652 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.013%, Iffat Omar Official sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @OmarIffat have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @OmarIffat post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.