National Testing Agency engagement report
@NTA_Exams - 886K followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 886K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 0.236% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nta, #ntaupdate, #ntaexams.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #nta, #ntaupdate, #ntaexams.
Compared with accounts its own size
National Testing Agency's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.014%, National Testing Agency sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 93% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 70% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 464 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 18, 202682x their median
NTA is closely monitoring and scrutinizing all complaints. In the wake of many OMR sheets submitted for scrutiny turning out to be fake/AI generated, students and parents are advised to submit only original OMRs for scrutiny. Any fake / AI generated OMR may invite legal action against the complainant .
- Jul 20, 202676x their median
Regarding claims by Ms. Pratibha Trivedi (App No. 260412140662) about her NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to her at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The image being circulated is a digitally altered version of the genuine OMR sheet. It is not, however, the sheet held on record with NTA and has been significantly altered digitally The score of 38 marks is verified and stands as declared. Creating or circulating a forged OMR answer sheet is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. More details on the Public Notice dated 20 July 2026: https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6
- Jul 20, 202637x their median
Regarding claims by Shri Abhay Yadav (App No. 260411367191) about his NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet and result: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The candidate has stated publicly that only 5 questions were left unattempted and that the result should be 634 marks. This is not supported by the record. Of 180 questions, 44 were left unattempted. The OMR and the calculation sheet on file are mutually consistent. The score of 164 marks is verified and stands as declared. Creating or circulating a forged OMR answer sheet, or making claims at variance with the record of a public examination, is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. More details on the Public Notice dated 20 July 2026: https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6
- Jul 20, 202636x their median
Regarding claims about Shri Avaneesh Srivastava (App No. 260411198880, Roll No. 2001805051) and his NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is on file. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. It bears the candidate’s correct name (Avaneesh Srivastava), the name of his father (Mukesh Kumar) and the name of his mother (Rekha Kumari), his signature and thumb impression, and the signatures of the invigilators. The image being circulated is not an OMR sheet issued by NTA. The identity inserted into that image ("Ajeet Singh, son of Shri Lakhan Singh and Smt. Reena Singh") does not correspond to any candidate registered for NEET (UG) 2026. No candidate by that name and parentage exists in the NEET (UG) 2026 database. The image is a digitally regenerated version of the candidate’s own genuine OMR sheet. The identity fields have been overwritten, and the printed portion of the sheet has been regenerated by AI or OCR-based tools, producing visible errors on portions of the genuine OMR sheet and cannot be altered by any candidate with a pen. The candidate’s own OMR sheet on record has been correctly evaluated. The score of 337 marks is verified and stands as declared. Creating or circulating a forged OMR answer sheet is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. More details on the Public Notice dated 20 July 2026: https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6
- Jul 29, 202634x their median
The Lok Sabha has passed the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, ushering in a tougher legal framework to combat examination malpractices. With stricter penalties, fast-track courts, enhanced investigation mechanisms and stringent action against exam fraud, the Bill aims to dismantle the paper leak ecosystem and increase transparency, credibility and fairness in the examination process. लोकसभा ने Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 को ध्वनिमत से पारित कर परीक्षा प्रणाली में पारदर्शिता, निष्पक्षता और विश्वसनीयता सुनिश्चित करने की दिशा में एक ऐतिहासिक कदम उठाया है। इस विधेयक के तहत कड़ी सज़ा, फास्ट-ट्रैक अदालतें, सशक्त जांच तंत्र और परीक्षा में धांधली करने वालों के खिलाफ सख्त कानूनी कार्रवाई का प्रावधान किया गया है, जिससे पेपर लीक के पूरे नेटवर्क पर प्रभावी रोक लगाई जा सकेगी। यह ऐतिहासिक कानून प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं की पवित्रता की रक्षा करने और देश के करोड़ों युवाओं के सपनों एवं मेहनत को सुरक्षित रखने की दिशा में एक निर्णायक पहल है।
- Jul 20, 202627x their median
Regarding claims by Ms. Arya Singh (App No. 260410434102) about her NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to her at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The image being circulated is a digitally altered version of that same sheet. The recorded time of signature of one of the invigilators has been changed from 3:45 PM on the genuine sheet to 2:45 PM on the altered image. There are several other markings of digital alteration on the forged OMR sheet. The score of 167 marks is verified and stands as declared. Creating or circulating a forged OMR answer sheet is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. More details on the Public Notice dated 20 July 2026: https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6
- Jul 16, 202624x their median
NTA Declares Result of NEET (UG) 2026 11.21 lakh candidates qualify; Results declared in time for counselling and Medical College Admissions; Toppers from almost all States and Union Territories; More than 58 per cent of qualified candidates are women; Examination conducted in 13 languages The National Testing Agency (NTA) declares the result of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate), NEET (UG) 2026. The result has been declared in time so that the medical-admission and counselling calendar for candidates stays on track. A total of close to 20 lakh candidates appeared for NEET (UG) 2026 at 5,440 centres in 551 cities in India and 14 cities abroad. 11.21 lakh candidates have qualified for admission to undergraduate medical, dental, AYUSH and allied programmes. Scorecards of all candidates are available on the official website, https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6. The full list of Top Rankers, State Toppers, category-wise toppers (SC, ST, OBC-NCL, Gen-EWS, PwBD and PwD), category-wise cut-off marks and language-wise participation is also being published on the NTA website. Overview of the Candidates who appeared in NEET UG Exam on 21st June 2026 Close to 20 lakh candidates appeared and 11.21 lakh qualified. Candidates appeared from every State and Union Territory of the country, in 13 languages. More than 58 per cent of the qualified candidates are women. The majority of the top-performing candidates are between 17 and 19 years of age. Profile of the Top Rankers 138 candidates scored above 690 marks out of 720. Of these: •Over 93 per cent appeared for NEET (UG) for the first time. •99 per cent are between 17 and 19 years of age. Geographical Distribution Qualified candidates have emerged from every one of the 36 States and Union Territories, ranging from over 1.7 lakh in Uttar Pradesh to 43 in Lakshadweep. State Toppers include Jigmet Yangchan Lamo (Ladakh, 530 marks), Dhruv Tripathi (Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 606 marks) and Fahmida Anees (Lakshadweep, 573 marks), and cover every North-Eastern State. 17 State Toppers scored 700 or above; 26 scored above 690. The 138 top rankers come from 66 cities across the country. The Top 17 rankers who scored more than 705 marks span eight States, namely Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, Tamil Nadu and Telangana. Score Distribution and Highest Scorers •19 candidates scored above 700 out of 720. •1,492 candidates scored 650 and above. •10,160 candidates scored 600 and above. •90,780 candidates scored 500 and above. The highest score of 715 out of 720 was obtained jointly by Aryan Gupta (Punjab) and Panshul Bansal (Haryana). Category-wise Qualified Candidates Registered, appeared and qualified figures are being published in full for General, Gen-EWS, OBC-NCL, SC, ST, PwBD, PwD and Third Gender candidates. Separate topper lists for each category are provided in the accompanying toppers document. Category-wise qualified candidates: •General: 2.91 lakh •OBC-NCL: 5.12 lakh •SC: 1.59 lakh •ST: 63,716 •Gen-EWS: 95,026 •PwBD: 3,666 •PwD: 303 Category-wise cut-off marks and percentiles are being published simultaneously. Participation and Qualification of Women Candidates More than 58 per cent of all qualified candidates are women. Women also qualified at a higher rate than men: 56.8 per cent of women who appeared qualified, as against 55.1 per cent of men. Languages of the Examination NEET (UG) 2026 was conducted in 13 languages: Hindi, Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu and English. Process and Timeline of Result Declaration The result was declared within time through re-engineering of the process, with stages designed to run in parallel rather than in sequence, and with the de-linking of OMR sheet challenge from answer key release. Each stage was completed in full and made available for candidate view: •Provisional answer key published on 25 June 2026; challenge window open from 25 to 28 June 2026. •Scanned OMR answer sheets and recorded responses displayed to candidates from 13 to 15 July 2026. •Final answer key published on 16 July 2026; result declared on 16 July 2026. Statutory FrameworkNTA conducts NEET (UG) under Section 14 of the NMC Act, 2019 and Section 14 of the NCISM Act, 2020, and for BHMS under the NCH, on the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and with the approval of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Ministry of Education. NTA’s mandate is to conduct the examination, declare the result on eligibility criteria provided by NMC, and issue the All-India Rank. Merit lists, category lists, domicile determination and counselling are the remit of the admitting/State authorities. NTA has no role in these. NEET (UG) result data is also used for admission to https://t.co/P1QVj20987. (H) Nursing and to BVSc and AH under the 15% VCI quota. AACCC is the counselling authority for the All-India Quota in BAMS/BUMS/BSMS and BHMS. Counselling and Candidate Advisory Counselling for the All-India Quota in MBBS/BDS is conducted by the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC). State quotas are conducted by respective State authorities. Candidates should rely only on official websites: https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6, https://t.co/Kql0EMCxDN and State counselling portals. Candidates are cautioned against fraudulent calls, messages or websites offering admission, seat blocking or score improvement. NTA does not contact candidates seeking money or credentials. Suspicious communication may be reported at [email protected] or 011-40759000.
- Jul 20, 202619x their median
Regarding claims by Shri Lakshya Singh (App No. 260412053016) about his NEET (UG) 2026 OMR answer sheet: NTA has verified the record. The genuine OMR of the candidate is with NTA. It was also emailed to him at the registered e-mail address during the OMR Response Key challenge window. The image being circulated shows response markings that are not present on the genuine sheet. Additional bubbles have been shaded in by digital means to create a forged OMR sheet. Of 180 questions, the candidate attempted 54 (34 correct, 20 incorrect) and left 126 unattempted. The score of 116 marks is verified and stands as declared. Creating or circulating a forged OMR answer sheet is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. More details on the Public Notice dated 20 July 2026: https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6
- Jul 20, 202616x their median
Regarding OMR-related claims for NEET (UG) 2026 being circulated on social media, it may be noted that the genuine OMR of every candidate concerned is on record with NTA. It was made available on the candidate portal and emailed to the candidates at the time of the OMR Response Key challenge window. The images being circulated as the "correct" OMR are digitally fabricated. They are not documents issued by NTA. Creating or circulating a forged OMR is an offence under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. More details on the Public Notice issued by NTA on 20th July at https://t.co/ehHaUsaoU6
- Aug 28, 202610x their median
🇮🇳 Government of India - Public Consultation Exam reforms: your suggestion is invited. The High-Powered Task Force on Reforms in Public Examinations wants to hear from students, parents, teachers, every citizen. Send yours on WhatsApp in 2 minutes: 👉 https://t.co/DMm44AZLKH Website: https://t.co/et5p8tZ4bk Toll-free: 1800-180-4747 Email: [email protected] Write in English, Hindi or any regional language. 🗓️ Last date: 13 September 2026 Forward this to your groups, every voice counts.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 886K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 0.236% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nta, #ntaupdate, #ntaexams.
- What is National Testing Agency's engagement rate on X?
- National Testing Agency (@NTA_Exams) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 885,916 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.014%, National Testing Agency sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NTA_Exams have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NTA_Exams post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.