Back to @OccupyDemocrats's profile

Occupy Democrats engagement report

@OccupyDemocrats - 738K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.141%
of 738K followers
Per impression
4.30%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
3.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.066%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.03/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 738K followers, an engagement rate of 0.141%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 4.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #corrupttrumpregime, #guardrailsforai, #gopwaronhealthcare.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #corrupttrumpregime, #guardrailsforai, #gopwaronhealthcare.

Compared with accounts its own size

Occupy Democrats's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.141%, Occupy Democrats sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video95% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1649 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 202623x their median

    In this terrible economy, I don’t know how you can afford not to vote Republican. Everybody’s talking about the $5000 dividend he promised last night, but don’t forget you still have the $5000 DOGE refund coming as well as the $2,000 tariff rebate. Are you really going to turn your nose up at $12,000?

    16K1.1K5.5K7992.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202615x their median

    Agreed. We must win the war for AI supremacy over China. They foment the ‘anti’ argument through misinformation. There’s nothing more damaging to a Democrat than agreeing with Trump AND data centers—but what’s right is right. https://t.co/rRzdz0G3qf

    12K1.3K1.7K267435K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202611x their median

    1/15 SCOOP: Trump’s “Super Intelligence” Scandal: I believe Trump’s “SI” Executive Order was ANOTHER criminal plot to enrich the Trump family. Insiders seem to have profited MILLIONS off of .si domain names before his Truth Social posts. https://t.co/A1SrN9xTKX

    8.3K2.2K2346412.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202611x their median

    BREAKING: 🇺🇸 An investigative journalist has just exposed another Trump crime family SCAM Donald Trump’s executive order to change “AI” (Artificial Intelligence) into “SI” (Super Intelligence) was a CRIMINAL SCAM to enrich himself and his Epstein class friends. They pocketed HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars by buying up and creating tens of thousands of .si web domains in the weeks BEFORE the announcement. Trump used his power as president to force the government and pressure businesses to change their terminology to make him money. This is a CRIME. Everything this scumbag does is a rotten scam. This is the most overtly corrupt presidency in history. [Find a link to the full investigation by investigative journalist Adam Cochran below]

    7.2K3.4K217229189K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.5x their median

    BREAKING: HOLY SMOKES! A jaw-dropping new poll shows Democrat Hallie Shoffner leading MAGA Senator Tom Cotton ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. This would be a political earthquake of historic proportions... The Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College Poll in question shows Shoffner at 47.4% support and Cotton at 44% with Libertarian Jeff Wadlin bringing up the rear with 3%. 5.65% are still undecided. "Arkansans aren’t changing who they are. They are changing who they are willing to vote for. You don’t have to change your party to want to change your senator," Shoffner wrote on X in response to the poll. "Arkansas deserves better than Tom Cotton. I’m a farmer, wife, mom, daughter, and small business owner who has lived rising costs and a broken system. I’m going to fight for Arkansas instead of Washington," she added. While one poll is just that, one poll, this is incredibly encouraging news. Cotton is one of the most bloodthirsty Israel First politicians in the entire Senate. He's a proud racist, a staunch opponent of expanding affordable healthcare to the American people, and betrays the people of Arkansas regularly to serve corporate interests. Meanwhile, Shoffner supports higher wages, stronger unions, lower healthcare costs, protecting Social Security and Medicare, paid family leave, affordable childcare, higher teacher pay, and stronger rural hospitals. This choice is easy, Arkansas! Hallie Shoffner will fight for you. Please ❤️ and share if you'd love to see Tom Cotton kicked to the curb!

    5.9K1.6K2018380K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.3x their median

    BREAKING: CNN's Jake Tapper boldly defends journalist Maggie Haberman after Trump launched a "disgusting" attack on her physical appearance after she broke a damaging story about him. This was one of Trump's worst rants to date... "I’m not going to repost the filth the president wrote about Maggie Haberman, but suffice it to say she’s a great person, beautiful inside and out, an incredible mom and wife and colleague, and an amazing journalist," Tapper wrote on X. "The president’s comments are disgusting and beneath the office." "We should never get used to this deterioration in our expectations for how a president should behave. Never," he added. While we certainly understand Tapper's instinct to avoid repeating the smears against his friend, we believe that the American people must never look away from the ugliness that Trump spews. We must confront each new indignity, cruelty, and degradation head on so that we are reminded why this kind of man can never be allowed into power again. To that end— "Maggot Hagerman, the Fake Reporter from The Failing New York Times, an unattractive person both inside and out, and who knows less about me than most reporters on the beat (She’s a SCAMMER!), made up a story that on September 11th, I’m not going to the World Trade Center, in New York City, because they won’t let me make a speech, and I’m going to the Pentagon in D.C., because I’m a featured speaker," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "This is more Corrupt News, I’ve been to New York many times over the years, and no one ever speaks, it’s a 'solemn ceremony!' I never even thought of what Maggot made up, and besides, I would love not to speak, because I’m speaking all the time, and this is a day to remember the victims, and their beautiful family members," he continued. "Maggot Hagerman is a PHONY, and The New York Times knows it! It will all be revealed in the lawsuit against them, and another lawsuit against the organization which gives out the now discredited Pulitzer Prize, because Maggie got one for her 'reporting' on THE RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA HOAX, which turned out to be a total CON JOB!" Trump went on, clearly enraged. "If she were ever forced to reveal her 'sources,' you will find out they either don’t exist, or didn’t say what she reported," he wrote. "She’s been falsely writing about me for years — She’s a stalker, and should be forced to turn over any and all money that she’s made through her fake reporting on me. President DONALD J. TRUMP" Haberman reported that Trump will not be attending the 25th anniversary ceremony for 9/11 at Manhattan’s National September 11 Memorial & Museum because they refused his request to give a speech. There is absolutely no reason to distrust her reporting. She's a serious, credible journalist with a sterling track record. If she's reporting this story, it's because she has rock-solid sources to drawn upon. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is a pathological liar who loves the sound of his own voice. Of course he tried to make the 9/11 commemoration event about himself. But he also knows that Haberman's reporting makes him look absolutely awful and he can scarcely afford more bad press with his approval ratings in the toilet and the midterms right around the corner. As for his attack on Haberman, at this point, is anyone still surprised? This man is an avowed misogynist. He despises women and has a long history of making insulting comments about their appearances. We can't convince this man to be anything other than what he is. Our only option is to vote his entire party out of power and prosecute him once we retake the White House. Please like and share if you stand with Maggie Haberman!

    5.5K1.8K19770165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20266.7x their median

    NEW: According to a leaked Pentagon Memo, the US Navy is running out of money and has payroll shortfalls because of Trump’s War Iran. This entire administration is a complete fucking failure. https://t.co/e8HlfO8fQG

    4.8K1.8K171115145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.6x their median

    https://t.co/YWBYLu3iwX

    3.3K1.4K773023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.4x their median

    Getting in is the easy part… THE FIX starring Zachary Levi and Liam Neeson is in theaters September 11.

    4.0K275198396.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.2x their median

    https://t.co/WCERhUIMHf

    3.0K1.2K433219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#corrupttrumpregime#guardrailsforai#gopwaronhealthcare#corrupttrumpmachine

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 738K followers, an engagement rate of 0.141%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 4.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #corrupttrumpregime, #guardrailsforai, #gopwaronhealthcare.

What is Occupy Democrats's engagement rate on X?
Occupy Democrats (@OccupyDemocrats) has an engagement rate of 0.141%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 738,401 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.141%, Occupy Democrats sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OccupyDemocrats have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OccupyDemocrats post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going