Oasis 🌹 engagement report
@OasisProtocol - 280K followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 485 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Oasis 🌹's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.044%, Oasis 🌹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.674% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 5, 20263.9x their median
1/We're excited to announce that CarrotFunding now runs on @HyperliquidX. Every challenge and every funded account, on the deepest on chain order book in crypto. Better fills. More markets. Always open and transparent. https://t.co/R9Z1lzlEBu
- Oct 21, 20261.5x their median
Thanks for an incredible season with Slovenian Cycling 💙 They inspired us to keep pushing boundaries. Elite performance meets frontier technology. Follow Oasis for more. https://t.co/R8pYURhAws
- Oct 18, 2026
Privacy in Everyday Life: in Denmark, attackers spent about ten days in September looking up names, addresses and personal ID numbers for roughly 8.8 million people in the national register, living and dead. They didn't break into the register, they used the lookup access of a small private company that was allowed to search it. Your data is only as safe as the least watched account with permission to read it.
- Oct 19, 2026
We've been cooking 🧑🍳 On Friday we sat down for a community call to show you what's been on the stove. Nino shares where Privana stands ahead of its rollout, and Ahmed walks through how we drew the Challenge Hub winners in a way anyone can check 🔥 Watch the full call: https://t.co/vbtCB9mncB
- Oct 1, 2026
1/ The fastest way to make an AI agent useful is to give it your credentials. It is also the fastest way to find out what it does with them. A lot of agent setups start with full access and add restrictions later, if someone remembers. https://t.co/ZOF9EEXoYx
- Jul 8, 2026
The Challenge Hub is open. Predict cycling's biggest races, and earn a shot at a Canyon racing bike & other prizes. Free to enter. Make your picks: https://t.co/UKmCpxCc8u
- Oct 19, 2026
gm chat 🥱 keep those notifications on, we have some updates for you later 👀 https://t.co/0LcO2MrFWj
- Sep 8, 2026
1/ Decoded: the upgrade that only pretended to happen. On Sapphire, a contract can keep a private key in confidential storage. Useful. Unfortunately, someone can also simulate an upgrade without submitting it, which gives mischief a free trial. https://t.co/0uwraIvBcD
- Sep 24, 2026
1/ A compliance report tells you what was true on the day the auditor visited. That is not a criticism. It is the honest shape of the instrument, and most of enterprise security policy is built on instruments shaped exactly like this. https://t.co/z5DR6LXLrI
- Oct 15, 2026
The Challenge Hub season is over, and the winners have been drawn 🥳🥳🥳 One lucky winner takes home the Canyon Endurance CF 5, but there are more surprises across the prize list. Thank you to everyone who spent the season picking podiums with us and the Slovenian Cycling Federation 💙 Here is the draw, start to finish ⏬
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 485 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.
- What is Oasis 🌹's engagement rate on X?
- Oasis 🌹 (@OasisProtocol) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,754 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.044%, Oasis 🌹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @OasisProtocol have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @OasisProtocol post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.