Back to @NickFoles's profile

Nick Foles engagement report

@NickFoles - 344K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 344K followers
Per impression
0.238%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
5.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
48
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 344K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.238% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 372x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nick Foles's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Nick Foles sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,335 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,335 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,892 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link82% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 82% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 103 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 2026372x their median

    Wow. Wow. Wow. Unbelievable drive by Jalen Hurts and the Eagles. Impressive.

    16K1.4K7424183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202658x their median

    How do you order your cheesesteaks? I want all the details.

    2.1K71481185405K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202642x their median

    A lot from this Eagles-Rams to discuss. Brutal loss for the Eagles. Do not like those 4th down decisions for reasons I will share on THE SZN. And a lot more... Good win for the Rams on the road in the Linc.

    1.9K5356863K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202619x their median

    I am ordering a couple of Philly cheesesteaks to watch the second half of this Eagles game; it is going to be epic. A full reaction show is coming up right after the game on THE SZN. There are so many great things to talk about from this first half. I can't wait for the second half.

    765251031092K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.8x their median

    Evan and I discuss the Eagles' latest victory and break down what happened on the two interceptions and the game-winning touchdown pass; there is a lot more going on with the game-winning touchdown pass than meets the eye. This is why you have to love football for plays like this. https://t.co/5fSniTIr2M

    299206022K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20266.7x their median

    It is time for the Eagles defense to get one more turnover to get closer to finishing out this game vs the Rams. I have a lot of thoughts on the Eagles offense. Finish.

    288822220K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.7x their median

    It was an absolute honor to have my former teammate Brandon Graham on the show; here is the link to check it out. https://t.co/Ao0IVKw7al

    119110119K viewsView on X
  • Feb 3, 20266.8x their median

    https://t.co/PZEMF66Wad

    105143150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.5x their median

    There is a lot of news in the NFL; Zach Ertz is back with the Philadelphia Eagles, there have been unfortunate injuries throughout the league, and there is much to look forward to in Week 3 of the NFL season. https://t.co/s6BrrR53CH

    11271025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.4x their median

    Evan and I give our thoughts right after the Bears dismantled the Eagles in their Week 3 matchup on Monday Night Football. https://t.co/1yEZsocFaN

    93145235K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 344K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.238% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 372x its own typical post.

What is Nick Foles's engagement rate on X?
Nick Foles (@NickFoles) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 343,581 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Nick Foles sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,335 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NickFoles have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NickFoles post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going