Back to @NadaAJones's profile

๐ŸŒŸHope๐ŸŒŸ engagement report

@NadaAJones - 284K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.443%
of 284K followers
Per impression
6.23%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
7.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.392%
79 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 0.443%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 6.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 161K interactions, about 128x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐ŸŒŸHope๐ŸŒŸ's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.443%, ๐ŸŒŸHope๐ŸŒŸ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video87% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 87% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 145 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 2026128x their median

    No juzgues a un hombre por el auto que conduce https://t.co/ua5KBjLJcx

    149K10K1.3K8187.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202672x their median

    Oopsy. ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿคฃ https://t.co/cgnyrz8vno

    86K4.5K34411114M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202658x their median

    https://t.co/SLtgwA1VUL

    68K4.8K322139758K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202646x their median

    https://t.co/aKazjpxwH6

    54K3.6K16770563K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202627x their median

    ๐ŸšจSHOCKING | Father Patricio Alfredo Sanchez Molinari dies after a large crucifix fell on him in Ecuador's Guayaquil https://t.co/CCDVXZfvTH

    27K3.3K1.9K1.0K15M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202623x their median

    Turns out the rise in sea levels wasn't climate change after all!!๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/iRKcSKHfFT

    23K5.0K1.1K392479K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202618x their median

    A Texas mail carrier learned that a dog he had befriended on his old delivery route was waiting in an animal shelter after his owner died. Before the shelter opened, he was already there to adopt him. USPS letter carrier Ian Burke had first met Floyd while delivering mail to the home of Ken Meyer, a Vietnam veteran who used a wheelchair, in Denton, Texas. Floyd was Kenโ€™s service dog, and he made quite an impression on the mailman. During their first encounter, he slipped out through the door and charged toward Ian like an excited puppy. Over time, Ian got to know both Ken and Floyd. For about a year and a half, he enjoyed stopping by their home, delivering the mail and checking in on them. Then his route changed. Another carrier took over, and Ianโ€™s regular visits came to an end. In May 2025, Ken passed away. Floyd was surrendered to the City of Denton Animal Shelter, leaving the dog who had been his companion in need of a new home. Over Memorial Day weekend, Ian heard a coworker talking about a dog at the shelter. The description sounded familiar. He asked whether the dog was Floyd. When the answer was yes, Ian knew he wanted to bring him home. He arrived at approximately 9:50 a.m., ten minutes before the shelter opened, to make sure he was first in line. Floyd wouldnโ€™t have to start over with someone who knew nothing about him. Waiting for him was the mailman who had known him since he was a puppy. That day, Ian adopted Floyd. He later explained that this was a dog his former customer had loved and cherished. Taking care of him meant something personal. โ€œI kind of felt responsible to take care of him,โ€ Ian said. He believed Ken would be pleased to know that his former mailman was giving Floyd a good home. In a later photograph shared by USPS, Floyd sat on Ianโ€™s lap, settled into the life they now shared. Once, Ian had been someone who stopped by and left. Now he was the person Floyd stayed with. Kenโ€™s love for his dog had been part of what Ian remembered about his old route. And after Ken was gone, Ian made sure that dog still had someone to come home to โ™ฅ๏ธ๐Ÿพ

    20K3.0K327119166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202617x their median

    Ozempic face https://t.co/W1GMC96ICz

    16K4.6K932240605K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202615x their median

    https://t.co/lWlXghVfuh

    17K1.6K281167440K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202614x their median

    Spicy baby skunks..๐Ÿฆจ๐Ÿ˜… https://t.co/WHPdMxdTWx

    17K1.4K146134538K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 0.443%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 6.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 161K interactions, about 128x its own typical post.

What is ๐ŸŒŸHope๐ŸŒŸ's engagement rate on X?
๐ŸŒŸHope๐ŸŒŸ (@NadaAJones) has an engagement rate of 0.443%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 283,649 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.443%, ๐ŸŒŸHope๐ŸŒŸ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NadaAJones have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NadaAJones post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going