Nikita Odintsov engagement report
@NikitaOdintsov - 342K followers on X
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 342K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 1746x its own typical post.
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nikita Odintsov's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.006%, Nikita Odintsov sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 43% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 717 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 20261746x their median
¡El wokismo finalmente está muriendo en 2026! ¡No más modelos obesas y trans, empresas como Calvin Klein han vuelto a la Normalidad! ¡Gracias Sydney Sweeney!❤️ RT @Sumeriannwarior https://t.co/XYcRyB3TBB
- Oct 7, 2026546x their median
Happy 74th Birthday to President Vladimir Putin! 🇷🇺 https://t.co/eaeSs2lp7k
- Aug 21, 2026518x their median
Dear @elonmusk please, PLEASE for the love of what ever you hold holy to you, disable politicians from being able to turn their comments off or enabling only accounts they allow to comment. We NEED to hold these people to account before things really turn violent.
- Aug 13, 2026355x their median
BREAKING: 𝕏 is rolling out a new “Under the Hood” page that shows whether your account or posts have labels that may limit their reach. You can see what each label means, how it affects visibility, and download a monthly report. Check yours: https://t.co/jTRvDNwEeG https://t.co/w6mF1I3js2
- Sep 12, 2026340x their median
Dario Amodei: we must slow down Sam Altman: we agree Elon Musk: Dario is right All of this looks fishy. What is cooking up ? 🧐
- Apr 11, 2026582x their median
Привет твиттеряне, пишу из Москвы на московском языке. На каком языке это твит видеть вы?
- Aug 20, 2026117x their median
Life Advice #1 : Never take Annual sub for any platform. https://t.co/wg2DyaKwdu
- Aug 22, 202630x their median
Сегодня невольно услышал разговор трёх взрослых женщин в кафе. Обсуждали, как найти «нормального мужчину». Среди критериев прозвучало: «Он должен искать не маму, а партнёра». И вот тут я поймал себя на мысли, что мужчины вообще редко мыслят такими категориями. Нам не нужны «партнёрские модели», терминология из психологических подкастов и уж точно не хочется жить внутри отношений как внутри бесконечного проекта с KPI и регламентами. Большинство нормальных мужчин, как мне кажется, ждут гораздо более простых вещей. Не выносить мозг по мелочам. Не обесценивать то, что мужчина делает. Не превращать каждую бытовую сложность в экзамен на «правильность». И главное - искренне ценить заботу, усилия, ответственность и поступки. Потому что мужчина обычно очень хорошо чувствует, когда его действительно ценят. И очень быстро понимает, когда им просто пользуются, воспитывают или бесконечно проверяют на соответствие чьим-то представлениям. Мне кажется, в отношениях вообще слишком много стало терминов и слишком мало простых человеческих вещей. Уважение. Тепло. Благодарность. Спокойствие рядом. Наверное, именно это мужчины и ищут гораздо чаще, чем очередную «модель партнёрства».
- Oct 6, 202627x their median
これ都市伝説なんですけど、海外のハッカーグループは必死で計算資源を買い集めてるんですよね。Abliteratedモデルでサイバー攻撃すれば簡単に稼げてしまう。 最近情報漏洩のニュースが急増しているのはハッカーが爆買いした計算資源 × オープンウエイトモデルの影響です。 詳しい人なら知ってると思いますが、ガードレールを壊したりしてサイバー攻撃をやらせることは簡単にできちゃうんです。 今後サイバー攻撃はもっと増えていくと思いますし、ローカルLLMのエンタープライズ需要も急激に伸びていくと思います。 我々もホワイトハッカー勢力として、ローカルLLMを活用した防衛力強化にコミットしていく必要があるかもしれません。 そのためには、企業に対して、Abliteratedモデルの有用性の部分も正しくプレゼンして、伝えていけないのかもしれません。 攻撃力と防衛力は実はコインの裏表です。脆弱性を見つけてそれをどうするかという話。 攻撃で使われているモデルは、防御にもめっちゃくちゃ有効です。
- Sep 30, 202623x their median
X ALGORITHM UPDATE 🚨 X just changed their open source algo scores for the first time in 6 releases (I check it daily with Claude and share worthy updates with you) tl;dr: tapping into your post: 0.4 → 0.3 score staying 10+ seconds after the tap: 0 → 0.4 score lesson learned: create content worth staying on for at least 10 seconds, better than tap & leave posts. full details: - The tap is worth less, the read is worth more Someone tapping into your post used to score 0.4. Now it's 0.3. But there's a brand new score: that person staying on it for more than 10 seconds after the tap. That's worth 0.4, and it used to be 0. So a tap followed by a proper read is now worth 0.7 instead of 0.4. A tap where they bail straight away is worth less than before. Clickbait just got weaker. Posts that deliver got stronger. - "Not interested" now hurts 10% more Went from -43.2 to -47.52. The more likely someone is to hide your post, the more it costs you. - Good news! The fresh posts pool got closer X has defined a pool for new posts that haven't taken off yet: under 8 likes, under 500 views, up to 2 hours old. This week X removed the rule that would have scored those posts 0 for most people. It's still switched off, but that's the fourth step in ten days. When it goes live, I'll tell you. - Insults now hide your post from non-followers everywhere Before, an insult label only kept the post out of recommendations. Now non-followers don't see it anywhere it shows up. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - write posts that hold people for 10+ seconds once they tap in, that's a new 0.4 - give people a reason to stay once they open it, the tap alone dropped to 0.3 - check your Under the Hood report, legal takedowns by country show up in it - make your videos worth tapping, the tap scores and the watch still scores 0 - copy link share, still the biggest number in the whole system at 20 - post originals, they're the only thing that reaches people who don't follow you - follow back the people who talk to you, replies between mutuals go from 5 to 20 - posts people want to reply to or quote, both worth 5 - posts worth sending to one person, a DM share is 5 - early likes still open the doors to strangers, 1 and 32 are the two numbers - one good post beats six, your second one in the same feed only counts for 62% - under 1,000 followers there's a free lift to around 16th in someone's feed - native video over 10 seconds, still the line for the video lists - a post that wins you a follower is worth 4 - check your pinned post, a bad link in there labels your whole account for a week What you should NOT be doing: - don't write clickbait people tap and leave, that's worth less now - don't post things your audience wants to hide, "not interested" is now -47.52 - don't insult people, that label now hides the post from non-followers everywhere - don't post adult images or video if reach matters, 3 flagged in your last 5 labels the account - don't hide anything in a video, checks start at 64 likes and go deeper at 512 - don't quote a video you haven't watched all the way through - don't chain-reply to yourself under big accounts - don't pick up an account label, that's what cuts off non-followers completely - don't pin a post that links to a site X rates badly - don't rely on replies and reposts for reach - don't post the same text over and over - don't tag strangers in a post that also has a low quality link - don't go near engagement bait, it's the one category where big accounts get no pass - don't post several times back to back - don't stuff hashtags - don't count on bookmarks, they still score nothing - don't expect anything from a post after 48 hours
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 342K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 1746x its own typical post.
- What is Nikita Odintsov's engagement rate on X?
- Nikita Odintsov (@NikitaOdintsov) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 341,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.006%, Nikita Odintsov sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NikitaOdintsov have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NikitaOdintsov post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.