Back to @NoToquenNada's profile

🤚🏻 NoToquenNada engagement report

@NoToquenNada - 368K followers on X

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 368K followers
Per impression
0.191%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.191% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.854% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152 interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

🤚🏻 NoToquenNada's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, 🤚🏻 NoToquenNada sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video37% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 37% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 202625x their median

    Balance del Partido Colorado no se puede auditar La Corte Electoral decidió ignorar la observación del Tribunal de Cuentas que observó al Partido Colorado por presentar un balance sin los estados contables. 📲 https://t.co/aXJQxAURao https://t.co/4WkXTHFpjw

    8555488.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202617x their median

    El Frente Amplio no escucha a sus expertos en Puertos Alberto Díaz, que estuvo al frente de la ANP durante los tres gobiernos frenteamplistas anteriores (de 2005 a 2020), dijo que los problemas “son los mismos” que antes y que las actuales autoridades no le han consultado. https://t.co/iSr060i6PN

    7027529.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202617x their median

    Gandini y la transparencia de una ley opaca sin controles Jorge Gandini sobre el financiamiento partidario, a partir de la conferencia de prensa en la que dijo que no recibió fondos de Pablo Leiva, asesor del edil Gonzalo Gómez de la lista 250. 📲 https://t.co/lQiXw9pGRL https://t.co/spH2F4VSGC

    6927308.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202615x their median

    No toquen nada supo que intermediarios en el cobro de las pólizas se llevan entre 30 y 35%. En 2025, solo en el Banco de Seguros del Estado, estos gestores, ganaron 4.500.000 dólares por trámites que los damnificados podrían haber hecho solos. https://t.co/bjX7nkbKTx

    6225238.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.2x their median

    Oddone habló del fin de los subsidios pero pocas horas antes Cardona afirmó que se subsidia con 75 millones de dólares a los combustibles, el doble del aumento de recursos para la infancia de la Rendición de Cuentas. Columna de Seba Fleitas. https://t.co/hOC0esfcDy

    263115.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.7x their median

    Los gestores hacen el 95% de los reclamos por siniestro y cobran por un "trámite sencillo" on line, que puede hacer cualquiera Entrevista con Emiliano Chechile, gerente del Área de Operaciones del Banco de Seguros del Estado. 📲 https://t.co/TdyLjYomij https://t.co/iuwpohjvqp

    215205.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.7x their median

    El Departamento de Periodismo de Opinión recordó dichos de Jorge Gandini sobre el financiamiento partidario, a partir de la conferencia en la que dijo que no recibió fondos de Pablo Leiva, asesor de su edil Gonzalo Gomez, condenado por lavado de activos. https://t.co/vtx9mNfqNI

    174106.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.5x their median

    Líderes políticos, no se entiende el tema de la reunión ni el fracaso de la cita 📲 https://t.co/eQGFHwy5sC https://t.co/jxTYFnvM7m

    183006.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.3x their median

    100 millones de subsidio al agro y un debate ausente Comentario de Ricardo @sweleiva sobre los nuevos precios de los combustibles anunciados por el gobierno y dónde se ubicaría la renuncia fiscal para sostener esta política. 📲 https://t.co/4cGBy7ublw https://t.co/eeoj1lVAFm

    124405.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.0x their median

    La música siempre fue lo primero en su vida y hace 40 años que está en ella. Tras la muerte de su hijo, Jorge Nasser decidió convertir lo que iba a ser un concierto aniversario en un motivo para seguir adelante, con la música y el público como alicientes. https://t.co/5BoaewmsnH

    143106.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.191% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.854% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152 interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is 🤚🏻 NoToquenNada's engagement rate on X?
🤚🏻 NoToquenNada (@NoToquenNada) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 73 original posts from the last 30 days against 368,194 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, 🤚🏻 NoToquenNada sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoToquenNada have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoToquenNada post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going