Back to @NahamSec's profile

Ben Sadeghipour engagement report

@NahamSec - 252K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 252K followers
Per impression
1.56%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
4.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
162
interactions (median)
Saved
0.231%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 36% are part of a thread and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 512 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ben Sadeghipour's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Ben Sadeghipour sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link55% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 55% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 199 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 20263.2x their median

    ๐ŸšจWe reported KindaRails2Shell, a critical RCE in Ruby on Rails via Active Storage. Itโ€™s not a one-shot RCE, but the preconditions are kinda common under default configurations. Patch your applications now! https://t.co/0ZufRhZ5st

    39099131090K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.3x their median

    Vulnerability disclosures hit different when itโ€™s behind closed doors ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/Be2q21T0Pu

    351127529K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.0x their median

    i had AI read all 1,520 bug bounty reports i've submitted since 2014 and told it not to protect my feelings. Three things i didn't want to hear: - the bugs that built my career don't exist anymore - my dupe rate went UP over 12 years - 685 of those reports never paid me a dollar ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผhttps://t.co/R8DhhE706A

    3031411222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20261.9x their median

    Private disclosure party ๐Ÿšจ "Melting the Frontier Labs" with @0xLupin. They're dropping some wild research including how they may have compromised a frontier lab via a supply chain attack. Talk followed by food+drinks. Comment "npm install" for the RSVP link ๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/W4wZCRGYbH

    1891792223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.8x their median

    Blueprint to Making $100K with @CaidoIO (Free Bug Bounty Course) with @amrelsagaei ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ https://t.co/uHqjtljrva https://t.co/6MbLCBTcvu

    259342013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.7x their median

    I Went to the World's Biggest Hacker Conference (DEFCON VLOG) ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ https://t.co/fEt1lvTdfs https://t.co/HQa4FXMPE7

    241199012K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026

    We are doing something absolutely crazy for #NahamCon2026 ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€ I hope you guys are excited!

    198715214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026

    I sat down with @TakSec and he taught me everything I needed to know about Indirect Prompt Injection using a free custom lab on @hackinghub_io! https://t.co/gikPheDolh https://t.co/QTPSLFCoNA

    184219319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    A little late, but here are some of my favorite memories from @defcon. Huge thanks to everyone who came by the panels, workshops, and talks I hosted. It was so good seeing you all! ๐Ÿ™ https://t.co/I1gD2hKYg5

    17356011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    I've been making more and more long form videos (60+minutes) and really enjoying them. Why did I ever considered it was a good idea to commit to condensed 15 minute videos ๐Ÿซ 

    163410010K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video, 36% are part of a thread and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 512 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.

What is Ben Sadeghipour's engagement rate on X?
Ben Sadeghipour (@NahamSec) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 251,666 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Ben Sadeghipour sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NahamSec have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NahamSec post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going