Back to @OmarAgag6's profile

Omar Agag engagement report

@OmarAgag6 - 193K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 193K followers
Per impression
1.31%
6.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
90
interactions (median)
Saved
0.225%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Omar Agag's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, Omar Agag sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 262 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 22, 202434x their median

    This one candle will change your trading forever… 🧵 https://t.co/FV2vozgnAF

    2.4K34231412603K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.3x their median

    Now that prop firms are banning rewards for code usage you have a few choices: - use the firm’s default code - use your favorite influencer’s code so they can afford the Lambo payment - use code EMI at @TradingLucid @Tradeify and @MyFundedFutures to support my son’s cancer journey at no extra cost to you If you think I’m begging, I don’t care. People have no morals anymore, there’s literally guys that are pointing you to financial ruin yet you still use their code for whatever reason.

    489479528104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.6x their median

    iFVGs = gambling. But so is: - staying in a 9-5 hoping it gets better - starting a business with no plan - getting married LIVING LIFE = gambling.

    5263727227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.4x their median

    Price typically moves between liquidity and fair value gaps (FVGs): ● Liquidity → Liquidity ● Liquidity → FVG ● FVG → FVG ● FVG → Liquidity Don’t overcomplicate it.

    3462521123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.6x their median

    One good quality trade with higher risk Is much better than multiple trades with lower risk.

    271124139.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.1x their median

    Psychology issue vs skill issue How do you know which one is holding you back? Simple If you’re consistently wrong on direction you have a skill issue. If you’re consistently correct but keep messing up the trade, you have a psychology issue.

    161102117.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    2/2 on the day ✅ so glad I don’t subscribe to the whole: “one trade a day and walk away” if my strategy gives me another valid setup I’m taking it because I actually have confidence in the edge I’ve built discipline isn’t limiting yourself to an arbitrary number of trades discipline is knowing exactly what qualifies as YOUR trade and only executing when it shows up.

    9521608.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    Someone out there is about to blow a few evals in about 30 minutes.

    5601206.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    how to know if a market might range? simple if the market is trading in between a bearish H4 level and a bullish H4 level at open i know there is a chance the market will range https://t.co/vRzpbtjRc0

    492804.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Here's not only HOW to trade the Asia Session... But what time you actually want to look for a setup. Asia Session Trade Recap from Last Night. https://t.co/LkjoLi2RdW

    494406.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

What is Omar Agag's engagement rate on X?
Omar Agag (@OmarAgag6) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 193,487 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, Omar Agag sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OmarAgag6 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OmarAgag6 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going