Back to @NoaMagid's profile

נועה מגיד | Noa magid engagement report

@NoaMagid - 178K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.648%
of 178K followers
Per impression
10.1%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
6.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.177%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 0.648%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

נועה מגיד | Noa magid's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.648%, נועה מגיד | Noa magid sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 128 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 25, 202444x their median

    Even hell is not enough https://t.co/Ii63lZKYN2

    38K7.4K3.5K1.1K8.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202630x their median

    This is not a scene from a movie. This is October 7. This is 4-year-old Negev and his six-month-old brother, Eshel. The terrorists rocking Eshel in the stroller and holding Negev by the hand had just murdered their mother, Adi. Negev later said: "Bad people came into our house with drills and drilled through the whole house. They wanted to drill Eshel, but Mom wouldn’t let them. She told us to remember that she loved us more than anything in the world. And then she left." The terrorists placed grenades around Adi’s body and left her as bait inside one of the rooms. They tied another grenade to the door handle, so whoever came looking for her would be killed too. Then they filmed a propaganda video to show how "good" they were. They gave wounded Negev water and filmed him saying thank you in Arabic. They had just murdered his mother in front of him. Imagine that. Moments later, they took Negev and Eshel to a neighbor’s house. From there, the terrorists kidnapped all three and headed toward Gaza. On the way, Eshel cried nonstop. His crying bothered the terrorists, who thought he would become a problem later on, so they left all three by the side of the road and continued toward Gaza. They walked back to Kibbutz Holit and survived. The truth cannot be erased. Don't you dare forget.

    24K8.4K7805231.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202616x their median

    This is what murderous hatred looks like. They would have beaten her to death if mall security hadn't intervened. A Turkish-born Israeli tour guide was attacked by violent terror supporters in Turkey. https://t.co/V4BCdkWViU

    13K3.8K1.1K277336K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202613x their median

    I will never forget this image. Will you? https://t.co/95rYendKv7

    11K2.4K71511279K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.2x their median

    Our reality was a million times worse. October 7. https://t.co/4R0eNuMWZK

    7.9K1.2K20454174K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20268.1x their median

    God bless the IDF. https://t.co/anwUG6QLVs

    8.4K6531452385K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.8x their median

    We will never forget 7/10 https://t.co/ySwWe4O0Sy

    7.4K1.3K17829104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20267.4x their median

    Not NAZA. This is GAZA. On October 7, the world's most accurate documentary was made - and they filmed it themselves. No antisemite will rewrite the truth. Not even in Venice. https://t.co/dyT1K2KNa7

    6.2K2.0K195143193K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20267.2x their median

    Another angle of a lynch mob attack on an Israeli woman walking alone in a mall in Turkey. Monsters. https://t.co/pNuNavpifY

    6.3K1.4K45894142K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20266.7x their median

    Tel Aviv yesterday evening. This is what choosing life looks like. https://t.co/qJEKIwSkpW

    6.2K7746387384K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 0.648%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is נועה מגיד | Noa magid's engagement rate on X?
נועה מגיד | Noa magid (@NoaMagid) has an engagement rate of 0.648%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 177,997 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.648%, נועה מגיד | Noa magid sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoaMagid have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoaMagid post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going