Back to @NoLimitGains's profile

NoLimit engagement report

@NoLimitGains - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 131 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.348%
216K views on a typical post
Reach
14.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
752
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
77 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.9/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 752 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 131 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 216K times each, and 0.348% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 131 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

Measured over 131 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NoLimit's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, NoLimit sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202638x their median

    If you put $10,000 in the S&P in 1921 you’d have roughly $536 million today. You’d also be dead.

    27K73128252795K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    Private equity has been quietly buying every boring business in your town and almost nobody has noticed. Dentists, vets, car washes, HVAC companies, funeral homes. All of it. The logic is simple. These are businesses people can't stop using. Your dog gets sick whether the economy is good or not. Your air conditioning breaks in July regardless of what the Fed does. So a fund buys 40 independent vet clinics in a state, keeps the names on the buildings so nobody notices, and now they set the prices for the whole region. That's why your vet bill doubled and the receptionist can't explain why. She doesn't know either. The pricing comes from somewhere she's never been. I don't think most people realise how much of their monthly spending now goes to about a dozen funds.

    7.6K1.4K30598428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.7x their median

    Moderna is up 142% today after its cancer vaccine trial with Merck hit its endpoints. Guess who bought it in March? Donald Trump. https://t.co/i26KqjLXAm

    6.1K25315231607K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20268.5x their median

    BREAKING: Jim Cramer says he has sold all of his remaining Bitcoin.

    5.3K2287052011.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.5x their median

    New York City is the wealthiest city in the world, with an estimated 1 out of every 22 residents being a millionaire. https://t.co/bdmKpWXm5Y

    5.4K1346930331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.0x their median

    Financial advisors who aren’t millionaires telling millionaires what to do with their money will never stop being funny.

    3.4K13118229271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.9x their median

    Canada is the only G7 country that owns ZERO gold. They finished selling in early 2016 and kept 77 ounces of coins, which is about $400,000 worth. The final sale was 95,817 ounces at an average of $1,274.70, for around $122 million. At today’s prices that’s roughly $495 million. So that batch alone cost them about $374 million. But that’s not the real number… In 1965 Canada held 1,023 tonnes. That’s 32.9 million ounces. They spent the next 50 years selling it off. At today’s price that hoard would be worth roughly $170 billion. Canada’s entire foreign currency reserves are about $126 billion. The gold they sold would be worth more than everything they currently hold. The reason given was diversification. Move away from physical commodities into liquid financial assets. The best part is that Canada is the fourth largest gold producer on earth. They mined 200 tonnes last year, worth about $15 billion. They dig it out of the ground, sell it to other central banks, and hold none of it.

    3.2K23117125479K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.9x their median

    Canada are you ok??? No developed economy is printing as much as Canada is. https://t.co/q5fqIbJCCz

    3.1K28423953455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.8x their median

    JPMorgan is forecasting global food inflation to go from 2.8% now to 5% by early 2027. The driver is fertilizer. 1/3 of the world’s nitrogen fertilizer moves through the Strait of Hormuz, and that strait has been shut since February. Nitrogen goes into about half of all crops grown globally. And unlike oil, there’s no strategic reserve for fertilizer. Nothing to release. NOAA also has a historic El Niño at 69% probability for October to December. Those events have historically cut tropical crop output by 3.5%. US grocery prices are already up 33% since 2019. Not empty shelves. Just expensive food, and it hits the harvest after next rather than this one.

    2.9K49912060357K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.5x their median

    I find it funny that people still call Bitcoin a scam when the cash they use every day is slowly going to zero against it.

    3.1K16817316238K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 752 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 131 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 216K times each, and 0.348% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 131 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

What is NoLimit's engagement rate on X?
NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 131 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,514,767 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, NoLimit sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoLimitGains have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoLimitGains post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going