Back to @NaturPictures's profile

Latido Terrestre engagement report

@NaturPictures - 918K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 918K followers
Per impression
2.26%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
2.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
453
interactions (median)
Saved
0.097%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 453 interactions against 918K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 88x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Latido Terrestre's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, Latido Terrestre sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 133 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202688x their median

    Adoptó un gato cuando era una cría; ahora tiene 23 años y todavía sale a recibirlo cuando llega a casa. https://t.co/A96XIxdIZT

    38K2.0K8329395K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202679x their median

    El sonido del granizo al caer sobre una ladera cubierta de pizarra. https://t.co/1eh9ZyEC3e

    32K3.6K992394.0M viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 202656x their median

    Imagina caminar por una ruta en Costa Rica y encontrarte con decenas de enormes lentes apuntando al bosque... hasta que haces zoom y descubres a este imponente guardián alado. https://t.co/6kAMuhngoG

    24K1.3K66182.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202649x their median

    Un hombre libera un árbol de una cuerda apretada tras años de crecimiento. https://t.co/4mopxKMgbm

    22K348126305.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202639x their median

    Una madre berrendo no quiso abandonar a su cría atrapada en alambre; mira cómo un guarda forestal la libera en medio de la helada ❤️ https://t.co/LfRQskMDua

    16K91111061.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202627x their median

    Estaba tan feliz en su primer día tras ser adoptado que ni siquiera podía dormir. Trataba de acostarse pero la cola no paraba de moverla de pura alegría 🐶❤️🏠 https://t.co/egYifaQG5C

    12K8203813114K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202619x their median

    Ya es mayor, pero a este perro todavía le encanta cavar un hoyo en la playa🥰 https://t.co/FdrQib2GqJ

    8.1K371231252K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    Los caballos mongoles forman este remolino alrededor del fuego para protegerse del viento helado y espantar a los insectos. Un comportamiento social fascinante que muestra la increíble adaptación de la especie 🐴🔥 https://t.co/DQ2AvKvWzp

    4.9K72199108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20269.7x their median

    Una perra dio a luz a 11 cachorros y los está amamantando, mientras el padre está ocupado con otras cosas. https://t.co/uAVI3Zz5PX

    4.0K24760723.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20269.2x their median

    No está pescando como tú crees. Mira lo que saca ese palo. https://t.co/m4jH0lzY7l

    4.0K96953917K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 453 interactions against 918K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 88x its own typical post.

What is Latido Terrestre's engagement rate on X?
Latido Terrestre (@NaturPictures) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 918,272 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, Latido Terrestre sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NaturPictures have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NaturPictures post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going