Back to @Nero's profile

MILO engagement report

@Nero - 815K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.138%
of 815K followers
Per impression
0.694%
162K views on a typical post
Reach
19.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
61 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 815K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 162K times each, and 0.694% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MILO's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.138%, MILO sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202662x their median

    Sir Anthony Hopkins says he never tolerated tyrannical directors who believed they could bully actors on set. He recalls one director who started shouting at a young actress while giving her notes. Hopkins immediately stepped in. “Hold it. You raise your voice one decibel to this lady and i’m going. And you my dear, should leave as well” Afterward, the actress thanked him. Hopkins then asked how long the director had been treating her that way. “How long has he been doing that?” She told him it had been happening throughout the entire film. For Hopkins, no performance or movie was worth allowing someone to be humiliated on set. “Don’t raise your voice. It’s a film. It’s a stupid film. That’s all it is. It’s not important.”

    63K6.3K3473133.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202614x their median

    oh fuck off https://t.co/g1czr4u5XD

    13K6381.4K265844K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.9x their median

    This is how civilization dies, 100% hedonism, no family, no roots, no legacy https://t.co/fVeK5ATVfQ

    6.6K3731.6K2714.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20267.7x their median

    i tried not to https://t.co/U3Hz3twazl

    8.2K1612273157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.6x their median

    Imagine being a 12 year old Jewish kid in middle school rn and your friends are talmbout some goyslop, Big Yahu, 109 countries, wooden doors, esoteric hitlerism etc. etc. and you have to kind of awkwardly laugh along to somehow not be the weird one

    8.2K17814346706K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.8x their median

    I know a lot of you Candace people were looking forward to the stream tonight and many of you cancelled plans. I want to apologize but I decided to hump the wife and have a beer instead. See ya tomorrow.

    5.2K1382.2K155820K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.7x their median

    Alcohol is one of the only things we knowingly put into our bodies that makes us feel worse the next day… and somehow we’ve normalized needing it to relax, celebrate, socialize, and have fun.

    6.1K3519841821.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20266.2x their median

    Barack Hussein Obama made this illegal https://t.co/LV86ySPyCD

    6.5K278701233.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.4x their median

    If you are a man in your 40s still looking for love the best way to attract a lot of female interest is to become a serial killer

    5.5K21329258314K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 20262.9x their median

    Thrilled to be included. Obviously, my manuscript is already late. So that’ll be all for now. In the meantime, @rustyrockets How to Become a Christian in 7 Days ships April 20 https://t.co/sCBXZ6bcWF Thank you @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork https://t.co/LY54luk5R3

    2.6K381318201.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 815K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 162K times each, and 0.694% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

What is MILO's engagement rate on X?
MILO (@Nero) has an engagement rate of 0.138%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 815,447 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.138%, MILO sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Nero have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Nero post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going