Back to @NoahsArk1000's profile

Noah’s Ark 🚢 engagement report

@NoahsArk1000 - 142K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.392%
of 142K followers
Per impression
9.38%
5.9K views on a typical post
Reach
4.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
555
interactions (median)
Saved
0.389%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 555 interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 0.392%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.9K times each, and 9.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Noah’s Ark 🚢's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.392%, Noah’s Ark 🚢 sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 209 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202655x their median

    Germany has given Israel over $94,000,000,000 ($94-$102b) in reparations. The US has given Israel over $317,900,000,000 ($317.9b) in foreign aid. What has Israel given to the world?

    25K3.9K1.8K320322K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202619x their median

    I think about this image a lot. 50 States. 1 Israel https://t.co/EmRRzXvuY8

    9.1K1.1K9931127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/o4rOQ2clPb

    9.2K32923131501K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202611x their median

    Why do atheists always attack Christianity and Islam but almost never Judaism?

    5.3K4313893989K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20269.7x their median

    I had to double take to be sure, but 👀 She just posted this. https://t.co/TeD6hELNoo

    4.5K20266343599K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.1x their median

    Tengu is an evil character from Japanese mythology. I’ve noticed something very specific about Tengu, do you see it? 👺 https://t.co/Ql9GNEwg01

    2.4K33566924K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.8x their median

    Louis Farrakhan on Reps and Dems. They can’t agree on anything except one country. Can you guess which one? https://t.co/wo3Hh1SEHj

    2.0K608384167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.6x their median

    Hey @Grok, How many new Flock Safety cameras are inside Hasidic Jewish communities in New York? Start with the number after checking sources and maps. https://t.co/eFTnRtAg8k

    1.5K418182941K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.0x their median

    She can’t show her hair so she buys a wig that looks like her real hair and wears that. What kind of loophole is that? https://t.co/3APMQhFzqw

    1.3K238992019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.7x their median

    Hey @Grok, which of these made multiple public peace offers, and who rejected them? List every offer with the date. https://t.co/HiVr1agkSQ

    876785420K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 555 interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 0.392%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.9K times each, and 9.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.

What is Noah’s Ark 🚢's engagement rate on X?
Noah’s Ark 🚢 (@NoahsArk1000) has an engagement rate of 0.392%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 142,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.392%, Noah’s Ark 🚢 sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoahsArk1000 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoahsArk1000 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going