Nicholas Veniamin engagement report
@NickVeniamin - 181K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 24,308 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 562x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nicholas Veniamin's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,308 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Nicholas Veniamin sits above the 10th percentile of the 243,913 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.027%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.027% |
| 50th percentile | 0.158% |
| 75th percentile | 0.744% |
| 90th percentile | 2.77% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 01:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 02:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 03:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 04:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 05:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 06:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 07:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 08:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 09:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 10:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 11:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 12:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 13:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 14:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 15:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 16:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 17:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 18:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 19:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 20:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 21:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 22:00 UTC | not measured | - |
| 23:00 UTC | not measured | - |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | not measured | - |
| Monday | not measured | - |
| Tuesday | not measured | - |
| Wednesday | not measured | - |
| Thursday | not measured | - |
| Friday | not measured | - |
| Saturday | not measured | - |
Best tweets
- Nov 28, 2023562x their median
Best President of the 21st century! Thank you for draining the swamp in advance. @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/o01aoPz7LK
- Sep 12, 2026185x their median
WHISTLEBLOWERS GO MISSING OVERNIGHT Victoria Rixon @Victoria_Rixon gave the NHS @NHS 6.5 years as a midwife. Six and a half years of labour wards run on 2 staff instead of the number that keeps people alive. She watched colleagues do 12.5 hour shifts with no food, no water, no toilet break, each one responsible for up to 20 patients at once. She watched a woman labour alone for 10 hours behind a curtain with zero care. The baby needed emergency resuscitation. So she reported it. That is literally what NHS induction tells every new starter to do. Turns out that part of the training was more of a suggestion. What came back was the full institutional playbook. She was falsely accused of being responsible for a baby's death. Her employer sent her a cease and desist letter after her exit interview, presumably to make sure she left quietly and rattled. And a member of NHS management gave her a friendly heads up on the way out: ... "Whistleblowers go missing overnight" An actual NHS manager said that. Out loud. To a midwife who raised a patient safety concern. Somewhere there is a training manual that badly needs a rewrite. On 9 April 2024, Victoria handed back her Nursing and Midwifery Council @nmcnews registration and walked away from the career she trained 4 years for and loved every day of. She has not gone quiet since. She has spent the time building her own campaign, the With Woman Movement, touring the country talking to midwives and mothers about exactly what she saw on those wards. She says she is still being harassed for it. The NMC @nmcnews, NHS England @NHSEngland, and the Royal College of Midwives @MidwivesRCM have had inquiry after inquiry, report after report. The wards are still dangerously short staffed. The system does not need another review. It needs someone to actually read the last dozen.
- Sep 1, 202613x their median
🔴Signs That We’re Close To A Global Currency Reset https://t.co/ZQ3sbCy1ig
- Sep 6, 20267.9x their median
Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 state that those who say they are Jews and are not, but lie, form a synagogue of Satan. “Chosen people”, my ass!
- Sep 7, 20267.3x their median
🔴Signs That We’re Close To A Global Currency Reset https://t.co/ZQ3sbCy1ig
- Sep 26, 20267.1x their median
🔴Did The White House Just Hint For An Emergency Broadcast To Tell The World Something Serious? https://t.co/Ej6Ip3Z3us
- Sep 17, 20266.6x their median
I’m calling all the Zionist “Jews”, the real Jews and Israelis to watch this video of Netanyahu confessing his crimes. https://t.co/9WfMkXh7jV
- Sep 4, 20265.9x their median
🔴Signs That We’re Close To A Global Currency Reset https://t.co/ZQ3sbCy1ig
- Sep 27, 20265.1x their median
Imagine if becoming Prime Minister, President, or holding public office required more than votes, money, influence and connections. Imagine if every candidate had to pass a test of character — measuring empathy, integrity, compassion, emotional intelligence and genuine intention to serve others. Not an IQ test. A humanity test. Perhaps the people entrusted with the most power should first have to prove they possess the qualities required to use that power responsibly. Maybe the real qualification for leadership shouldn’t just be what you know or who you know… It should be who you are when nobody is watching.
- Sep 9, 20265.0x their median
🔴Iraqi Dinar Revaluation: The Evidence No One Is Talking About https://t.co/kV5t5ewDNo
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 24,308 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 562x its own typical post.
- What is Nicholas Veniamin's engagement rate on X?
- Nicholas Veniamin (@NickVeniamin) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 180,807 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Nicholas Veniamin sits above the 10th percentile of the 243,913 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NickVeniamin have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,308 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NickVeniamin post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.