Back to @OasisProtocol's profile

Oasis 🌹 engagement report

@OasisProtocol - 280K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.044%
of 280K followers
Per impression
1.65%
7.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
124
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 485 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Oasis 🌹's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, Oasis 🌹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 203,096 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 20263.9x their median

    1/We're excited to announce that CarrotFunding now runs on @HyperliquidX. Every challenge and every funded account, on the deepest on chain order book in crypto. Better fills. More markets. Always open and transparent. https://t.co/R9Z1lzlEBu

    332446544175K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20261.5x their median

    Thanks for an incredible season with Slovenian Cycling 💙 They inspired us to keep pushing boundaries. Elite performance meets frontier technology. Follow Oasis for more. https://t.co/R8pYURhAws

    17793083K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    Privacy in Everyday Life: in Denmark, attackers spent about ten days in September looking up names, addresses and personal ID numbers for roughly 8.8 million people in the national register, living and dead. They didn't break into the register, they used the lookup access of a small private company that was allowed to search it. Your data is only as safe as the least watched account with permission to read it.

    14027758.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    We've been cooking 🧑‍🍳 On Friday we sat down for a community call to show you what's been on the stove. Nino shares where Privana stands ahead of its rollout, and Ahmed walks through how we drew the Challenge Hub winners in a way anyone can check 🔥 Watch the full call: https://t.co/vbtCB9mncB

    13523948.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    1/ The fastest way to make an AI agent useful is to give it your credentials. It is also the fastest way to find out what it does with them. A lot of agent setups start with full access and add restrictions later, if someone remembers. https://t.co/ZOF9EEXoYx

    13428608.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 2026

    The Challenge Hub is open. Predict cycling's biggest races, and earn a shot at a Canyon racing bike & other prizes. Free to enter. Make your picks: https://t.co/UKmCpxCc8u

    142166023K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    gm chat 🥱 keep those notifications on, we have some updates for you later 👀 https://t.co/0LcO2MrFWj

    128211307.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    1/ Decoded: the upgrade that only pretended to happen. On Sapphire, a contract can keep a private key in confidential storage. Useful. Unfortunately, someone can also simulate an upgrade without submitting it, which gives mischief a free trial. https://t.co/0uwraIvBcD

    12126739.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    1/ A compliance report tells you what was true on the day the auditor visited. That is not a criticism. It is the honest shape of the instrument, and most of enterprise security policy is built on instruments shaped exactly like this. https://t.co/z5DR6LXLrI

    122237312K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    The Challenge Hub season is over, and the winners have been drawn 🥳🥳🥳 One lucky winner takes home the Canyon Endurance CF 5, but there are more surprises across the prize list. Thank you to everyone who spent the season picking podiums with us and the Slovenian Cycling Federation 💙 Here is the draw, start to finish ⏬

    112261416.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 485 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.

What is Oasis 🌹's engagement rate on X?
Oasis 🌹 (@OasisProtocol) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,754 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, Oasis 🌹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OasisProtocol have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OasisProtocol post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going