OMGFacts engagement report
@OMGFacts - 5.2M followers on X
Measured over 203 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 203 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.062% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.339% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 203 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 252 interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #omgfacts, #kindness, #education.
Measured over 203 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #omgfacts, #kindness, #education.
Compared with accounts its own size
OMGFacts's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, OMGFacts sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Nov 8, 202423x their median
Ready to be the random fact wizard of 2025? Our new calendar just dropped on Amazon! 🤓 Each day = one more "wait, WHAT?" moment 🤯 https://t.co/oDx1xkB7oO
- Aug 22, 20269.4x their median
🗻 Japanese couple ducked for a stranger's photo In 1993, they crouched so he could shoot Mt. Fuji. A tiny gesture, big kindness. Sources: CNN, Japan Times #omgfacts #MountFuji #JapanTravel https://t.co/EL58oKaqkW
- Aug 16, 20268.0x their median
🏥 All-male room debated women's health care. White House meeting had zero women present. Women left out of the room. Sources: NYT, CNN #omgfacts #WomensHealth #HealthCare https://t.co/nVATYAvkP4
- Aug 22, 20267.9x their median
🐾 Ryan Gosling's dog rode shotgun for 17 years. George, a shelter dog, joined every set and press tour. A rescue dog's lasting legacy Sources: ET, People #omgfacts #ryangosling #doglovers https://t.co/Ca8Jx0owaT
- Aug 28, 20267.5x their median
🌱 Louis Vuitton ditched animal fur for plants. New material uses hemp, flax, and nettle fibers. Luxury just got greener. Sources: LVMH, Vogue Business #omgfacts #LouisVuitton #Sustainable https://t.co/NsDmX8XqUx
- Aug 15, 20265.8x their median
💰 MacKenzie Scott gave away $26.3B by 2025. No foundation, no wait. Direct cash to nonprofits. No strings. Just impact. Sources: AP, TIME #omgfacts #MacKenzieScott #Philanthropy https://t.co/zP6xD5iegz
- Aug 22, 20265.5x their median
🏥 A twin's hug saved her dying sister's life. In 1995, a nurse placed preemie twins together. It changed NICU care forever. Sources: CNN, Worcester Telegram #omgfacts #NICU #Twins #RescuingHug https://t.co/owDj70pp5l
- Aug 20, 20265.3x their median
🎬 Adam Sandler casts his wife in nearly everything. They met filming Big Daddy in 1999. Love, laughs, and cameos. Sources: People, EW #omgfacts #AdamSandler #HappyMadison https://t.co/yjZupkvKqK
- Aug 21, 20264.9x their median
🐾 Boy secretly filmed hugging stray dogs daily. Ibrahim in Grozny greets two strays every morning. Kindness needs no audience. Sources: Independent, Daily Mail #omgfacts #kindness #straydogs https://t.co/9bL23R8Nh8
- Aug 16, 20264.7x their median
🫡 A soldier's first stop: dad's food cart. Reynaldo Malto sold snacks 20+ yrs to fund his son's studies in Laguna, PH. Success isn't built alone. #omgfacts #military #Philippines #Family https://t.co/Ihfbeeguth
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 203 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.062% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.339% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 203 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 252 interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #omgfacts, #kindness, #education.
- What is OMGFacts's engagement rate on X?
- OMGFacts (@OMGFacts) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 203 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,249,451 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, OMGFacts sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @OMGFacts have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @OMGFacts post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.77 posts per day across the measured window.