Back to @NatalieAmiri's profile

Natalie Amiri engagement report

@NatalieAmiri - 152K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.109%
of 152K followers
Per impression
0.135%
123K views on a typical post
Reach
80.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
166
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 166 interactions against 152K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Posts are seen about 123K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 80.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 108x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #iran.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.109%, Natalie Amiri sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 179 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 2023108x their median

    Mein Kommentar in den @tagesthemen zu Islamisten, die in Deutschland die Terrorangriffe der #Hamas auf Israel feiern. https://t.co/C2X74Ak5Gj

    13K3.0K1.3K4331.2M viewsView on X
  • Dec 30, 202517x their median

    صبح چهار‌شنبه، چهار مرد و یک زن با حکم دادگاه اصل ۴۹ انقلاب اصفهان به خانه‌ی پدر و مادرم حمله کردند. سه ساعت با دوربین فیلم گرفتند و هرچه بود بردند: پول، طلا، وسایل ارتباطی و کتاب‌های فراوان… خانه‌ای که بعد از رفتنشان ماند، نیازی به توضیح اضافه ندارد. جرم: باور به آیین بهائی. https://t.co/LhFz7oBwdo

    2.5K25110824247K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20263.0x their median

    NEW: Iran is attempting to condition US-Iran nuclear negotiations on the United States compelling Israel to halt operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Tying the US-Iran nuclear negotiations to the Lebanon issue not only helps Iran advance its strategic objective of preserving Hezbollah but also enables the regime to delay nuclear negotiations while reaping the economic benefits of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU). Other Key Takeaways: Iran likely seeks to postpone nuclear negotiations in order to avoid having to make concessions on its nuclear program while benefiting from the economic relief that is included in the MoU. Iranian officials have not indicated any willingness to concede on key nuclear issues, such as Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile and ability to enrich uranium on Iranian territory. Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a new ceasefire on June 19. This ceasefire probably does not meet Iran’s demand for a “complete ceasefire” in Lebanon because Iranian officials and media have repeatedly argued that a “complete ceasefire” in Lebanon requires the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanese territory. Iran is reopening the Strait of Hormuz in a way that retains Iranian control over the strait rather than restoring the pre-war status quo. Some elements of the Iranian regime have argued that Iran should close the Strait of Hormuz to extract further concessions from the US, such as securing an end to Israeli operations in Lebanon and an Israeli withdrawal. The IRGC has formed multiple Iraqi militia cells that directly report to the IRGC, instead of pre-existing Iranian-backed Iraqi militias, in order to conduct attacks on Gulf countries hosting US forces, according to eight Iraqi sources speaking to Reuters on June 19. Iran reportedly formed these new militia cells to deflect responsibility for attacks from established militias amid increased US pressure on the Iraqi federal government to disarm Iraqi militias. It is also possible that Iran formed these new militia cells as part of an initial effort to build a new, loyal cadre of ideological militias over which Iran has strong control and would supplement the political activity of existing Iranian-backed Iraqi actors.

    3241282616268K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    🔴 BREAKING: The Iran-backed Houthis reached the Yemeni town ⁠of Dhubab across ⁠from the island of ⁠Perim, two Yemeni government sources tell Reuters. https://t.co/n0bh8Ij3PI

    12722710123K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 2026

    Signing of the MOU between Iran and the US will not be tomorrow, the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson says, as per Iranian media. The possibility that it will happen in the coming days is not ruled out, Baghaei said as per Tasnim.

    65154271K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 2026

    Hamidreza Azizi: This is what Iran’s agreement with the U.S. really means https://t.co/Cy3EDtMHkF

    54612134K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 2026

    Trump was so desperate to end his disastrous war of choice with Iran that he accepted a ceasefire deal that is filled with ambiguities. That lies behind the renewed battle for control of the Strait of Hormuz, which was never an issue before Trump's war.  https://t.co/r6wEiFU0gC

    42186113K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 2026

    Der getötete Oberste Führer Ali Khamenei wird am 9. Juli beigesetzt, berichten staatliche Medien der Islamischen Republik Iran. https://t.co/JrGoJ1DQZ7

    222805.0K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 2026

    Trump: „Die Vereinigten Staaten werden Iran heute Nacht sehr hart treffen. In nicht allzu ferner Zukunft werden wir die Kontrolle über die Insel Kharg und andere Standorte der Ölinfrastruktur übernehmen, und wir werden die vollständige Kontrolle über ihre Öl-und Gasmärkte haben.“ https://t.co/6ZN0rT2nAp

    164823.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026

    By hitting #Jordan, #Iran may be trying to drive a wedge between #Amman & #Washington and deepen popular opposition to US military presence. But except for 2 episodes for which Jordan paid dearly (1967 and 1990/91) the kingdom's leaders have stood with America, which has been a reliable source of security for nearly 70 years, and they are unlikely to change course. https://t.co/M7KldzkduR

    1771339K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#iran

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 166 interactions against 152K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Posts are seen about 123K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 80.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 108x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Natalie Amiri's engagement rate on X?
Natalie Amiri (@NatalieAmiri) has an engagement rate of 0.109%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 152,400 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.109%, Natalie Amiri sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NatalieAmiri have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @NatalieAmiri post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going