Back to @ORTEX's profile

ORTEX engagement report

@ORTEX - 126K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 126K followers
Per impression
0.044%
4.5K views on a typical post
Reach
3.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 126K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 0.044% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 377 interactions, about 189x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ORTEX's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, ORTEX sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 2026189x their median

    $GME short interest has rebuilt almost as quickly as it disappeared. Estimated short interest is back above 33M shares after collapsing earlier this week, while calls continue to dominate options activity. See how the setup has shifted on ORTEX: https://t.co/ACwlw99GHY

    3202029877K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026176x their median

    $GME’s setup looks very different heading into tomorrow’s earnings. Shorts have cut their exposure sharply since September 1, while the put/call ratio sits at 0.28. See where positioning stands now: https://t.co/ACwlw998Sq

    2972719875K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20267.0x their median

    $GME estimated short interest remains above 59M shares following this week's debt-for-equity transaction. Utilization has climbed to 62.7%, while the ORTEX Short Score has risen to 78.7. Latest ORTEX data: https://t.co/ACwlw998Sq

    102025.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.0x their median

    $ONDS shows a sharp divergence in positioning. Estimated live short interest stands at 45.37% of free float with 100% utilization, while calls account for more than 81% of today’s options volume. Latest ORTEX data: https://t.co/EmPSYMFcLF

    62005.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.5x their median

    $ONDS has a major new catalyst in an already crowded short setup. Ondas acquired GATE Technologies and Bron Technologies in a deal worth up to $390M, while nearly 43% of its free float remains short. One to watch closely. https://t.co/EmPSYMFcLF

    70004.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.0x their median

    $IREN is up more than 4% premarket, and the positioning is worth watching. Nearly 25% of the free float remains short with utilization above 96%, even after short interest has pulled back from recent highs. Latest ORTEX data: https://t.co/crJWsSIxaX

    60004.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.5x their median

    $TTD shorts are adding as shares extend their decline. Estimated live short interest has climbed above 19% of free float, with 10.79M shares borrowed versus 3.75M returned today. Latest ORTEX data: https://t.co/hRCihYyVVf

    22105.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.0x their median

    New FTD Data Published New Failure to Deliver (FTD) data for the first half of September is now available. Explore the latest FTD data alongside Short Interest on ORTEX: https://t.co/WinUaGwFWZ

    30104.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.0x their median

    $SPCX short interest has continued to fall, now below 21% of free float from more than 36% at the August peak. Options positioning hasn’t turned defensive either. Track the latest data on ORTEX: https://t.co/zmpRLP53XA

    30104.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.0x their median

    Last night $NVDA delivered another blowout quarter. This morning, the world's largest short position woke up to the bill: 286m shares short — $61bn — nursing a ~$3.5bn paper loss with the stock +5.7% premarket. Shorts have barely budged all week. Watch what they do next, live. Final days of our August offer — ORTEX Advanced, $7.99/mo: https://t.co/cAMAwhsDZL

    30014.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 126K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 0.044% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 377 interactions, about 189x its own typical post.

What is ORTEX's engagement rate on X?
ORTEX (@ORTEX) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 126,495 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, ORTEX sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ORTEX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ORTEX post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going