Back to @NahBabyNahNah's profile

UnfilteredAmerica engagement report

@NahBabyNahNah - 177K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 177K followers
Per impression
0%
281 views on a typical post
Reach
0.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 177K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 281 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

UnfilteredAmerica's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, UnfilteredAmerica sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 299 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 26, 2023

    How everyone feels.... (No, Mr Twitter Police, I'm not really saying we should pull out our muskets on the US government) https://t.co/ivCpRzNTnQ

    5.6K1.9K532109335K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    That knock at dawn isn’t just noise. Watch the moment the room stiffens, the look on Omar’s face, and the barely-there reaction you’ll miss if you blink. Something shifts in that second—before anyone says a word. Trust me, you’ll want to see what unfol… https://t.co/BUeDtGPjuq https://t.co/zzV1RnC5cR

    6300354 viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    Sydney Sweeney doesn’t wait for a memo from culture’s gatekeepers to decide how she shows up in an ad—she just does. But not every provocateur deserves a cheer, either. The clash isn’t new; what’s wild is watching the tension play out in real time. This … https://t.co/dDUokdUu0t https://t.co/T7mNaDR0dp

    5110704 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    That look when a $100K AmEx ask triggers a stare-down you can feel through the screen. Trump's scowl, Rubio's tight jaw—and Guilfoyle unfazed, delivering the number like it’s nothing. You’ll hear the room get quieter than a library before a storm. Curiou… https://t.co/lyWVzfx4mM https://t.co/A5BFSuNNdV

    4110896 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    That code name for Ilhan Omar’s raid is wild enough to reboot my faith in… something. You think you’ve seen everything until you hear this reveal and the room goes quiet for a split second. No spoilers—watch what happens when the truth finally lands and… https://t.co/Hw2paOfEyh https://t.co/8me59mIbMb

    4100275 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    What did Omar say right after that raid that has everyone talking? The line that might redefine who’s pointing fingers here is coming next to a confession you didn’t see coming. Watch the clip to see the moment she pins it on the highest office in the la… https://t.co/0RQZq6AYxo https://t.co/bswczr7TQh

    2110161 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    Missed appearances, a sudden return, and the real reason you’ll want to watch this clip unfold. He’s not telling you what you think he will. The moment someone weighs in—watch the tension build, the timing, the body language—you’ll understand why this ha… https://t.co/FWDg82DmXq https://t.co/yGTiIBb06r

    2020590 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    This finals remix is personal longer than the score says. Two teams, one league, and a rivalry that seems to fight itself into every corner of the court. Watch the moment the arena quiets—the kind of silence that only heavy expectations can summon—and te… https://t.co/63oqZgUWLx https://t.co/hDbfqpXghH

    2010484 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    Something feels off about the timeline here. Watch the clip and tell me if the reaction in the room matches the raid timing you just saw. There’s a moment that may have you rethinking who’s really surprised. You’ll want to see the look, not the words. Wa… https://t.co/K6OmwpVcoH https://t.co/0C53LBZhha

    1200674 viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    You’ll hear the room go quiet and then… that moment. An undercover clip that makes you tilt your head and wonder what you just heard. Watch the reaction, watch the timing, watch the line cross the room as something slips out in a way you didn’t see comi… https://t.co/BumqnTR6JR https://t.co/1zKkKAqVSQ

    1110524 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 177K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 281 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions.

What is UnfilteredAmerica's engagement rate on X?
UnfilteredAmerica (@NahBabyNahNah) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 176,894 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, UnfilteredAmerica sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NahBabyNahNah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NahBabyNahNah post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going