NoLimit engagement report
@NoLimitGains - 1.5M followers on X
Measured over 172 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 172 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 239K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 172 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 175x its own typical post.
Measured over 172 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
NoLimit's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.068%, NoLimit sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 46% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 12% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 30, 2019175x their median
Ethereum
- Oct 8, 202664x their median
I know people are worried about fuel prices. And I get it. You get to the pump, watch the numbers climb, and wonder why it's costing so much more than it used to. The reality is that global events are pushing up costs, and families here at home are feeling the impact. But I won't accept that there's nothing I can do to help. That's why from today, you'll be able to see petrol and diesel prices on Google Maps, compare nearby stations and find the cheapest option before you fill up. It's a small change, but if there's a practical way to help people keep more money in their pocket, I'll do it.
- Aug 25, 202628x their median
If you put $10,000 in the S&P in 1921 you’d have roughly $536 million today. You’d also be dead.
- Oct 4, 202623x their median
$1,000 to one random person who likes & replies. Must be following. Winner in 24hrs.
- Sep 27, 202616x their median
BREAKING: If Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX hadn't gone bankrupt, its portfolio would be worth approximately $206 billion today. That includes a 1,500,000% gain on Cursor and 34,000% on Anthropic, making him one of the best investors of the decade.
- Sep 6, 202614x their median
Google searches for “can’t sell house” just hit an all-time high. Above 2008. “Help with mortgage” is back at 2009 levels. Sellers can’t sell and owners can’t pay. https://t.co/h4u1vo9Rck
- Oct 5, 202614x their median
I'll send $1,000 to one random person who likes this post. Must be following so I can DM you. Winner in 24hrs.
- Sep 26, 202611x their median
We're in the middle of a global bond crisis and almost nobody outside of finance has any clue it's happening. Nice.
- Oct 16, 202610x their median
If the Top 1% of Americans disappeared tomorrow, the 99% would face a catastrophe. If the Bottom 1% of Americans disappeared tomorrow, the 99% would see an immediate improvement in their day-to-day quality of life and our country would be in a fundamentally better position.
- Oct 15, 20269.7x their median
Somebody PLEASE explain how people are affording $100K trucks, $60K boats, $30K side-by-sides, and $1.2 MILLION houses on 20 acres… With 3 kids, 2 dogs, a cat, groceries, insurance, and a family to support. Meanwhile, the rest of us are doing math at the gas station before filling up our cars. WHAT DO THESE PEOPLE DO FOR A LIVING? 😭 Because at this point, I’m convinced somebody’s money laundering through a tractor dealership.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 172 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 239K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 172 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 175x its own typical post.
- What is NoLimit's engagement rate on X?
- NoLimit (@NoLimitGains) has an engagement rate of 0.068%, based on the median interactions across 172 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,505,703 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.068%, NoLimit sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NoLimitGains have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NoLimitGains post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.5 posts per day across the measured window.