Back to @NickJFuentes's profile

Nicholas J. Fuentes engagement report

@NickJFuentes - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.401%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
3.25%
160K views on a typical post
Reach
12.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
87 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.401%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 160K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nicholas J. Fuentes's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.401%, Nicholas J. Fuentes sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 202620x their median

    If Trump deports Sneako and Hasan Piker I will vote straight Republican in the midterms.

    82K4.0K1.9K2682.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202619x their median

    Muslims cry about Western colonialism and genocide, then scream that Islam will dominate the world and gloat about White Genocide in the next sentence. They deserve ZERO sympathy. I’m done.

    73K5.6K2.2K3301.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202615x their median

    Jane Doe, the Cornell Slut, should be imprisoned for falsely accusing the 7 of rape.

    73K4.3K1.2K4434.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202614x their median

    https://t.co/55u5sfisI9

    68K3.6K2.1K5344.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202612x their median

    Trump promised “no new wars,” then started a war with Iran that we are not only losing but which also destroyed the economy. Meanwhile, his corrupt advisors are selling their access to him for millions of dollars to megadonors and foreign countries. Stay home or vote Democrat.

    57K4.2K3.3K5712.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202612x their median

    The UAE confirmed what we’ve already known for almost 3 years, which is that Netanyahu sat on detailed intelligence warning of the October 7th attack, probably because he wanted it to happen. October 7th was the manufactured pretext for a regional war to build Greater Israel.

    56K5.4K8801691.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202611x their median

    Twitter is doing to “rape culture” what body cameras did to “police brutality.”

    55K2.9K437771.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202611x their median

    Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children to death & Candace Owens says she is “obviously not guilty” because big pharma made her do it. Now women are lining the streets to cheer for the murderer as she arrives in court after they raised $1,000,000 for her. This is pure evil.

    53K3.8K1.3K147994K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202613x their median

    Allah could not save Egypt from Messi. CONQUERED BY WHITE EXCELLENCE… AGAIN

    53K2.7K2.3K3522.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202618x their median

    Trump feels totally irrelevant now. Nobody cared about his speech on the Fourth of July for America 250 and nobody cared about his “primetime address” on Thursday about voter fraud. He blew it and now he’s already a lame duck.

    50K3.2K1.6K1891.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.401%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 160K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is Nicholas J. Fuentes's engagement rate on X?
Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) has an engagement rate of 0.401%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,299,817 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.401%, Nicholas J. Fuentes sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NickJFuentes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NickJFuentes post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going