Back to @Numerama's profile

Numerama engagement report

@Numerama - 205K followers on X

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 205K followers
Per impression
0.115%
1.7K views on a typical post
Reach
0.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.115% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 568x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #numerama, #airtag, #apple.

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #numerama, #airtag, #apple.

Compared with accounts its own size

Numerama's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Numerama sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link90% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 90% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 212 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 2026568x their median

    Cette voiture chinoise coûte plus de 100 000 euros mais regardez ce qui arrive à sa pédale de frein pendant un freinage d'urgence... Suivez 👉 @numerama pour anticiper l'avenir ! -- #voiture #numerama #maextroV800 https://t.co/pAn35eVgGq

    1.0K902210100K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026367x their median

    Le moteur de recherche berlinois Ecosia, vitrine de la « tech verte et européenne », remplace le champion français Mistral par des modèles chinois. Parmi ses griefs : la qualité, la souveraineté… et le nucléaire. Quand on voit la tête du mix énergétique allemand, il fallait oser. https://t.co/o0hzfII1AD

    533143362129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026111x their median

    iOS 27 arrive dès ce soir sur les iPhone 11 et modèles plus récents, avec plein de nouveautés : Apple Intelligence dans Photos, Liquid Glass amélioré, glow up de Flyover ... mais pas de Siri AI en Europe📱 Suivez 👉 @numerama pour anticiper l'avenir ! -- #iphone #ios27 #apple #numerama

    18931117.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026104x their median

    Ce petit accessoire va vous faire économiser de l'argent... Voici le Xiaomi Smart Tag ! Suivez 👉 @numerama pour anticiper l'avenir ! -- #airtag #xiaomi #numerama https://t.co/dGw86OqGZP

    187164110K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202693x their median

    Orange lance un décodeur télé pas comme les autres, on vous explique tout. Une vidéo de décryptage plus complète demain sur YouTube ! Suivez 👉 @numerama pour anticiper l'avenir ! -- #orange #box #numerama https://t.co/dT3VSUi5y0

    163129224K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202640x their median

    On a testé la montre Huawei Watch D3 avec le bracelet gonflable et on vous dit tout ce qu'on en a pensé ! Suivez 👉 @numerama pour anticiper l'avenir ! -- #huawei #montre #numerama https://t.co/Am7ETRoVgm

    754005.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202639x their median

    Cette Tesla en FSD Supervisé sillonne une petite route de montagne en Europe. Arrivée au bord d'un ravin escarpé, elle croise des véhicules en face. Le conducteur, confiant, la laisse manœuvrer et elle s'approche du bord de la falaise : en manœuvrant, elle gagne quelques centimètres à chaque fois, s'arrêtant au bord du précipice et gérant la situation avec brio. Ce genre de vidéos sont nouvelles, car les routes européennes ne sont pas du tout similaires aux routes américaines. Ici, on voit clairement un des cas-limites sur une route de montagne qu'on connaît très bien en France. En Slovénie, le FSD supervisé vient d'être autorisé et les voitures font déjà des manœuvres impressionnantes 🚙 Suivez 👉 @numerama pour anticiper l'avenir ! -- #tesla #auto #fsd #numerama

    6610206.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202635x their median

    Effaré, il découvre par hasard que la cafetière connectée de ses parents envoie « un téraoctet de données en dix jours » https://t.co/8o0GckwykC

    48143512K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202624x their median

    En Europe, le FSD s'appellera « Tesla Conduite Assistée ». Une manière de bien souligner que le logiciel est une aide à la conduite et non un système complètement autonome. Une décision qui intervient après la réunion du 6 octobre du TCMV et qui suggère une homologation générale de la fonctionnalité. https://t.co/xyH8qNJhSZ

    318713.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202617x their median

    Un propriétaire slovène de Tesla qui roulait en FSD sur une étroite route de montagne a publié un extrait périlleux de son trajet. Proche du ravin, la voiture a réussi à manœuvrer avec brio pour laisser passer des véhicules arrivant en face. Les images sont impressionnantes. https://t.co/bCaCybwse6

    257103.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#numerama#airtag#apple#box#geographie

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.115% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 90% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 568x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #numerama, #airtag, #apple.

What is Numerama's engagement rate on X?
Numerama (@Numerama) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 79 original posts from the last 30 days against 205,089 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Numerama sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Numerama have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Numerama post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going