NFSC Speaks engagement report
@NFSCSpeak - 185K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 211 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 4.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
NFSC Speaks's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.114%, NFSC Speaks sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.68% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 25% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 83% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 296 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 16, 202528x their median
2025.03.15 Collusion between the Biden family and the Chinese Communist Party https://t.co/Y6giqBPAra
- Aug 9, 20263.1x their median
2026.8.08 A flood of lawsuits against Miles Guo began in April 2017. PAX. SOHO China. HNA. Chinese businessmen, media figures—even people from Guo’s own circle. Different plaintiffs, same effect: drain his money, consume his time, and destroy his reputation. Then the pressure escalated. After Guo sought political asylum that September, his law firm, Clark Hill, was hacked. Confidential asylum files were stolen. Sensitive material later surfaced online. Beijing’s objective was bigger than winning cases: isolate him, exhaust him, then make one radioactive accusation become the verdict itself. For more uncensored updates, follow NFSCSpeaks on GETTR: https://t.co/9sw0l4kQNM
- Aug 3, 20262.7x their median
💥💥💥NFSC Latest Intelligence Brief💥💥💥 CCP’s New Exit-Control Regime Is a Warning to the West! Powered by Western technology and capital, the Chinese Communist Party has become the first regime in human history to place an entire population inside a centralized, AI-driven digital prison—one in which identity, movement, family life, and freedom are controlled by its dictatorial rulers! Media reports on CCP’s new exit-control regulations missed the two most consequential elements: First, according to the latest NFSC intelligence, all Chinese passports are being incorporated into a single centralized system integrating artificial intelligence, chip-based identification, and blockchain-style records. The system tracks every passport’s use, travel history, destination, and border crossing under Beijing’s direct control. Second, the CCP is implementing AI-driven exit-risk assessments. These evaluate a traveler’s family, profession, government status, destination, overseas relationships, and access to sensitive information. If the last immediate family member attempts to leave China, the system automatically trigger an alert. For CCP officials, regardless of rank, an even stricter tiered-control system is in place. Compared with ordinary citizens, they face more intensive surveillance, tighter movement restrictions, and automated warning mechanisms. Western governments and citizens must pay attention. For decades, the Chinese Communist Party has exported its ideology, revolutionary tactics, surveillance technology, censorship systems, and political influence while backing forces that deepen division and destabilize Western societies. As a result, the anti-Western, anti-American alliance is rapidly expanding worldwide. The CCP is not merely ruling China. It is working to subvert the free world by exporting its model, influencing political institutions, and capturing leaders and advancing movements aligned with Beijing’s interests. The consequences extend far beyond China’s borders. On July 31, Beijing published new exit-and-entry regulations scheduled to take effect on September 15. The rules authorize the CCP to bar Chinese people from leaving if they are deemed to have violated export-control or technology-transfer rules in ways that threaten industrial or technological security. Citizens accused of harming China’s national security or interests abroad may face exit bans lasting from six months to three years. Foreign nationals may also be barred from entering China for one to five years for allegedly submitting false information during visa applications or border procedures. The regulations follow Beijing’s reported decision to prevent two co-founders of the AI startup Manus from leaving China while authorities reviewed Meta’s $2 billion acquisition. On paper, this is called law. In practice, exit restrictions have existed for decades but were selectively imposed on targeted populations. The new law vastly expands that power, giving the criminal regime broader authority to treat every individual’s knowledge, profession, family, and freedom of movement as property of the state. The law provides the authority. Centralized passport data provides the infrastructure. AI selects the target. Family ties provide the leverage. This is not border management. It is predictive population control. China is the testing ground, and the Chinese people are the subjects of the experiment. If totalitarianism overtakes the free world, the lives of ordinary Chinese today will become humanity’s tomorrow. Wake up! Take down the CCP! #FreeMilesGuo #TakeDowntheCCP
- Aug 5, 20262.7x their median
A New York Times report exposes the CCP’s chilling surveillance database, tracking foreigners’ identities, beliefs, movements, and daily lives. But Miles Guo warned about this system nearly a decade ago, revealing that CCP intelligence maintains a dedicated unit to collect information on overseas Chinese and foreigners. The scale and intrusiveness of this surveillance go far beyond anything most people can imagine. For more uncensored updates, follow NFSCSpeaks on GETTR: https://t.co/9sw0l4kQNM
- Aug 2, 20262.6x their median
2026.8.01 CGI, backed by in-house fraud investigators and legal-risk specialists, claimed it accepted GTV’s confidential records and passed them to PAX without investigating the source or verifying the website where the records supposedly appeared. CGI’s own filings contradict that account. The timeline does not add up, and its digital evidence filed in courts contains the usernames “omm-lgarnette” and “omm-jshannon” — identifiers bearing O’Melveny & Myers’ initials, the law firm representing PAX. With Beijing-controlled Duowei providing the cover story, the record raises serious questions about how this evidence was created, handled, and presented in an American courtroom. For more uncensored updates, follow NFSCSpeaks on GETTR: https://t.co/9sw0l4kQNM
- Sep 6, 20262.5x their median
Huawei goes before a Brooklyn jury on Sept. 8, 2026. Racketeering. Fraud. Trade-secret theft. Huawei denies the charges. But Miles Guo said the real story goes much deeper. He revealed that behind Huawei stood PLA military intelligence and Xi Jinping’s family🇨🇳💥. Expose Huawei’s true nature, Guo warned, and you expose those on Wall Street, inside the U.S. military and intelligence establishment who sold America out 🇺🇸💥. Will the truth finally come out, or will powerful interests keep it buried? #TakeDowntheCCP. #FreeMilesGuo Translate post
- Sep 5, 20262.5x their median
Are your retirement savings safer today because of Miles Guo’s revelations? October 2021: Guo issued an “announcement to the world”—the CCP’s unrestricted financial warfare, he warned, had reached Wall Street. 3,000 funds were on notice. He named Ping An Group: over $3 trillion. Guo described a kleptocratic system where fake or replicated art was assigned inflated values, insured, then pledged as collateral for bank loans, while the same circle controlled banking, insurance, and real estate, systematically looting the wealth of the Chinese people. And it reached America. Guo warned that Ping An-backed Lufax reached into U.S. pensions, Wall Street, and the financial system, a “nuclear-weapon-grade” time bomb. Anyone still covering for the CCP’s crimes against Chinese and American people is no longer a bystander. They are an accomplice. CCP ≠ Chinese People; CCP ≠ China #TakeDowntheCCP
- Aug 25, 20262.2x their median
💥💥💥What is happening between the United States 🇺🇸and Canada 🇨🇦is not just a trade issue. It is a national-security issue. America is right to confront unfair trade and put American interests first. The NFSC urges America to widen the lens: beyond tariffs lies a deeper national-security threat posed by the CCP. 💥💥💥According to NFSC intelligence, tens of thousands of active-duty PLA personnel are currently in Canada. The NFSC has long warned that Beijing’s strategy extends far beyond economics, using political influence, intelligence networks, financial leverage, technology, and military penetration to advance its interests. America cannot afford to view developments on its northern border through the lens of trade alone. See the bigger threat. Follow the intelligence. Ask the hard questions.
- Aug 15, 20262.2x their median
2026.8.14 Rui Ma went under oath, and the contradictions piled up. Her complaint alleged captivity, isolation, and a seized passport. Yet she traveled internationally, used that passport, maintained social media, went out with friends, and contradicted herself about Tinder. She testified she hated Guo. Yet after her alleged escape, she texted him a holiday greeting. Most damaging: key dates and events vanished from memory until documents were placed before her. Her testimony did not revive the story. The paperwork did. Whose script was she following? For more uncensored updates, follow NFSCSpeaks on GETTR: https://t.co/9sw0l4kQNM
- Aug 16, 20262.1x their median
2026.8.15 Money gave the fabricated allegations reach and legitimacy. Bruno Wu testified he hired Sam Nunberg, and they discussed using publicity against Guo. Nunberg’s mentor, Roger Stone, then repeated accusations against Guo--only to retract them, apologize, and admit they were false. Stone said the information came through Nunberg, with Wu as the apparent source. Wu also admitted he didn’t know whether Ma’s allegations were true, leaving the attorney to verify everything before he would pay. Yet the hastily filed rape complaint contained no specific dates. The record raises more questions: what was actually verified, and for whom? For more uncensored updates, follow NFSCSpeaks on GETTR: https://t.co/9sw0l4kQNM
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 211 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 4.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
- What is NFSC Speaks's engagement rate on X?
- NFSC Speaks (@NFSCSpeak) has an engagement rate of 0.114%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 185,396 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.114%, NFSC Speaks sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NFSCSpeak have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NFSCSpeak post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.