Back to @OPDhankar's profile

Om Prakash DhankarЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ engagement report

@OPDhankar - 169K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.014%
of 169K followers
Per impression
3.54%
650 views on a typical post
Reach
0.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
23
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 650 times each, and 3.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.385% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Om Prakash DhankarЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│'s engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Om Prakash DhankarЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 20262.6x their median

    рд╕реБрдкреНрд░рд╕рд┐рджреНрдз рд▓реЗрдЦрд┐рдХрд╛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рд╡рдзреБ рдЬреАрдирд╛ рдЪрд╣рд▓ рдзрд░реНрдордкрддреНрдиреА рд╕реБрдкреБрддреНрд░ рдЖрджрд┐рддреНрдп рдзрдирдЦрдбрд╝ рдХреЛ рдЬрдиреНрдорджрд┐рди рдХреА рд╣рд╛рд░реНрджрд┐рдХ рдордВрдЧрд▓рдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБ редЁЯМ╕ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╕ https://t.co/iKVhdMbORu

    514502.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.0x their median

    рднрд╛рд░рддреАрдп рдЬрдирддрд╛ рдкрд╛рд░реНрдЯреА @BJP4India рдХреЗ рд░рд╛рд╖реНрдЯреНрд░реАрдп рд╕рдЪрд┐рд╡ рдПрд╡рдВ рд╡рд░рд┐рд╖реНрда рд╕рдВрдЧрдардирдХрд░реНрддрд╛ рдЖрджрд░рдгреАрдп рд╢реНрд░реА @OPDhankar рдЬреА рдХреЛ рдЬрдиреНрдорджрд┐рди рдХреА рд╣рд╛рд░реНрджрд┐рдХ рд╢реБрднрдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБред рдЖрдкрдХрд╛ рдХреБрд╢рд▓ рдиреЗрддреГрддреНрд╡, рд╕рдВрдЧрдарди рдХреЗ рдкреНрд░рддрд┐ рд╕рдорд░реНрдкрдг рдФрд░ рд░рд╛рд╖реНрдЯреНрд░рд╕реЗрд╡рд╛ рдХрд╛ рднрд╛рд╡ рд╣рдо рд╕рднреА рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рджреИрд╡ рдкреНрд░реЗрд░рдгрд╛рд╕реНрд░реЛрдд рдмрдирд╛ рд░рд╣реЗред рдИрд╢реНрд╡рд░ рд╕реЗ рдЖрдкрдХреЗ рдЙрддреНрддрдо рд╕реНрд╡рд╛рд╕реНрдереНрдп, рджреАрд░реНрдШрд╛рдпреБ рдПрд╡рдВ рдпрд╢рд╕реНрд╡реА рдЬреАрд╡рди рдХреА рдордВрдЧрд▓рдХрд╛рдордирд╛ рдХрд░рддрд╛ рд╣реВрдБред

    261461682 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.0x their median

    рдЧрдгреЗрд╢ рдЪрддреБрд░реНрдереА рдХреА рд╣рд╛рд░реНрджрд┐рдХ рдордВрдЧрд▓рдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБ ЁЯМ╕ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╗ЁЯк╖ЁЯк╖ЁЯк╖ЁЯк╗ЁЯк╗ЁЯк╗ https://t.co/XsVgOWiAKL

    35820946 viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.0x their median

    рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреЗ рд╡рд┐рдЬреЗрддрд╛рдУрдВ рдХрд╛ рднрд╛рд░рдд рдореЗрдВ рдЕрднрд┐рдирдВрджрди ЁЯМ╕ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╕рд╣рд░рд┐рдпрд╛рдгрд╛ рдХреЗ рдЦрд┐рд▓рд╛рдбрд╝рд┐рдпреЛрдВ рдХрд╛ рд╣рд░рд┐ рдХреА рдзрд░рд╛ рдкрд░ рд╕реНрд╡рд╛рдЧрдд ЁЯЩПЁЯЩП https://t.co/mG6dimzm2F

    367111.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.9x their median

    #рдЖрд╢реАрд░реНрд╡рд╛рдж_рдХрд╛_рджреАрдпрд╛ рд╕реЗрд╡рд╛ рджрд┐рд╡рд╕ рдкрд░ рд▓реЛрдХрдкреНрд░рд┐рдп рдкреНрд░рдзрд╛рдирдордВрддреНрд░реА рд╢реНрд░реА @narendramodi рдЬреА рдХреЗ рдкрд╛рд╡рди рдЬрдиреНрдорджрд┐рд╡рд╕ рдкрд░ ред NCI рдмрд╛рдврд╕рд╛ рдЭрдЬреНрдЬрд░ , G99 , рдПрд╡рдВ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдирд┐рд╡рд╛рд╕ рдкрд░ рджреАрдкреЛрддреНрд╕рд╡ ЁЯкФЁЯкФЁЯлб https://t.co/1RkeECmBRv

    329211.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.9x their median

    рд╣рд╛рд░ рдирд╣реАрдВ рдорд╛рдиреВрдБрдЧрд╛, рд░рд╛рд░ рдирд╣реАрдВ рдард╛рдиреВрдБрдЧрд╛. рдХрд╛рд▓ рдХреЗ рдХрдкрд╛рд▓ рдкрд░ , рд▓рд┐рдЦрддрд╛ рд╣реВрдБ рдорд┐рдЯрд╛рддрд╛ рд╣реВрдБ, рдЧреАрдд рдирдпрд╛ рдЧрд╛рддрд╛ рд╣реВрдБ ред рдкреБрдгреНрдп рддрд┐рдерд┐ рдкрд░ рднрд╛рд╡рднреАрдиреА рд╢реНрд░рджреНрдзрд╛рдВрдЬрд▓рд┐ ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╕ЁЯМ╝ https://t.co/Hf1AEBffhv

    346312.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20261.8x their median

    рдХрд┐рд╕рд╛рдиреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рд╣рд┐рддреИрд╖реА- рднрд╛рд░рддреАрдп рд╕рд┐рдиреЗрдорд╛ рдХреЗ рд╕рд╢рдХреНрдд, рд╕рдВрд╡реЗрджрдирд╢реАрд▓ рдФрд░ рдЕрджреНрд╡рд┐рддреАрдп рдЕрднрд┐рдиреЗрддрд╛ рд╢реНрд░реА рдирд╛рдирд╛ рдкрд╛рдЯреЗрдХрд░ рдЬреА рдХреЗ рдирд┐рдзрди рдХрд╛ рд╕рдорд╛рдЪрд╛рд░ рдЕрддреНрдпрдВрдд рджреБрдГрдЦрдж рд╣реИред рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдкреНрд░рднрд╛рд╡рд╢рд╛рд▓реА рдЕрднрд┐рдирдп, рдмреЗрдмрд╛рдХ рд╡реНрдпрдХреНрддрд┐рддреНрд╡ рдФрд░ рд╕рд╛рдорд╛рдЬрд┐рдХ рд╕рд░реЛрдХрд╛рд░реЛрдВ рдХреЗ рдорд╛рдзреНрдпрдо рд╕реЗ рдЙрдиреНрд╣реЛрдВрдиреЗ рдХрд░реЛрдбрд╝реЛрдВ рд▓реЛрдЧреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рд╣реГрджрдп рдореЗрдВ рдПрдХ рд╡рд┐рд╢реЗрд╖ рд╕реНрдерд╛рди рдмрдирд╛рдпрд╛ред рдЙрдирдХрд╛ рдЬрд╛рдирд╛ рднрд╛рд░рддреАрдп рдХрд▓рд╛ рдПрд╡рдВ рд╕рд┐рдиреЗрдорд╛ рдЬрдЧрдд рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдЕрдкреВрд░рдгреАрдп рдХреНрд╖рддрд┐ рд╣реИред рдИрд╢реНрд╡рд░ рджрд┐рд╡рдВрдЧрдд рдЖрддреНрдорд╛ рдХреЛ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рд╢реНрд░реАрдЪрд░рдгреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реНрдерд╛рди рдкреНрд░рджрд╛рди рдХрд░реЗрдВ рддрдерд╛ рдЙрдирдХреЗ рдкрд░рд┐рдЬрдиреЛрдВ рдФрд░ рдЕрд╕рдВрдЦреНрдп рдкреНрд░рд╢рдВрд╕рдХреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдЗрд╕ рджреБрдГрдЦ рдХреЛ рд╕рд╣рди рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдХреА рд╢рдХреНрддрд┐ рджреЗрдВред рднрд╛рд╡рднреАрдиреА рд╢реНрд░рджреНрдзрд╛рдВрдЬрд▓рд┐ред реР рд╢рд╛рдВрддрд┐ред ЁЯЩП

    27941810 viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.8x their median

    80 рд╡реЗрдВ рд╕реНрд╡рддрдВрддреНрд░рддрд╛ рджрд┐рд╡рд╕ рдХреА рд╣рд╛рд░реНрджрд┐рдХ рд╢реБрднрдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБ ред рдЙрди рд╕рдорд╕реНрдд рд╡реАрд░реЛрдВ рдЬрд┐рдиреНрд╣реЛрдВрдиреЗ рджреЗрд╢ рдХреА рдЖрдЬрд╝рд╛рджреА рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдЕрдкрдирд╛ рдмрд▓рд┐рджрд╛рди рджрд┐рдпрд╛ ред рдЬрд┐рдиреНрд╣реЛрдВрдиреЗ рджреЗрд╢ рдХреА рд╕реБрд░рдХреНрд╖рд╛ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдпреЗ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдкреНрд░рд╛рдгреЛ рдХреЛ рдиреНрдпреЛрдЫрд╛рд╡рд░ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЙрди рд╕рдорд╕реНрдд рд╡реАрд░реЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдирдорди ЁЯМ╕ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╝ЁЯМ╕ https://t.co/uMVwyG5poe

    28670669 viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.7x their median

    рд░рд┐рд╢реНрддреЛрдВ рдХреА рдЗрд╕ рдкреНрдпрд╛рд░реА рдбреЛрд░ рдХрд╛, рд╕рдмрд╕реЗ рд╕реБрдВрджрд░ рдирд╛рдо рд╣реИ рд░рд╛рдЦреА, рдмрдЪрдкрди рдХреА рдореАрдареА рдпрд╛рджреЛрдВ рд╕реЗ рдЖрдЬ рддрдХ рдорд╣рдХрддреА рд░рд╛рдЦреАред рд╕рд░реЛрдЬ рдХрд╛ рд╕реНрдиреЗрд╣, рдкреНрд░рдорд┐рд▓рд╛ рдХрд╛ рдкреНрд░реЗрдо , рдЙрд░реНрдорд┐рд▓рд╛ рдХрд╛ рдЕрдкрдирд╛рдкрди , рд╢рд░реНрдорд┐рд▓рд╛ рдХреА рдореАрдареА рдореБрд╕реНрдХрд╛рди, рдореАрд░рд╛ рдХрд╛ рдорди рдорд╣рд╛рдиред рдФрд░ рдХрд╡рд┐рддрд╛тАФрдЬреИрд╕реЗ рдирд╛рдо рд╣реА рдХрд╡рд┐рддрд╛, рдЬрд┐рд╕рдореЗрдВ рд╕рд┐рдордЯреА рд╣реИ рдЖрддреНрдореАрдпрддрд╛ред рд╕рд░реЛрдЬ, рдкреНрд░рдорд┐рд▓рд╛, рдЙрд░реНрдорд┐рд▓рд╛, рд╢рд░реНрдорд┐рд▓рд╛, рдореАрд░рд╛ рдФрд░ рдХрд╡рд┐рддрд╛тАФ рдЖрдк рд╕рднреА рдХреЗ рд╕реНрдиреЗрд╣ рд╕реЗ рд╣реА рддреНрдпреМрд╣рд╛рд░ рдХреА рдЦреБрд╢рд┐рдпрд╛рдБ рдкреВрд░реА рд╣реИрдВред рд░рдХреНрд╖рд╛рдмрдВрдзрди рдХреА рд╣рд╛рд░реНрджрд┐рдХ рд╢реБрднрдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБред ЁЯМ║

    295402.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.6x their median

    рдЖрдЬ @BJP4India рдХреЗрдВрджреНрд░реАрдп рдХрд╛рд░реНрдпрд╛рд▓рдп рдкрд░ рдорд╛рдиреНрдп рд░рд╛рд╖реНрдЯреНрд░реАрдп рдЕрдзреНрдпрдХреНрд╖ @NitinNabin рдЬреА рдиреЗ рддрд┐рд░рдВрдЧрд╛ ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ рдлрд╣рд░рд╛рдпрд╛ ред рд╕рдорд╛рд░реЛрд╣ рдореЗрдВ рдкрд╛рд░реНрдЯреА рдХреЗ рдЧрдгрдорд╛рдиреНрдп рдиреЗрддрд╛рдУрдВ рд╕рд╛рджрд░ рдЙрдкрд╕реНрдерд┐рдд рд░рд╣реА ред https://t.co/UR2JJgod9f

    27621754 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 650 times each, and 3.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.385% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

What is Om Prakash DhankarЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│'s engagement rate on X?
Om Prakash DhankarЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ (@OPDhankar) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 168,661 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Om Prakash DhankarЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│ sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OPDhankar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OPDhankar post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going