Back to @NepentheZ's profile

NepentheZ engagement report

@NepentheZ - 890K followers on X

Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.024%
of 890K followers
Per impression
0.521%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
4.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
209
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.37/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 209 interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.521% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 96x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #sorare.

Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #fc27, #sorare.

Compared with accounts its own size

NepentheZ's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.024%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video53% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 205 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202696x their median

    #thfc βšͺ️ Omar Marmoush fee is expected to be Β£59M. The same fee City paid to get him from Frankfurt. This is because Eintracht Frankfurt a 15% sell on clause for any PROFIT made on Marmoush by City. This is why Spurs paid more money for Savinho. The agreement is a DOUBLE DEAL. πŸ€πŸ‡§πŸ‡·πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡¬

    18K7703375149.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202652x their median

    From Bronze to 90 rated in 8 years πŸ”₯ What a journey πŸ‘ https://t.co/wr0fZk9Vni

    11K74125520K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202646x their median

    How is Cubarsi higher rated? πŸ€” Garcia is better in EVERY stat but DRI πŸ’€ https://t.co/h5WKRBHRIX

    9.5K725727578K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202623x their median

    The "Gold re-roll" Streamlined SBC is unreal, especially for coins / tradable card value. Gold 75 discards at 533 Coins Gold 83 discards at 589 Coins Gold 75 = 90 Gems Gold 83 = 410 Gems Gold 83 to purchase = 650/700 Coins Constantly selling / quick selling unsellable gold cards to enable you to buy 83 rated golds makes this 78+ x2 SBC come in at 2,150 - 2,300 coins. You need 3x 83s and 1x Bronze. That's INSANE value for a 78+ x2, especially this early in the game cycle! You're also guaranteed 280 Gem value back as a bare minimum!

    4.6K76382538K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202615x their median

    Savinho being sold for Β£80m is just incomprehensable. The guy barely gets minues, is below bang average and is being sold for a HUGE profit. Mean while, we can't ship a player for a bag of freddos.

    3.1K32633249K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    EA have legit lost the plot with some of the ratings / OVR's of players. You've got 83/84 rated players significantly better then 88+ rateds, you've got 85 Rated CB's from the same league and nation with insanely different cards, one being stupid OP and another being useless. We've got players who haven't played much due to injury for years holding on to unreal cards, whilst some players who have had an injury hit season have been nerfed into the ground. There seems to be absolutely 0 correlation with face card stats and OVR at all. Going to be an interesting year!

    2.1K23645247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    On FC 27 I REALLY like the Coins per game you can earn in Rivals.... IF you win. I was getting 2,000 - 3,000 per win. I lost 1 game 5-4 and only got 980 something. This will only encourage sandbagging / forced relegations so people get easier games and easier wins for easier coins. If EA just bump up the coins for a loss by about 50% I think it would be a situation where you'd be happy to play no matter what!

    2.2K10361389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20269.6x their median

    French football, ranked. Discover @Ligue1 27 highest-rated players in #FC27. Which rating caught your eye? Pre-order now: https://t.co/Hu8mF8e3v9 https://t.co/kF8Yx5hgXD

    1.8K866354820K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.5x their median

    Chelsea have the "best attack in the league" 0.35 xg against Arsenal. Arsenal have the "worst attack in the league" 2.11 xg against Chelsea. Cool. When Chelsea lose Cucu and Enzo and can't kick the living shit out of the opponenet for no remorse, it's a very different game

    1.8K5613316185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20268.4x their median

    🚨NEW: Arsenal have demanded €60m to sell Gabriel Martinelli, €20m to sell Gabriel Jesus, €30m for Fabio Viera and €40m for Ethan Nwaneri.

    1.6K833217229K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fc27#sorare

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 209 interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.521% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 96x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #sorare.

What is NepentheZ's engagement rate on X?
NepentheZ (@NepentheZ) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 70 original posts from the last 30 days against 890,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.024%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NepentheZ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NepentheZ post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going