NepentheZ engagement report
@NepentheZ - 890K followers on X
Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 209 interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.521% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 96x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #sorare.
Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #fc27, #sorare.
Compared with accounts its own size
NepentheZ's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.024%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 53% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 205 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 202696x their median
#thfc βͺοΈ Omar Marmoush fee is expected to be Β£59M. The same fee City paid to get him from Frankfurt. This is because Eintracht Frankfurt a 15% sell on clause for any PROFIT made on Marmoush by City. This is why Spurs paid more money for Savinho. The agreement is a DOUBLE DEAL. π€π§π·πͺπ¬
- Aug 19, 202652x their median
From Bronze to 90 rated in 8 years π₯ What a journey π https://t.co/wr0fZk9Vni
- Aug 18, 202646x their median
How is Cubarsi higher rated? π€ Garcia is better in EVERY stat but DRI π https://t.co/h5WKRBHRIX
- Sep 20, 202623x their median
The "Gold re-roll" Streamlined SBC is unreal, especially for coins / tradable card value. Gold 75 discards at 533 Coins Gold 83 discards at 589 Coins Gold 75 = 90 Gems Gold 83 = 410 Gems Gold 83 to purchase = 650/700 Coins Constantly selling / quick selling unsellable gold cards to enable you to buy 83 rated golds makes this 78+ x2 SBC come in at 2,150 - 2,300 coins. You need 3x 83s and 1x Bronze. That's INSANE value for a 78+ x2, especially this early in the game cycle! You're also guaranteed 280 Gem value back as a bare minimum!
- Aug 20, 202615x their median
Savinho being sold for Β£80m is just incomprehensable. The guy barely gets minues, is below bang average and is being sold for a HUGE profit. Mean while, we can't ship a player for a bag of freddos.
- Aug 18, 202611x their median
EA have legit lost the plot with some of the ratings / OVR's of players. You've got 83/84 rated players significantly better then 88+ rateds, you've got 85 Rated CB's from the same league and nation with insanely different cards, one being stupid OP and another being useless. We've got players who haven't played much due to injury for years holding on to unreal cards, whilst some players who have had an injury hit season have been nerfed into the ground. There seems to be absolutely 0 correlation with face card stats and OVR at all. Going to be an interesting year!
- Sep 21, 202611x their median
On FC 27 I REALLY like the Coins per game you can earn in Rivals.... IF you win. I was getting 2,000 - 3,000 per win. I lost 1 game 5-4 and only got 980 something. This will only encourage sandbagging / forced relegations so people get easier games and easier wins for easier coins. If EA just bump up the coins for a loss by about 50% I think it would be a situation where you'd be happy to play no matter what!
- Aug 20, 20269.6x their median
French football, ranked. Discover @Ligue1 27 highest-rated players in #FC27. Which rating caught your eye? Pre-order now: https://t.co/Hu8mF8e3v9 https://t.co/kF8Yx5hgXD
- Sep 6, 20269.5x their median
Chelsea have the "best attack in the league" 0.35 xg against Arsenal. Arsenal have the "worst attack in the league" 2.11 xg against Chelsea. Cool. When Chelsea lose Cucu and Enzo and can't kick the living shit out of the opponenet for no remorse, it's a very different game
- Aug 12, 20268.4x their median
π¨NEW: Arsenal have demanded β¬60m to sell Gabriel Martinelli, β¬20m to sell Gabriel Jesus, β¬30m for Fabio Viera and β¬40m for Ethan Nwaneri.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 209 interactions against 890K followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.521% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 96x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #sorare.
- What is NepentheZ's engagement rate on X?
- NepentheZ (@NepentheZ) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 70 original posts from the last 30 days against 890,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.024%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NepentheZ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NepentheZ post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.37 posts per day across the measured window.