NeurIPS Conference engagement report
@NeurIPSConf - 167K followers on X
Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 167K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.443% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 970 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.051%, NeurIPS Conference sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 71% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 27, 202614x their median
We want to speak directly to the concern many of you have expressed, and we owe you a clear explanation of what happened, why it happened, and where we stand now. We understand this situation caused genuine alarm and we take that seriously. In preparing the NeurIPS 2026 handbook, we included a link to a US government sanctions tool that covers a significantly broader set of restrictions than those NeurIPS is actually required to follow. This error was due to miscommunication between the NeurIPS Foundation and our legal team; there was never an intention to restrict participation beyond our mandatory compliance obligations. The responsibility for that error is ours as an organization, and we deeply apologize for the alarm and impact this miscommunication had on our community. We have updated the link and clarified the text of our policy, which is consistent with that of ACM and IEEE, as well as other international conferences and NeurIPS in the past. As in previous years, NeurIPS welcomes submissions from all compliant institutions and individuals. We want to reiterate that NeurIPS is a community-driven event, created by and for the community, and strives to be inclusive. The NeurIPS 2026 organizing committee was particularly saddened to learn of this institutional miscommunication. The organizing committee has taken on the responsibility of running the conference this year with the goal of fostering open communication, knowledge sharing, and global scientific discourse. We thank the community for bringing this issue to our attention and working with us through this situation.
- Mar 23, 20268.5x their median
Following the success of the EurIPS and NeurIPS-Mexico City pilots in 2025, we are thrilled to announce two official NeurIPS 2026 satellite events for this year! These will be held in Paris, France and Atlanta, USA, respectively, running alongside the main venue in Sydney, Australia. Both satellite events will feature keynotes, oral and poster presentations of accepted NeurIPS 2026 papers, as well as workshops. We are planning tutorials, affinity events, and other elements for the satellite sites and we'll share more information as planning advances. Wherever you choose to join us, the entire NeurIPS organizing committee is working hard to deliver an outstanding experience for the whole community! https://t.co/B0v3qCmyBE
- Apr 21, 20266.7x their median
Following positive feedback from other venues, like STOC and ICML, NeurIPS is pleased to announce a new initiative in partnership with Google: for NeurIPS 2026, authors will have access to Google's Paper Assistant Tool (PAT) to help improve their submissions. This program offers authors the opportunity to receive free, automated, and actionable feedback on their manuscripts before the final deadline, private to the authors. It is a completely optional service that is kept strictly private to the authors and will not be used in the review process. Read more in our blog post: https://t.co/TSipYCJ3CG
- Jun 2, 20266.1x their median
This year, the NeurIPS 2026 Position Paper Track made the decision to require that all papers be substantially human-written, with AI used for only copy-editing or similar peripheral changes to the main text! For more details, please check our blogpost: https://t.co/wrWuMQJwrx
- Mar 26, 20266.3x their median
NeurIPS is aware of the community's concerns regarding the list of sanctions. NeurIPS is an inclusive community focused on free scientific discourse. We deeply value the research that comes from everyone in our community. The present concerns are not about science or academic freedom. They are about legal requirements that apply to the NeurIPS Foundation, which is responsible for complying with sanctions. We are actively consulting legal counsel to fully understand the legal constraints and we will update the NeurIPS community as soon as we have reliable guidance from our lawyers.
- Jul 12, 20263.3x their median
📢 NeurIPS 2026 Call for Educational Resources is now open! The NeurIPS 2026 Education Track invites researchers and educators to create accessible, reusable materials that teach emerging AI concepts to broad audiences. We welcome submissions in many formats, including code notebooks, short videos, lecture notes, slide decks, interactive demos, visual explanations, and other self-contained learning resources. Accepted submissions will be presented at the main conference in Sydney as talks or posters, made available through the NeurIPS website, and curated into the official NeurIPS 2026 Education Track repository. 🗓 Submission deadline: September 4, 2026 (AOE) 🔗 Learn more and submit: https://t.co/d6cFTAfZoQ
- Jul 28, 20263.3x their median
A clarification on the timeframe for rebuttals and author discussion, for all three tracks at NeurIPS 2026. Rebuttals can be posted until August 3rd AOE. This includes any back and forth with the reviewers. The "rebuttal" button and "official comment" button will both be treated equivalently - the difference in terminology between the two is to facilitate discussion during the discussion period on OpenReview. This also means you are allowed to post several comments, with a total of over 10000 words. Please post your answers to the Area Chair's initial-meta reviews via a comment from July 28th and by August 3rd, so that reviewers can see it too. We emphasize that the entire period from July 27 through August 3 AOE is time for authors to respond to reviews, including with additional results or other responses to reviewers as applicable. It is your choice how you wish to divide this time into initial rebuttals and subsequent discussion with reviewers and ACs.
- Oct 17, 20263.0x their median
We are thrilled to announce this years accepted papers for the Journal Track, featuring 64 papers from the Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 16 from the Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), and 8 from the Annals of Statistics (AoS), all of which will be presented across our conference locations in Sydney, Atlanta, and Paris this December at the main conference event, alongside the Main Track, and Evaluations & Datasets Track. You can find the full list of accepted papers in our blog post: https://t.co/h0QJAqZKCu
- May 4, 20262.8x their median
This year, to improve transparency and responsible use of datasets in the NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations and Datasets Track, all dataset submissions are now required to include Responsible AI (RAI) metadata as part of the dataset’s Croissant file. Find out more about this and RAI in our blog post: https://t.co/2bzJvDZfOH
- Apr 17, 20262.8x their median
NeurIPS encourages and benefits from a diversity of papers and ideas, which can be developed in many different ways. This year, Main Track submissions can select a Contribution Type, including General, Theory, Use-Inspired, Concept & Feasibility, and Negative Results. More info at https://t.co/7aHZlnebkE and read some concrete examples in the companion blog post: https://t.co/f3rGAGBROV
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 167K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.443% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 970 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is NeurIPS Conference's engagement rate on X?
- NeurIPS Conference (@NeurIPSConf) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 166,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.051%, NeurIPS Conference sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NeurIPSConf have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @NeurIPSConf post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.23 posts per day across the measured window.