PlayerSells
Back to @Noturhoneybb's profile

bels 🧷 engagement report

@Noturhoneybb - 931K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.35%
of 931K followers
Per impression
5.98%
211K views on a typical post
Reach
22.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.333%
703 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 13K interactions against 931K followers, an engagement rate of 1.35%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 211K times each, and 5.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 344K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

bels 🧷's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.35%, bels 🧷 sits above the 75th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.325% to 2.60%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +9%7.2K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 66 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 8, 202627x their median

    I just fucked the baddest bitch ever but some of you might call it masturbation.

    308K34K5958054.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202619x their median

    turns out the honeymoon phase lasts forever when your bf isn’t a fkn loser

    215K21K3008773.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202614x their median

    you can just say "okay" when someone tells you to do something and not do it. i learned that from men

    163K18K2937771.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20268.9x their median

    and i still wanna kno what future meant by she not a lesbian for p she turn pesbian

    108K4.5K2284694.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20268.1x their median

    My ex should be serving life in prison for animal abuse for the way she treated the goat

    92K9.5K1841892.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20267.6x their median

    THE MOON IS HUGE AND PINK RN https://t.co/r7ToczqNKz

    88K6.7K2133691.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20267.2x their median

    HOW LIFE FEELS AFTER SUCCESSFULLY DIGGING YOURSELF OUT OF THE HOLE NOBODY KNEW YOU WERE IN. https://t.co/nOesfkStck

    78K12K2364261.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20266.6x their median

    tuve que enviar dos emails hoy https://t.co/7DT0pBbFLE

    77K5.7K32701.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20265.8x their median

    what’s the point of having boobs if nobody six seven them

    68K5.2K65691.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20265.7x their median

    New chick fil a billboard by my place just says “it’s giving chicken sandwich” sure man. Who gives a fuck anymore

    69K2.7K140741.4M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13K interactions against 931K followers, an engagement rate of 1.35%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 211K times each, and 5.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 344K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is bels 🧷's engagement rate on X?
bels 🧷 (@Noturhoneybb) has an engagement rate of 1.35%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 931,159 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.35%, bels 🧷 sits above the 75th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Noturhoneybb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Noturhoneybb post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going