Back to @NFLonFOX's profile

FOX Sports: NFL engagement report

@NFLonFOX - 4.9M followers on X

Measured over 569 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 4.9M followers
Per impression
0.731%
88K views on a typical post
Reach
1.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
647
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
27 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
23.13/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 647 interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 569 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 0.731% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 23.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 569 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfg, #nfl.

Measured over 569 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #lfg, #nfl.

Compared with accounts its own size

FOX Sports: NFL's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, FOX Sports: NFL sits above the 10th percentile of the 160,367 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.606%
p902.33%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 160,367 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,797 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.606%
90th percentile2.33%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 202678x their median

    September 30th October 1st https://t.co/oyMbKIBoEw

    48K2.5K6232669K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202655x their median

    "I had 2 losses in that stadium. Which would leave a bitter taste in my mouth if I didn't beat them 33 other times." -@TomBrady πŸ˜‚ πŸ“Ί FOX/FOX One https://t.co/5ETRi8B00W

    34K1.7K2152122.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202633x their median

    Repost if your team is undefeated after Week 1. πŸ‘€ https://t.co/6pGHgmDOL2

    16K4.9K165207287K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202624x their median

    213 DAYS IN THE MAKING. THE NFL IS BACK! 🏈🀩 https://t.co/Icto3SzvqC

    13K2.6K66159180K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202622x their median

    Power Rankings after Week 1 of NFL action 🚨 Who's too high and who's too low? https://t.co/HUqmoZ2Eyw

    12K8321.1K434898K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202620x their median

    β€œThis stadium is yours, Buffalo.” πŸ₯Ή (via @KBoogieKyle) https://t.co/pZGuVpEJQv

    12K47110965541K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202616x their median

    Only 5 undefeated teams remain after Week 3 https://t.co/yYFvO58c4r

    9.5K799122126268K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    A dramatic road victory for Philadelphia πŸ¦… @JalenHurts caught up with our @Kristina_Pink after the @Eagles completed the comeback in the final seconds https://t.co/OGCnBKXUnT

    8.4K1.4K1133541.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202616x their median

    The Rams are the only winless NFC West team after Week 1 https://t.co/SYWZCsTuT4

    9.2K647160148242K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202616x their median

    The AFC North is the only division with all four teams holding winning records. https://t.co/kWYfWlgSPz

    9.1K78889109859K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lfg#nfl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 647 interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 569 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 0.731% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 23.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 569 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfg, #nfl.

What is FOX Sports: NFL's engagement rate on X?
FOX Sports: NFL (@NFLonFOX) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 569 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,935,621 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, FOX Sports: NFL sits above the 10th percentile of the 160,367 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NFLonFOX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NFLonFOX post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 23.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going