Nik engagement report
@Nikitadigital10 - 428K followers on X
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 5.9K times each, and 0.625% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 528x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Nik sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Dec 11, 2025528x their median
You can now design directly in your codebase. Select elements, modify them visually, and Cursor writes the code. https://t.co/lF3fw8uTAh
- Dec 31, 2025244x their median
The future of retail gambling onchain is with tap trading. This is like TikTok for trading. https://t.co/uKolrl5jhc
- Dec 19, 2025219x their median
Experimenting with liquid metal. https://t.co/SmffQeUbP3
- Dec 16, 202574x their median
NEAR seems to me a top 2-3 underrated team in crypto it's the only technical team as talented as Solana with the results to show for it, v smart devs it is also still founder-led with Illia (the guy who helped invent LLMs) if their GTM gets fixed, no reason why it's not top 10
- Dec 10, 202569x their median
Imagine buying 1 million Bitcoin in 2009 https://t.co/mXxKZZrAEk
- Mar 17, 202634x their median
HOT Labs announces the appointment of @donamarahp as Chief Executive Officer Yurii is a co-founder of HOT Labs, Head of Ecosystem, and the key figure behind the development of our community, ecosystem, and strategic partnerships since the day one. Starting today, Yurii is leading HOT Labs as CEO. In his new role, he will focus on developing the company’s next phases, including launching new initiatives such as new AI direction, HOT Pay and HOT Exchange. Yurii's experience, vision, and deep understanding of the marker will be able to strengthen HOT Labs’ strategic focus and lead the company into its next phase of growth. Please join us in congratulating Yurii on his new role 🎉
- Dec 31, 202534x their median
🔥 HOT Ecosystem: 2025 Year in Review – All the Big Releases in One Post 🗓️ https://t.co/H84V467Vl8
- Jan 21, 202612x their median
I know many of you are waiting for 2FA. Same. It’s taking longer than we hoped, so I want to explain why it’s not “just another roadmap item”. Quick thing first, because I keep seeing confusion chatting with our users: HOT Wallet has two account types. If you created your wallet early on, you most likely have an MPC account. A non-MPC account is just a classic self-custody wallet. Here’s the difference in simple words: - With a non-MPC wallet, one secret controls everything. If someone gets it, game over. - With MPC, there isn’t a single secret sitting somewhere. The key is split. Part lives on your device, part lives inside HOT Protocol’s MPC infrastructure. You still control the wallet, but it’s much harder to compromise with one lucky mistake. One important detail: our MPC is not “centralized custody”. The nodes are independent, the protocol is built on top of NEAR One MPC, and it’s been audited by Trail of Bits. And that’s exactly why 2FA matters. 2FA on top of MPC means: even if you get tricked by a scam dApp, or someone gains access to your device, there’s an extra verification step before anything irreversible happens. Think Authenticator or email confirmations, depending on what you choose. It’s not a “nice to have”. It’s the difference between “I clicked once and got drained” and “I got a chance to stop it”. We’ve already seen real support cases where users had malware on their PC, but their HOT funds stayed safe because many drainers are built around the traditional single-key wallet model. They don’t expect MPC. Now, the tradeoff. MPC accounts currently live inside HOT Wallet and the HOT Protocol ecosystem. That means you can’t always export them into random third-party apps until they support this account type too. So no, 2FA isn’t just another step toward some date on a roadmap. It’s the feature that makes HOT Wallet feel like a primary wallet, not a “use at your own risk” wallet.
- Jan 15, 20267.4x their median
⚡️ App store update Updated the wallet page. What's new? - Now a nice grid with new images - Localization of texts by region - Optimized description for promotion inside the app store Come leave feedback if you haven't done so yet. https://t.co/tY5gOT12LY
- Jan 29, 20267.3x their median
Have you seen this update already? https://t.co/1xEPr5pQO3
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 5.9K times each, and 0.625% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 528x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Nik's engagement rate on X?
- Nik (@Nikitadigital10) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 427,650 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Nik sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Nikitadigital10 have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @Nikitadigital10 post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.