Back to @NoelClarke's profile

Noel Clarke engagement report

@NoelClarke - 222K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.082%
of 222K followers
Per impression
0.279%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
29.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
182
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 222K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 0.279% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Noel Clarke's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.082%, Noel Clarke sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 202639x their median

    They did it again. https://t.co/YRXsQVhG47

    4.2K3582.4K1361.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202623x their median

    R.i.P - Baby cousin. 24/11/99 - 30/6/26 Love you. ❤️ https://t.co/MV3mWSjluC

    4.0K92620257K viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 202511x their median

    Unseen footage of Caroline Flack 💔 – utterly heartbreaking. The media hounded and destroyed her far worse than the murderers, rapists, and real criminals walking our streets. 😢 https://t.co/5UacYHSLbL

    1.7K14813413295K viewsView on X
  • Mar 3, 20264.5x their median

    KiDULTHOOD – HAPPY 20th BIRTHDAY: Kidulthood Released 20 years today: I would have loved to recreate the poster with everyone but of course we know that couldn’t happen. This film has bought so much positive to my life and more than a few negatives but today is a celebration. Big love to everyone involved in the making of the movie. We made something special, and birthed a genre. ORIGINS: Tonight, on Youtube at 8pm.

    72460028128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.9x their median

    “i heard that guy copied other people’s work” “I heard he said he ran races he didn’t run.” “And you know he doesn’t deserve his spot right?” “Lets tell everyone and Kill him” - if you believe its DEI gone to far or not. This was a human and it sounds stupid when it’s said as simply as this.

    205184751887K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.8x their median

    10 years for the highest grossing in the trilogy. Was told it would do nothing. They were wrong. Lots don’t quite appreciate the story, but the older you get the more you understand it and technically the best movie. 🤫 https://t.co/ICHe4N8G3c

    5682785478K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 2026

    On YouTube. March 3rd. The 20th Anniversary KiDULTHOOD ORIGINS: Part 1 https://t.co/tmkbNn0o28

    186240420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    September is my least favourite month. Closely followed by January and November. Do i need to explain why?

    6351182058K viewsView on X
  • Dec 25, 2025

    https://t.co/yGznL9jQku

    18640113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    How did you find Carnival today? https://t.co/Mgl14J06QU

    108345175K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 222K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 0.279% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

What is Noel Clarke's engagement rate on X?
Noel Clarke (@NoelClarke) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 222,051 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.082%, Noel Clarke sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoelClarke have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoelClarke post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going