Back to @NZZ's profile

NZZ engagement report

@NZZ - 496K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 496K followers
Per impression
0.137%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 496K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.137% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.294% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 213 interactions, about 107x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NZZ's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, NZZ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 202 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 2026107x their median

    Die Rechtsanwältin und Gemeindepräsidentin von Kilchberg ist eine überzeugte Gegnerin der EU-Abkommen. An die Politiker appelliert sie, sie sollten die Vertragstexte lesen. So schwer sei das nicht. https://t.co/xwlho4flvF

    151491303.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202660x their median

    Sie zogen nach Syrien und in den Irak, um sich dem IS anzuschliessen. Nun wollen 25 französische Terroristen zurück nach Frankreich – und ausgerechnet der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte soll ihnen dabei helfen. Das ist schwer erträglich,... https://t.co/rTZDPgaTSw

    69341523.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202625x their median

    Der amerikanische Präsident tischt regelmässig Halbwahrheiten und Falschbehauptungen zum Ukraine-Krieg auf. Drei Beispiele aus seinem jüngsten Fernsehinterview illustrieren, wie er dabei vorgeht. https://t.co/6nmSlhp5v2

    14102512.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202624x their median

    Die Ausschreitungen wurzeln in der Ăśberforderung einer Generation, die von ihren Eltern alleingelassen wurde. Und nun kommt die Quittung. https://t.co/3jmNyJ0Bkc

    733613.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202619x their median

    Kostet ein neues Atomkraftwerk wirklich bis zu 43 Milliarden Franken? Professoren der ETH bezweifeln das und sprechen von «Irreführung». Sechs Monate vor der Volksabstimmung tobt ein erbitterter Krach um Meiler, Methoden und Milliarden. https://t.co/pCZBUfhvKc

    275412.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202617x their median

    Das israelische Militär kämpft mit Technologien und Strategien, die sich bald auch in Europa durchsetzen werden. Die europäischen Armeen können vom Nahen Osten viel lernen. https://t.co/2yW4er2TmI

    1221912.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202617x their median

    Die Weltuntergangsszenarien des Silicon Valley sind Kalkül. Politik und Wirtschaft tun gut daran, der Inszenierung von Big Tech mit eigener Datensouveränität statt Angst zu begegnen. https://t.co/5xOLGjQqyb

    204813.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202615x their median

    Es wäre naiv, das Tragen eines Kopftuchs durchwegs als freie Entscheidung zu betrachten. Es wäre aber auch ungerecht, jedes Kopftuch als Zeichen der Unterdrückung zu deuten. https://t.co/BjbUIgZUgR

    1141413.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202615x their median

    Deutsche Auswanderer zieht es vor allem ins helvetische Nachbarland. Die GrĂĽnde dafĂĽr sind eindeutig. https://t.co/u74DR1uYAs

    155825.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202615x their median

    Lange hatte die Volkspartei die Möglichkeit, die AfD zu integrieren – doch sie liess Chance um Chance verstreichen. Nun hat sie nur noch schlechte Optionen. https://t.co/rtCebuwJmY

    272103.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 496K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.137% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.294% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 213 interactions, about 107x its own typical post.

What is NZZ's engagement rate on X?
NZZ (@NZZ) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 495,725 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, NZZ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NZZ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NZZ post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going