Back to @NoLimitGains's profile

NoLimit engagement report

@NoLimitGains - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 172 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.068%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.429%
239K views on a typical post
Reach
15.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
79 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.5/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 172 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 239K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 172 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 175x its own typical post.

Measured over 172 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NoLimit's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.068%, NoLimit sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 30, 2019175x their median

    Ethereum

    102K12K5.5K3.1KView on X
  • Oct 8, 202664x their median

    I know people are worried about fuel prices. And I get it. You get to the pump, watch the numbers climb, and wonder why it's costing so much more than it used to.   The reality is that global events are pushing up costs, and families here at home are feeling the impact.   But I won't accept that there's nothing I can do to help.   That's why from today, you'll be able to see petrol and diesel prices on Google Maps, compare nearby stations and find the cheapest option before you fill up.   It's a small change, but if there's a practical way to help people keep more money in their pocket, I'll do it.

    22K1.3K35K7.7K12M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202628x their median

    If you put $10,000 in the S&P in 1921 you’d have roughly $536 million today. You’d also be dead.

    27K73128252795K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202623x their median

    $1,000 to one random person who likes & replies. Must be following. Winner in 24hrs.

    13K2.5K8.0K34714K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202616x their median

    BREAKING: If Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX hadn't gone bankrupt, its portfolio would be worth approximately $206 billion today. That includes a 1,500,000% gain on Cursor and 34,000% on Anthropic, making him one of the best investors of the decade.

    15K427297821.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202614x their median

    Google searches for “can’t sell house” just hit an all-time high. Above 2008. “Help with mortgage” is back at 2009 levels. Sellers can’t sell and owners can’t pay. https://t.co/h4u1vo9Rck

    13K1.2K2942001.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202614x their median

    I'll send $1,000 to one random person who likes this post. Must be following so I can DM you. Winner in 24hrs.

    12K7491.4K8364K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202611x their median

    We're in the middle of a global bond crisis and almost nobody outside of finance has any clue it's happening. Nice.

    10K62922651567K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202610x their median

    If the Top 1% of Americans disappeared tomorrow, the 99% would face a catastrophe. If the Bottom 1% of Americans disappeared tomorrow, the 99% would see an immediate improvement in their day-to-day quality of life and our country would be in a fundamentally better position.

    9.6K75833175430K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20269.7x their median

    Somebody PLEASE explain how people are affording $100K trucks, $60K boats, $30K side-by-sides, and $1.2 MILLION houses on 20 acres… With 3 kids, 2 dogs, a cat, groceries, insurance, and a family to support. Meanwhile, the rest of us are doing math at the gas station before filling up our cars. WHAT DO THESE PEOPLE DO FOR A LIVING? 😭 Because at this point, I’m convinced somebody’s money laundering through a tractor dealership.

    7.7K3331.9K1281.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 172 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 239K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 172 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 175x its own typical post.

What is NoLimit's engagement rate on X?
NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) has an engagement rate of 0.068%, based on the median interactions across 172 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,505,703 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.068%, NoLimit sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoLimitGains have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoLimitGains post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going