PlayerSells
Back to @NepentheZ's profile

NepentheZ engagement report

@NepentheZ - 891K followers on X

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 891K followers
Per impression
0.883%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
4.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
319
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 319 interactions against 891K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.883% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #thfc.

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #fc27, #thfc.

Compared with accounts its own size

NepentheZ's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.007% to 0.047%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link13% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 170 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202660x their median

    #thfc ⚪️ Omar Marmoush fee is expected to be £59M. The same fee City paid to get him from Frankfurt. This is because Eintracht Frankfurt a 15% sell on clause for any PROFIT made on Marmoush by City. This is why Spurs paid more money for Savinho. The agreement is a DOUBLE DEAL. 🤝🇧🇷🇪🇬

    18K7243144838.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202634x their median

    From Bronze to 90 rated in 8 years 🔥 What a journey 👏 https://t.co/wr0fZk9Vni

    11K75125502K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202630x their median

    How is Cubarsi higher rated? 🤔 Garcia is better in EVERY stat but DRI 💀 https://t.co/h5WKRBHRIX

    9.5K725727575K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202610x their median

    Savinho being sold for £80m is just incomprehensable. The guy barely gets minues, is below bang average and is being sold for a HUGE profit. Mean while, we can't ship a player for a bag of freddos.

    3.1K32653239K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20267.0x their median

    EA have legit lost the plot with some of the ratings / OVR's of players. You've got 83/84 rated players significantly better then 88+ rateds, you've got 85 Rated CB's from the same league and nation with insanely different cards, one being stupid OP and another being useless. We've got players who haven't played much due to injury for years holding on to unreal cards, whilst some players who have had an injury hit season have been nerfed into the ground. There seems to be absolutely 0 correlation with face card stats and OVR at all. Going to be an interesting year!

    2.1K23645247K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.2x their median

    French football, ranked. Discover @Ligue1 27 highest-rated players in #FC27. Which rating caught your eye? Pre-order now: https://t.co/Hu8mF8e3v9 https://t.co/kF8Yx5hgXD

    1.8K816254778K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.5x their median

    🚨NEW: Arsenal have demanded €60m to sell Gabriel Martinelli, €20m to sell Gabriel Jesus, €30m for Fabio Viera and €40m for Ethan Nwaneri.

    1.6K833217229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.4x their median

    🚨 According to ESPN, Arsenal want to sell Gabriel Martinelli & have offered the player to several clubs, including ‘peripherals’ markets, such as Turkey & Saudi Arabia. Sources close to the talks even revealed Turkish clubs have shown a willingness to meet Arsenal’s €50m asking price, but the player has made it clear to Arsenal that he is NOT interested in playing in alternative leagues at this time. Sources also noted that Premier League clubs would match Arsenal’s asking price, but the club have no interest in strengthening direct rivals in England. ❌🇧🇷 [Bruno Andrade, @ESPNBrasil]

    1.5K927233343K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.5x their median

    🚨 FC27 OFFICIAL ARSENAL RATINGS 🤯 🇪🇸 Merino 51 Pace he lost a leg 🕊️🕊️🕊️ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Saka 87 🇸🇪 Gyokeres 86 Agree ? 🤔 Next team? 👇👀 https://t.co/t8yma2XHXp

    1.1K311731312.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.8x their median

    🚨🚨 Pretty sure EA have messed up the new evo and will remove it, so get it done ASAP! It's 25k, repeatable 4 times. Gives 5*/5* and doesn't touch PS/PS+ It makes cards FUTTIES (which they charge 100k for in the cosmetics section) It's only a +2, and gives a decent global stat boost. I'd be shocked if this is still there in a few hours.

    8309402219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fc27#thfc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 319 interactions against 891K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.883% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #thfc.

What is NepentheZ's engagement rate on X?
NepentheZ (@NepentheZ) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 890,979 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NepentheZ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NepentheZ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going