NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain engagement report
@NaoXprotocol - 241K followers on X
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.039%, NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 118.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 84% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 608 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 202632x their median
breaking: our website
- Jul 17, 20262.6x their median
https://t.co/ZZPeITaId3
- Aug 18, 20261.7x their median
The post-quantum revolution is being televised. Every system on this list evolved before it had to. Cash to Bitcoin. Banks to DeFi. Ownership, art, identity, all rebuilt on-chain. Blockchains are next. Not because they failed, but because the maths underneath them has an expiry date and the replacement already exists. NaoX is that next row: a Layer 1 where transactions can be signed with post-quantum cryptography from genesis. Nothing to migrate later, because it was built on the other side. The evolution continues.
- Aug 17, 20261.5x their median
How many qubits does it take to break crypto? - 20,000,000: the estimate in 2019 - 1,000,000: the estimate in 2025 - 100,000: the estimate in 2026 - 500,000: for ECC-256, the curve behind ECDSA and most wallets, per @GoogleQuantumAI Qubits are the unit of quantum computation. Once a machine has enough of them running with low enough error rates, Shor's algorithm turns the maths behind every wallet and chain into a solvable problem. The estimate has fallen 200x in seven years. Every revision has moved the same way. Nobody knows the year the machines catch up. That is why NaoX did not build for a qubit count. Transactions can be signed with ML-DSA-87, FIPS 204, NIST security Level 5, verified natively by the chain. Validator entry post-quantum since genesis. The takeaway: the number that matters is falling, and no one can say where it stops. The only decision in your control is which cryptography sits under your assets before it does. NaoX made that decision at genesis.
- Sep 5, 20261.5x their median
2026. The quantum dominos have continued to fall. 🁢 The @WhiteHouse quantum summit puts $2.2B behind the national effort, with industry aligned on fault tolerance by 2028 🁢 The UK's @NCSC publishes its migration workshop report: 2028 and 2031 "will come round quickly" 🁢 @googlecloud sets full post-quantum readiness for 2029, with hybrid ML-KEM key exchange already live on https://t.co/6Rif0dvCFk 🁢 @Cloudflare reports over 65% of human traffic to its network is now post-quantum encrypted, and targets full post-quantum security by 2029 🁢 Japan switches on Shunkai, its first full-stack neutral-atom quantum computer 🁢 @IBM buys a second qubit physics outright, acquiring HRL Laboratories 🁢 @coinbase's independent quantum advisory board publishes its full report: crypto-agility, phased migration, and a warning that swapping in ML-DSA would cut Bitcoin's transaction capacity severalfold 🁢 HAWK, a @NIST post-quantum candidate, is broken by AI-assisted cryptanalysis in around sixty hours and withdrawn. The vetting works at machine speed 🁢 @VitalikButerin: "Ethereum will be quantum-safe." Quantum resistance moves up the @ethereum roadmap, and researchers draft a post-quantum-ready validator deposit contract 🁢 @StarkWareLtd confirms the first quantum-resistant transaction on Bitcoin mainnet. @Blockstream follows with SHRINCS, the first post-quantum signature proposal built for Bitcoin 🁢 @NaoXprotocol crosses 100,000 transactions on mainnet, every one carrying a post-quantum signature. Next phase: onboarding validators and opening the chain to builders and users Each one pushed the next. 2026 continues to be the great quantum awakening.
- Aug 22, 20261.5x their median
Up, up, and away. 100,000 transactions on the NaoX Post-Quantum Blockchain, and counting. 100,000+. Each one safe from a quantum attack. Happy Weekend. https://t.co/wBHGjEIt5T
- Aug 24, 2026
Introducing The Post-Quantum Experience 🎙️ Episode 1 is live, and we're delighted to welcome our first guest: @GraemeMoore, Head of Strategy at @projecteleven, the team behind some of the sharpest research on quantum risk anywhere in the industry. We uncover the quantum threat to Bitcoin, Q-Day, why quantum-proofing starts today, and much, much more. New episodes every week, with the founders, cryptographers and researchers building the post-quantum future. Watch Episode 1 below 👇
- Aug 26, 2026
What makes crypto uniquely exposed to quantum computing? Banking, healthcare, government all run on the same vulnerable encryption. So why does Bitcoin get attacked first? @GraemeMoore of @projecteleven explains👇 https://t.co/GBTrE2TSyQ
- Aug 20, 2026
N̶e̶t̶f̶l̶i̶x̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶C̶h̶i̶l̶l̶? Post-Quantum and Chill 🍿 Episode one of our weekly X Spaces series, hosted by our team. The latest quantum news, what it means for crypto, and what's coming over the horizon. ⏰ Tomorrow, 2pm UTC. See you there! https://t.co/uhUgFXYAxR
- Aug 19, 2026
Q: More chains will start claiming post-quantum signatures. What's the one question that separates them? A: One word. Where. Q: Where what? A: Where the post-quantum signature actually gets verified. There are only three places it can happen, and they are not equal. Off-chain, by a wallet or a custody server, which then submits an ordinary classical transaction. The chain never sees the post-quantum signature at all. You're trusting whoever runs that software. In a smart contract, via account abstraction. The chain executes it, but as bytecode: expensive, gas-heavy, and without any guarantee it runs in constant time. It's an application feature, not a property of the chain. In the protocol itself, as a native operation every node runs as part of consensus. That's the only one where "post-quantum" describes the chain rather than something sitting on top of it. Q: And NaoX? A: The third one. Post-quantum verification is built into the protocol, the same way Ethereum verifies classical signatures with ecrecover. Every node runs the same check on the same ML-DSA-87 signature and reaches the same answer, and that answer is part of consensus. Q: Numbers? A: About 38.5 microseconds per verification. Roughly 26,000 per second on a single CPU core. Native, constant-time code, so timing leaks nothing. Callable by any contract on the chain. Q: Why does it matter? A: The verdict on a post-quantum signature comes from the chain, not from an intermediary whose software you can't audit. And because any contract can call the verifier, post-quantum authorisation becomes a building block. Vaults, registries, bridges, all without an oracle or a trusted server. If the chain doesn't verify it, the chain doesn't know it happened.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
- What is NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain's engagement rate on X?
- NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain (@NaoXprotocol) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 240,824 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.039%, NaoX | Post-Quantum Chain sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NaoXprotocol have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NaoXprotocol post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.