Back to @ONTOWallet's profile

ONTO - The Data Wallet for AI & Web3 engagement report

@ONTOWallet - 179K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.009%
of 179K followers
Per impression
1.63%
1.0K views on a typical post
Reach
0.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0.096%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 179K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 1.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.585% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 3385x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, ONTO - The Data Wallet for AI & Web3 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 294 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 14, 20263385x their median

    https://t.co/vLmiBKTtX3

    42K8.1K2.9K4.6K71M viewsView on X
  • May 8, 202633x their median

    šŸŽ® $500 up for grabs to celebrate ONTO Steam verification going live. ONTO Wallet v4.10.0 also ships a restructured Profile and the prepares for the first @PalzGame data campaign ($2K+ pool). Full release blog: https://t.co/rBRc8zTCzg https://t.co/pFHfUEtsCI

    1901432051621K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20263.9x their median

    šŸ’³ ONTO x @SPACEID is going live. 100 gift cards at $5 each. $500 in gift cards total. No quest, no mint. For real cross-chain users: āœ… Wallet over 1 year old āœ… Assets across 3+ chains Connect, authorize, qualify. 7 days. → https://t.co/2PjQnjBanA https://t.co/EWUR0mPkkT

    41131026.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20262.5x their median

    Eight years ago, the Ontology MainNet went live. It has not stopped since. But this anniversary is not about looking back. It is about what all of it was building toward: verified human data for the AI economy. 🧵 https://t.co/LgqdygIVT1

    237858.1K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20262.4x their median

    Ontology turns 8 ⚽ Guess the World Cup winner and join a $2,500 ONG reward pool. Verify your ONT staking data in ONTO Wallet, lock in your pick, and stake higher to climb the tiers. Predictions close 14 July, winners revealed at the final on 20 July. https://t.co/ewM1ImjccB https://t.co/aI8CL1XFba

    2311337.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20262.3x their median

    šŸŽ® PALZ Round 2 is live on ONTO. Two ways to qualify this round. Connect your Steam account, then add Discord OR Twitch in ONTO. Meet the criteria, claim your rewards with @PalzGame. Basic Package (every qualifier): šŸŖ™ $5 worth of PEPZ šŸŽ Beta cosmetics Gamer Package (limited, 15 only): šŸŖ™ $10 worth of PEPZ šŸ† Golden Beta cosmetics ā¬†ļø Instant level 5 Open now → closes 8 July. Connect in ONTO: https://t.co/Mg1kcOGOa8 Full rules: https://t.co/Vza5UDXmQF

    306125.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 20261.9x their median

    Your model passed safety review because humans were in the loop. An auditor asks you to prove it. Not "describe your process". Prove it. Can you name the specific people, show they were distinct real humans, and produce signed, timestamped records of what each one judged? Most labs cannot.

    224427.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20261.8x their median

    Closing Issue 02. The week opened with the METR teardown. It closes with the two threads still open: chronic sybil contamination in preference data, and the agent decision evaluation vacuum nobody has named yet. Both solved by the same primitive. 🧵 https://t.co/6NKfnm3Y9Z

    174633.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.6x their median

    Robinhood Chain is now supported in ONTO Wallet. Hold, send and receive Robinhood Chain assets in the same wallet that holds your identity and your data. No new seed phrase, no second app. https://t.co/Kj71va7cwh

    164432.6K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 20261.5x their median

    The published research is in. AI-mediated communication systems measurably shift the opinions of the groups they serve. Polish, suggest, summarise, rewrite. Each tap nudges. The aggregate shifts. "Did this person say this thing" is becoming a real question. 🧵 on the architecture that answers it.

    147324.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 179K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 1.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.585% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 3385x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is ONTO - The Data Wallet for AI & Web3's engagement rate on X?
ONTO - The Data Wallet for AI & Web3 (@ONTOWallet) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 178,527 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, ONTO - The Data Wallet for AI & Web3 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ONTOWallet have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ONTOWallet post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going