Back to @Nocapmedia's profile

Wild content engagement report

@Nocapmedia - 2.1M followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 2.1M followers
Per impression
1.04%
99K views on a typical post
Reach
4.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.154%
154 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 194K interactions, about 187x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wild content's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, Wild content sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 2026187x their median

    Not all heroes wear capes. Some of them drive Camrys. https://t.co/nJP4wCi7py

    186K5.8K1.4K4649.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202666x their median

    Road rage incident as a man fights another driver for saying the N-word with a hard R. https://t.co/c6NhermqbB

    65K1.7K1.5K4362.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202627x their median

    WTF BE WRONG WITH PEOPLE? 🤢🤮 https://t.co/spVbVPTBs6

    22K1.7K2.1K2.4K17M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202625x their median

    Dude made it worse 😭 https://t.co/1eSffkzuyP

    23K1.9K6623011.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202621x their median

    I can’t believe this video is 100% real 😂 https://t.co/WkE7oijDKz

    20K1.2K380159800K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202615x their median

    WATCH: 2 firefighting helicopters collide midair in Greece https://t.co/15HP9DUMwa

    12K1.6K8393563.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202611x their median

    It's the skiddly daddle away for me https://t.co/Ew5jTRvJV9

    11K198282173.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20267.3x their median

    That men just won full custody and no child support. https://t.co/TQDtwVtF4T

    7.1K28716625748K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20266.7x their median

    Karen thinks she can walk out on a restaurant bill. Doing all this over a burger is wild. https://t.co/V6rvXCZ0AE

    6.1K51726617235K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20266.6x their median

    She's def the man in that relationship https://t.co/4T2xxlLUTk

    6.4K2141869190K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 194K interactions, about 187x its own typical post.

What is Wild content's engagement rate on X?
Wild content (@Nocapmedia) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,149,001 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, Wild content sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Nocapmedia have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Nocapmedia post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going