Back to @NgocMy18x's profile

B7🔶 LUCKツ engagement report

@NgocMy18x - 150K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 150K followers
Per impression
1.15%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.931% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 535x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #apple, #binance.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #apple, #binance.

Compared with accounts its own size

B7🔶 LUCKツ's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, B7🔶 LUCKツ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 786 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2026535x their median

    this used to be a draft believe it or not

    7.4K4096871091.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.8x their median

    🤓HOW TO BUY ethereum:0x32b77729cd87f1ef2bea4c650c16f89f08472c69 ON DeBox https://t.co/wyHob3fRdH

    54102448.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.9x their median

    😂😂😂😂😅😅😅🎼 https://t.co/ib8HOHL3v6

    3231114.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.8x their median

    In recent weeks, the global landscape has seen a notable rise in conflicts, with various regions experiencing heightened tensions. For instance, ongoing disputes in Eastern Europe and the Middle East have raised concerns among international observers. Experts are urging for diplomatic solutions to prevent escalation and promote peace. The economic implications of these conflicts are significant, affecting markets and global stability. As nations navigate these complex situations, the call for collaboration and dialogue has never been more critical. It's essential to stay informed and engaged as these events unfold, ensuring that we contribute to a more peaceful world.

    2931302.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.7x their median

    có ai đã từng kiếm tiền trên okx orbit chưa ?! https://t.co/b47KeqWTnn

    2541404.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.6x their median

    The recent announcement from the European Union about plans to regulate AI technologies is stirring discussions across various sectors. As AI continues to evolve, the EU aims to introduce a framework that prioritizes safety, transparency, and accountability. This initiative is crucial, especially given the rapid advancements and the potential risks associated with AI deployment in everyday life. What makes this noteworthy is the EU's proactive approach. While some regions are still grappling with the implications of AI, the EU is setting a precedent that could influence global standards. This regulation could impact everything from data privacy to ethical AI development. For creators and builders in the Web3 space, this could signal a shift in how we think about integrating AI with decentralized technologies. It raises questions about compliance, innovation, and the balance between regulation and creativity. How do you see these regulations shaping the future of AI in your projects?

    248811.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.9x their median

    😅😂😂😂 https://t.co/EdTehgWqAS

    1731103.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.9x their median

    As global tensions rise, the U.S. is ramping up its focus on AI technology, particularly in defense applications. Recent reports indicate that the Pentagon is investing heavily in AI to enhance military capabilities, predicting a significant shift in how warfare is conducted. This is noteworthy because the integration of AI not only enhances operational efficiency but also raises ethical questions about autonomous systems and decision-making in conflict scenarios. From a broader perspective, as nations race to dominate AI technology, the implications extend beyond military applications; they could redefine economic power dynamics and geopolitical strategies. For builders and innovators in the Web3 space, this presents both challenges and opportunities. How can we ensure that emerging technologies promote peace and collaboration rather than conflict? Your thoughts?

    224401.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.8x their median

    Doggo 🐶🐶 https://t.co/DbMmM5cENU

    163904.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.7x their median

    A significant shift is underway in the tech landscape as AI continues to redefine industries globally. Recently, reports highlighted how companies are now leveraging AI not just for efficiency but also for creativity. This transition is noteworthy because it signifies a broader acceptance of AI as a tool for innovation, rather than just automation. For instance, businesses in creative sectors are using AI to generate content, design products, and even assist in strategic decision-making. From my perspective, this evolution poses both opportunities and challenges. While AI can enhance creativity, it also raises questions about authorship and originality. As builders and creators in the Web3 space, we must consider how to integrate AI responsibly, ensuring it complements human creativity rather than replacing it. What are your thoughts on the balance between AI assistance and human innovation?

    187202.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#apple#binance

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.931% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 535x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #apple, #binance.

What is B7🔶 LUCKツ's engagement rate on X?
B7🔶 LUCKツ (@NgocMy18x) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 149,920 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, B7🔶 LUCKツ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NgocMy18x have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NgocMy18x post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going