Back to @OMGFacts's profile

OMGFacts engagement report

@OMGFacts - 5.2M followers on X

Measured over 313 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 5.2M followers
Per impression
0.107%
7.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
10.43/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 313 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.107% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.143% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 313 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265 interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #omgfacts, #ai, #science.

Measured over 313 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #omgfacts, #ai, #science.

Compared with accounts its own size

OMGFacts's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, OMGFacts sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 206 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 8, 202429x their median

    Ready to be the random fact wizard of 2025? Our new calendar just dropped on Amazon! 🤓 Each day = one more "wait, WHAT?" moment 🤯 https://t.co/oDx1xkB7oO

    52198141259K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202613x their median

    🗻 Japanese couple ducked for a stranger's photo In 1993, they crouched so he could shoot Mt. Fuji. A tiny gesture, big kindness. Sources: CNN, Japan Times #omgfacts #MountFuji #JapanTravel https://t.co/EL58oKaqkW

    9651132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202612x their median

    🐕 Stray dog dove 7 times to save her pups. During flash floods in India, she rescued each one. Motherhood beats any flood. Sources: NDTV, ToI #omgfacts #animalrescue #straydogs https://t.co/33rRbyr2t6

    8980024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202611x their median

    🏥 All-male room debated women's health care. White House meeting had zero women present. Women left out of the room. Sources: NYT, CNN #omgfacts #WomensHealth #HealthCare https://t.co/nVATYAvkP4

    62169125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202611x their median

    🐾 Ryan Gosling's dog rode shotgun for 17 years. George, a shelter dog, joined every set and press tour. A rescue dog's lasting legacy Sources: ET, People #omgfacts #ryangosling #doglovers https://t.co/Ca8Jx0owaT

    8240125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202610x their median

    🐾 Brazil now jails pet abusers. Harming dogs or cats can mean 2-5 years in prison. Justice finally has teeth. Sources: Reuters, Rio Times #omgfacts #Brazil #AnimalRights #Law https://t.co/odSflNDSq5

    68101117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20268.0x their median

    💰 MacKenzie Scott gave away $26.3B by 2025. No foundation, no wait. Direct cash to nonprofits. No strings. Just impact. Sources: AP, TIME #omgfacts #MacKenzieScott #Philanthropy https://t.co/zP6xD5iegz

    5437042K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.5x their median

    🌱 Louis Vuitton ditched animal fur for plants. New material uses hemp, flax, and nettle fibers. Luxury just got greener. Sources: LVMH, Vogue Business #omgfacts #LouisVuitton #Sustainable https://t.co/NsDmX8XqUx

    5631013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.5x their median

    🏥 A twin's hug saved her dying sister's life. In 1995, a nurse placed preemie twins together. It changed NICU care forever. Sources: CNN, Worcester Telegram #omgfacts #NICU #Twins #RescuingHug https://t.co/owDj70pp5l

    5820026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20267.4x their median

    🍌 This banana tastes like vanilla ice cream. The Blue Java grows in Hawaii's volcanic soil. Nature's own dessert. Sources: Hawaii Mag, UF IFAS #omgfacts #BlueJava #Hawaii #Foodie https://t.co/HXs9QEsk1Q

    5270030K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#omgfacts#ai#science#neuroscience#history

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 313 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.107% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.143% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 313 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265 interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #omgfacts, #ai, #science.

What is OMGFacts's engagement rate on X?
OMGFacts (@OMGFacts) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 313 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,237,374 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, OMGFacts sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @OMGFacts have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @OMGFacts post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going