Back to @NYMag's profile

New York Magazine engagement report

@NYMag - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 815 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
0.134%
5.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
27.97/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 815 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.134% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 28 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 815 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 1998x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lookbook, #approvalmatrix, #glutemaxxing.

Measured over 815 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #lookbook, #approvalmatrix, #glutemaxxing.

Compared with accounts its own size

New York Magazine's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, New York Magazine sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 321 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 20261998x their median

    The #LookBook goes to the first day of preschool, where the city’s universal-2K program’s inaugural class joined Friends of Crown Heights Educational Center: https://t.co/KPSqNnhIBA https://t.co/QcT4MPHvKA

    12K1.3K644641.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20261928x their median

    This past Valentine’s Day, 71-year-old Brad Reese, proud grandson of Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups inventor H. B. Reese, posted a scathing open letter to the manager of corporate brand and editorial at Hershey, accusing the company of unforgivably altering many Reese’s products by replacing real chocolate with compound chocolate — basically using vegetable oils instead of cocoa butter to lower costs and replacing real peanut butter with “peanut-butter-style crèmes.” “And Reese wasn’t alone in feeling like everything was getting worse,” writes Rachel Handler. “Everyone in my life I spoke to agreed that something was amiss, that Reese’s — and commercial chocolate in general — didn’t taste the way it used to.” Handler would spend the next several months tumbling down a chocolate vortex, encountering dozens of eccentric characters, all disagreeing about the fundamental question of what chocolate even is and who it should be for. “I learned that — not to sound like a LinkedIn guy — what’s going on with chocolate is a parable for the modern world. That at this particularly bleak end stage of capitalism, everything we once treasured has or will lose its essential essence and MrBeast will always be involved somehow.” For our cover story, Handler takes a deep dive into the molten belly of the chocolate world. Read it in full: https://t.co/8W0TITn3In

    12K1.3K1212721.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261911x their median

    For our inaugural “Men’s Style Issue,” we shvitzed and kibitzted with some of New York’s most stylish men at the Russian & Turkish Baths in the East Village, where photographer Ryan McGinley captured it all: https://t.co/11QSqJZE58 https://t.co/sAiIyETaRJ

    12K5951353471.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261321x their median

    It’s been a little over a year since Olandria Carthen, a 28-year-old elevator saleswoman from Alabama, became a fan favorite on season seven of Love Island USA. And though she didn’t win the competition, she’s playing the long game. “I want this to last a lifetime,” she says of building an entertainment career post-Fiji. “I want this very moment to last so I can build generational wealth for my kids, my grandkids, from just me going on a reality show.” Read the full interview with Olandria: https://t.co/vqEKvTrohi

    7.7K1.5K7648655K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20261258x their median

    It takes an inordinate amount of wit and charm to best Conan O’Brien in a riff-off. The most an average comedian or host can hope for is not to embarrass themselves trying, which is largely how Kareem Rahma fared in a recent episode of his popular social-media series, Subway Takes. But toward the end of the interview, Rahma and O’Brien were shown up by a stranger named Debbie Shields who just so happened to be commuting on their train. The 68-year old native New Yorker didn’t know what ‘SubwayTakes’ was, or that she was about to get pulled into a viral improvisational comedy bit. But thanks to a childhood spent performing in church and experience hosting comedy and karaoke nights, she says her instincts kicked in immediately. This 'SubwayTakes' appearance isn’t even the first time she has been put on the spot by someone with a huge comedy platform. Shields shares which comedian once pulled her onstage at Barclays Center, how she’s handling her virality, and whether she’d be interested in hosting a show of her own: https://t.co/WktKtAC7Fu

    8.3K4423165536K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261081x their median

    ‘Travel sports,’ a term that has come to encompass all sorts of private teams, leagues, and clubs, used to be for the truly exceptional young athlete. Now, they’re for anyone willing to pay — an expensive, exhausting commitment that has become popular not necessarily because millions of parents want them for their children but because it can feel like there’s no other choice. Rec programs are underfunded and struggle to compete with for-profit leagues for prime field, rink, and court times. And the level of play is diluted, often very early, as travel teams are incentivized to enroll children at young ages. Around 5 million children in the U.S. now compete on travel teams. Parents find themselves trapped. They know the benefits of sports and want that for their children, yet giving it to them often means buying into a sports ecosystem that’s inherently flawed. As the pay-to-play model increasingly takes hold, so does the idea that kids should start competing at younger and younger ages, risking their sense of self along with their shoulders and ACLs. “I never want my kids to look back and say I didn’t do everything I could to help them live their dreams,” a mother of three soccer players said. She’s hired professional photographers to take action shots for her 12- and 13-year-olds’ Instagram accounts — the platform has become a recruiting tool — and they’ve both asked her to pay for personal trainers. “I think the word isn’t ‘specialize’; you are ‘professionalizing’ your kid early. You are exposing them to everything professionals have to deal with — I’m talking injury, time, schedule, everything,” said John Van Benschoten, a former MLB player and travel-baseball coach. It makes one ask: All this for what? And for whom? Read Caitlin Moscatello’s cover story on how travel leagues have made youth sports more expensive, hypercompetitive, and all-consuming — and the investors who are making a killing: https://t.co/zHcKsPYfeC

    5.5K1.2K2944954.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026897x their median

    Conan O’Brien is open to doing a sitcom with the special guest from his @subwaytakes episode🤞 https://t.co/pn6ci1eldt

    6.0K2622232143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026794x their median

    Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor’s ‘Naza’ is one of the most important films of our time. 24 different Israeli intelligence officers testify in this unflinching exposé of systematic Israeli war crimes in Gaza. https://t.co/XDCjgbXPjj

    4.0K1.3K106146974K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026760x their median

    Natalie Harp, known as Donald Trump’s “human printer,” is the incredibly devoted (some might say unsettlingly obsessed) Trump aide whose job is to print out flattering articles about Trump and deliver them to him in a Lululemon bag. But her whole deal is even weirder. According to a ‘Vanity Fair’ excerpt of ‘All or Nothing,’ Michael Wolff’s book about the 2024 election, Harp is so wholly committed to Trump that she recently spent a summer living in a golf-club locker room just to be close to him. Revisit Craighead’s 2025 piece about why Trump’s closest aide is weirder than you might think: https://t.co/2BzbKKE6wJ

    4.0K1.0K212125549K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026593x their median

    While dropping off her 10-year-old son at Highbridge Recreation Center in Washington Heights on Sunday afternoon, Flora Huang said she couldn’t remember the last time she and her husband had been on a date. As soon as she heard about Parents’ Night Out, a new initiative from the city to give parents an evening of free babysitting, she rushed to sign up. She and her husband were going to grab Dominican food somewhere nearby and enjoy a few hours of peace and quiet. Their son was less excited. “He was all, ‘I don’t know how fun it’s going to be,’” Huang’s husband said, laughing. “But I was like, This isn’t about you. You’re going whether you like it or not.” As part of his pledge to make raising children in New York City more affordable, Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced this summer that the city would be offering free babysitting for up to 500 kids. For one night only, parents could drop off children ages 6 to 12 at certain New York City recreation centers and get four hours of child care — which, in the city, can easily cost more than $100. “Every parent knows that a few hours to yourself can feel like a luxury,” Mamdani said. “It shouldn’t be.” At the rec center in Washington Heights, some parents dropping their kids off had dinner plans, but more than one mother said they were excited just to go home and relax, maybe do a little shopping, or get some laundry done. “Every parent needs a break,” said one mom who had just dropped off her 6-year-old twins. “I’m tired.” Read Erica Schwiegershausen’s full dispatch from Mamdani’s babysitters club: https://t.co/hGsLE4T9QB

    3.5K4924167179K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lookbook#approvalmatrix#glutemaxxing

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 815 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.134% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 28 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 815 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 1998x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lookbook, #approvalmatrix, #glutemaxxing.

What is New York Magazine's engagement rate on X?
New York Magazine (@NYMag) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 815 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,861,211 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, New York Magazine sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NYMag have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NYMag post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 27.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going