Back to @NxtCypher's profile

Cypher engagement report

@NxtCypher - 176K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 176K followers
Per impression
1.00%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
9.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
159
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 159 interactions against 176K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 9.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tag: #everywincounts.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cypher's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Cypher sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,566 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,566 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,933 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link46% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 46% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 350 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 20269.8x their median

    Rankz just crossed $100K in volume with 1,219 crates opened. $2,960 paid out from the Pot. $1,350 refunded through free pulls. The next few days should be interesting. Especially if your name is on the whitelist. Live on @RobinhoodCrypto https://t.co/ficr8v8b8M

    5103466693219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20263.2x their median

    Gold averaged 37% more in Q2 2026 than a year earlier, and the world's mines could only produce 2% more. Miners have every reason to dig more at these prices, but S&P Global puts the average gold mine at about 15 years from discovery to production. Still only a modest rise in supply is expected this year. Usually, a stake in gold that's still in the ground means backing a mine project and waiting out those years. The in-situ gold behind $GGBR has already been found and documented, so you get the exposure without the wait.

    1921311671320K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 20252.8x their median

    BTC → ETH → ALTCOINS → MICROS → REPEAT This is exactly how liquidity flows but it's not that simple anymore. We’re in a risk-off market and tariffs + macro fear on CT I'm breaking down how money flows (especially in this cycle) 🧵 https://t.co/UkEwWkYuU6

    2967149043K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.1x their median

    2,000+ people have now used the Note Systems protocol. 2x growth in the last 96 hours. 24,500+ deposits across 48 notes. 21.5M+ $USDG tracked on-chain. Structured notes didn't even exist on-chain a few weeks ago. Now there's a market. Join in: https://t.co/QfSogLAGBl https://t.co/YIMpBkc02x

    22854421121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.1x their median

    i really can't tell you where gold goes next. what i can tell you are what big institutions have been doing for two years. pboc added 20.2 tonnes in august. 22 months in a row and about 80 tonnes this year. you do not need a central bank balance sheet to own the same metal. 1 ggbr = 1/1000th of a troy ounce of insitu gold. spot near $4,396/oz → token near $4.36 (under $5). mind you, reserves are insitu meaning certified gold left in the ground. it's overcollateralized beyond 100%, audited by @CertiK and @cyfrin. https://t.co/loUYGn1kJb · https://t.co/SatQOWXSfG · @goldfishggbr

    1560171026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.7x their median

    icymi... last week, the fed raised interest rates (by 0.25%) and said it could go up again this year. because of that, gold was down about ~1%... and it's right back up lol. a quarter point makes cash look a bit better for a year. it does not make cash hold its value. big banks still want those prices to go up, so the money in your account is meant to buy less over time. that is true at 0% and it is true at 4%. now ask yourself 'what has your cash bought ten years prior?' rent? groceries? a tank of fuel? what interest rate would actually fix that over a decade? not this one obviously. remove btc, the thing i'm hodling in the long run is gold. owning gold the old way is such a drag tho, that's why ethereum:0x7e2ac793f3e692f388e66c7dc28f739d13b0b71a for gold works for me. one token is 1/1000th of an ounce, so you can hold any size you want (in your wallet) price is public on @CoinMarketCap, @coingecko and @dexscreener. the code has also been run through @CertiK and @cyfrin. https://t.co/loUYGn1kJb / https://t.co/SatQOWXSfG

    1411131014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.7x their median

    study base:0x19e8d59ff3d7a31289e0dc04db48d43b02c7ffa6 + venus v0.3.0 is live (the fastest ever) + last splash is still on (10 cysors get base:0x19e8d59ff3d7a31289e0dc04db48d43b02c7ffa6) + partner for the bitget hackathon S2 + something is coming on cyops + dogebox1 multipliers + batch 2 still moving + dark pool coming soon there's quite a lot going on the 'coming soon's. still... it's gonna be a good week. @cysic_xyz

    1260141117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    UTOPIA 3x (early access + 500 TOP) giveaway: + follow @zheninjaweb3 & @UtopiaWeb3AG + rt this tweet + tag 3 friends in the comments + join the discord fulfill all the tasks to be eligible! winners will be selected in 48 hours! https://t.co/WNRFqh6pUo https://t.co/zkDgTHrn7T

    1421284016K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    so I just finished setting up my svp rewards tab. it took less than 3 mins. + visit https://t.co/0xaa3hzZT1 + connect wallet + link x + follow @SvpChain + Joined tg + discord that was it! september is for rewards. points now —> $svp later. https://t.co/XrbLqYn5O7

    1071100015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    i think i just struck gold with this one... a friend of mine told me to try out @trymira a while ago and i'm kinda annoyed i waited so long. mira is an ai assistant that is integrated on telegram (sounds ordinary but it ain't) used it for a few days and this is the most frictionless ai I’ve used. it's smoother, faster and more practical than chatgpt or claude for everyday life. now i use it to create a content plan (because i got no time lol) and it even prepped several drafts to choose from. ... and it can do much more. brainstorming, drafting emails, image, video & music generation, transcribe audio, live web searches, you name it! the free tier feels premium because i've been using it everyday for weeks. open telegram → search @mira → say hi. that’s it!

    103790017K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#everywincounts

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 159 interactions against 176K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 9.8x its own typical post.

What is Cypher's engagement rate on X?
Cypher (@NxtCypher) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 176,109 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Cypher sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,566 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NxtCypher have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NxtCypher post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going